Resolution & frame
1920X1080 MJPEG@ 50fps/ USB3.0 1920X1080 YUY2@ 50fps
1280X720 MJPEG@ 50fps / USB3.0 1280X720 YUY2@ 50fps
640X480MJPEG@ 50fps / USB3.0 640X480 YUY2@ 50fps
Resolution & frame
1280 (H) x 720 (V) pixels MJPEG 30fps YUY2 10fps
960 (H) x 720 (V) pixels MJPEG 30fps YUY2 15fps
800 (H) x 600 (V) pixels MJPEG 30fps YUY2 20fps
640 (H) x 480 (V) pixels MJPEG 30fps YUY2 30fps
352(H) x 288 (V) pixels MJPEG 30fps YUY2 30fps
320 (H) x 240 (V) pixels MJPEG 30fps YUY2 30fps
176(H) x 144 (V) pixels MJPEG 30fps YUY2 30fps
160 (H) x 120 (V) pixels MJPEG 30fps YUY2 30fps
Yes higher FPS is good, if everything else stays the same
(resolution, color).
But I would not buy a variable zoom/focus lens. You need
repeatable results in Computer Vision, so you want to select the
right fixed focal-length lens and also set the
focus once, then fix it using set screws.
Also these zoom lenses might have more complex distortions that
cannot be compensated as well. Finally, remember the camera is
moved around on the head, hopefully with aggressive motion.
The comparatively huge lens adds off-center weight, might add to
stresses on the camera, worsen image vibrations, even cause some
shifting or drift. All this is relevant in precision machine
vision.
The recommended camera is the ELP 720p, but three is a FullHD
model, that has a 720p mode with double the FPS, i.e. 60fps (I
have this model):
http://www.elpcctv.com/full-hd-usb-camera-module-1080p-usb20-ov2710-color-sensor-support-mjpeg-with-36mm-lens-p-203.html --> buy it with a longer lens!
The downside of this camera is that it needs a dedicated USB port on the PC. Two cannot be operated over the same root USB hub, because the needed bandwidth is too high at double the FPS.
I guess there are newer USB 3.0 models that do not have this
restriction (likely the following is the camera that is inside
that housing you linked):
That one is just USB 2.0 but has 720p @ 120fps.
Just keep in mind that the OpenPnP recommendation is there for a
reason. On unknown/new camera makes and models, the specs often
sound good, but then some setting is missing (e.g. manual
exposure) or the compression quality is worse. Time and again
there have been disappointments. If have once tried a 120fps
global shutter camera, that was nice but had a terrible bug in
clipping overexposed parts, creating "psychedelic" false color
elements. Unusable for computer vision.
Conversely, if you test a new model positively, please report your findings back here.😁
_Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenPnP" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openpnp+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openpnp/d0db6257-5b4d-4ba8-8c68-5c069da364a3n%40googlegroups.com.