Hi all, thanks so much to everyone who replied by email or by google form! Here is a roundup of what I learned.
Regarding course marking being librarians' work:
- All respondents from institutions where state policy requires course marking said that library employees are involved in the course marking workflow.
Regarding the nation-wide scope of the issue:
- In states with legislative requirements, there are institutions that implemented course marking before it was required; examples include Columbia Gorge Community College in Oregon and North Shore Community College in Massachusetts.
- In states without legislative requirements, institutions in Minnesota, Utah, Indiana, Rhode Island, and Illinois decided to implement course marking.
- In three more states without legislative requirements, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Florida, librarians are currently working on proposals to implement course marking.
- All respondents affirmed that their workflow would be improved by open-source software that enables any SIS to interface with any bookstore software system.
I got lots of affirmation that this automation would be valuable. I also got several replies highlighting issues with the underlying data that a technical problem won't fix:
There is a lot of interpretation that occurs with marking up the pdf from the bookstore so I think that job needs to stay with the library. This also allows me to see if classes have switched to or from OER.
I am curious about how this might work in the equitable access sphere. Where all courses are billed the same, what gets marked? This is why we had to stop efforts here to pursue course marking. Our university pays B&N out of operating funds. The students aren't billed directly on a line item. So marking a course low or no cost would confuse them.
I'm very new to course marking and working with the bookstore on course marking, and automation would help streamline some things. I would, however, worry about inaccuracies with an automated system. I'm still trying to tease out how the bookstore report handles faculty who don't report their textbook to the bookstore (I'm worried it's getting lumped in with "No titles required" the way OER/zero-cost courses are). Additionally, some courses require textbook package purchases but don't go through the bookstore, so an automated system would classify them as "zero-cost" even though they're far from it.
Thanks again :)
Amy