Let's get the discussion started about this project, hear your thougts on it and ideas on how to move this one. We have a demo session with the City of Oakland on thursday to show them what is possible with opensource platforms!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenOakland" group.
To post to this group, send email to openo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openoakland...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/openoakland/-/99rIzKl6XGQJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenOakland" group.
To post to this group, send email to openo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openoakland...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/openoakland/-/lLiaXMLNkZAJ.
Here's what I took away from that meeting:
* The city really has no experience with any opensource tools or the concept
* The city is talking as if it has no money but they have been approved for a budget on this project
* There is very little trust that anyone besides a large vendor can actually supply good software or services
The most impacting thing I saw was their visceral reaction to what we said would be the hosting costs using an Amazon AWS server- I think they thought we were actually lying to them. We suggested it's costing $5 a month now and would maybe cost $50-$100 for them long term. They have never heard of such low costs for anything and really didn't believe us at all.
It seems they are gung ho for Socrata or Junar and aren't in a place to consider anything that isn't boxed with a vendor contract attached.
So we have three possibile approaches, I'd love to hear thoughts on these:
1) We draft a proposal to build out and manage a system for the city with the training, support, data loading suport etc built in with the legal safety net they feel they need, or
2) We accept that we don't want to compete commercially in this case and we keep our current site alive with minimal work as a demonstration for future visibility, or
3) We build out the site initially with a bunch of changes, the opencolorado PHP skin and promote it, then let it rest when the city does launch something near the end of the year- this would give us some good visibility till then, when we can graciously bow out and thank the city for providing us with a solid data platform to hack on in future.
Weigh in brigadeers!
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:50:48 PM UTC-7, Spike wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenOakland" group.
To post to this group, send email to openo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openoakland...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/openoakland/-/Vj_sMM-4CnoJ.
I'm down for folks to add data they uncover yes. It would be good for us to use some light process for this though- I'd be happy to have my research staff check each new file to see if there's a better/newer one available we or others may have and to make sure the data are documented enough- and we can farm out this approval process to our brigade members who are happy doing this- some level of quality control is helpful...
I have some times I can jump in with others to start on this, as long as we can get the server access from Eddie in time- he is around I believe.
Sidenote- Matt- wonder if we could use the Tribune press spot to promote LocalWiki as one of the major outcomes of the event?
Spike
I think it would be valuable to clean up census data and post it on the website. I would love to help w that. Im also down to help w the wiki if i can, esp if its letting longtime comm members know they can contribute. So if there is a meetup nxt wk plz let me know
And a media plan would be a great idea to formulate. We should chat bout that soon.
Having OpenOakland as the "vendor" is not a viable option for the city. (We are Open Oakland, right?). They will only choose an open source product if it's feature set, support and vendor is trustworthy. Quoting AWS hosting costs is apples and oranges. It sounds a bit like we took the open source as ideology approach to sales. If our product is the better product it has to win on the proprietary software playing field. Meaning, we need to demonstrate it's ROI.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenOakland" group.
To post to this group, send email to openo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openoakland+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/openoakland/-/gELXbrAJ_6cJ.