--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Oregon Educational Resources" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openoregon+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openoregon/ee2025a3-e85e-43de-bd1b-c742219d415en%40googlegroups.com.
The best option is probably to reach out to the content creator and see if they are okay with that modification.
David G. Johnston, PhD
Pronouns: he/him/his
Assistant Professor of Physics
Vice President, OT-AAUP
Oregon Institute of Technology, Portland-Metro Campus
Room 208H
Wilsonville, OR 97070
From: openo...@googlegroups.com <openo...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Martha Bailey
Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 8:41 AM
To: Jennifer Jordan <nifers...@gmail.com>
Cc: Open Oregon Educational Resources <openo...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [openoregon] Quick licensing question
You don't often get email from mba...@pcc.edu. Learn why this is important |
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openoregon/CAHD3%2BoAFeXPwJVPfuTJiSagfvNQX%3DM-mto-hhUBUaQGCMtBWOA%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi all,
Contacting the author always seems like a good idea! However, I will add that my understanding is that “No Derivatives” does have some flexibility and is not a complete bar to any modifications, only those that would rise to the level of a derivative work or adaptation (link is to an interesting passage on the creative commons blog).
The CC license itself says you are free to “Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.” If you were to move the material to a new format or tech platform, I would think that adding accessibility features, such as tagged headings for example, would be totally okay, as that is a feature of the medium.
The legal language used in the CC license uses the words “adapted material that is derived....”
By “in a manner requiring permission,” we have to look deeper into US copyright law, I think.
In US law, according to Title 17 Section 101 of the Copyright Act:
A “derivative work” is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a “derivative work”.
In the excerpt above, it is only changes that would cause the work, as a whole, to be considered an original work of authorship, and as such, a derivative work.
On the other hand 1) I am not a lawyer and am applying a layperson’s understanding of all these legal terms… and 2) contacting the author seems like a great idea, if only because they may want to make the same modifications to the original work!!
So after like 13 paragraphs of email, I have to endorse David’s suggestion that the best option is to reach out to the author, haha! 😊
Thanks!
Kristin
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openoregon/20CEEA12-1097-499E-B355-51E38C83DBD2%40mail.wou.edu.