Public bug reported:
Currently, OQ-Engine allows a user to input a site_model.xml file
containing spatial distribution of site parameters (Vs30, Vs30Type,
...). This information is then used in the hazard calculation to set the
site parameters for the locations for which hazard results (curves,
gmfs) need to be computed - what happens is that for each location the
closest site in the site model is taken and its site parameters are
associated to the location.
Now, an error occur when locations defined in the site model are the
same of the locations defined in the configuration file. It should be
possible however to allow for such a possibility (it's possible to have
informations for sites parameters at the locations where results need to
be computed).
** Affects: openquake
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
OpenQuake.
Matching subscriptions: openquake-bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092056
Title:
OQ-ENGINE: It should be possible to define a site model exactly on the
same position where hazard is computed
Status in OpenQuake:
New
Bug description:
Currently, OQ-Engine allows a user to input a site_model.xml file
containing spatial distribution of site parameters (Vs30, Vs30Type,
...). This information is then used in the hazard calculation to set
the site parameters for the locations for which hazard results
(curves, gmfs) need to be computed - what happens is that for each
location the closest site in the site model is taken and its site
parameters are associated to the location.
Now, an error occur when locations defined in the site model are the
same of the locations defined in the configuration file. It should be
possible however to allow for such a possibility (it's possible to
have informations for sites parameters at the locations where results
need to be computed).
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openquake/+bug/1092056/+subscriptions