lack of documentation - due to a 'closed' wiki?

[mc23646266]

I do feel the openmeta standard isn't documented very well.
At least if one can hardly read the development stuff, there are only
a few documents about openmeta.

Maybe it's developers are busy fixing technical issues to get them
work,
or they do not need 'higher level' information?

But anyway, the openmeta wiki cannot be extended by others.
Isn't the basic idea of a wiki: collaboration? Everybody may
contribute to the wiki.
This is not the case with openmeta, nobody can contribute to it.

Please think about opening the wiki.

greetz

=:-)f

P.S. searching and referring to information in various threads is not
very convenient.