mc23646266
unread,Dec 8, 2009, 9:11:18 AM12/8/09Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to OpenMeta
Sure it is. it's more than that. and i am worried about it.
'OpenMeta is an standard xattr-based method for storing tags, ratings,
and other metadata to files.'
It's mostly useful on Mac OS X 10.4, 10.5, 10.6.
This works for me with (hey, despite xattr - with all my mp3 too):
- debian-based nas's {xfs with smb+afp(netatalk)} reading the xattr,
(but not really useful to me due to plists ...? ) but server-based
data.
- os x 10.6.2 clients (afp)
- tagger, tagit, taglists, openmeta, ls -l@, leap(<100%), yep (<100%)
for writing and reading xattr
BTW: is there an openmeta client for windows? for reading?
does it work with windows, within ntfs, is smb ok?
But i also worry about the so called 'standard'. Please - get it
right!
Is it really more than marketing? There is basically NO documentation
of the 'standard', isn't it?
Do I need to read and understand the sources? to trust it?
And by the word 'standard' i think of a slowly evolving 'something'.
According to my readings here, the standard for adding and managing
tags, ratings, and other metadata to files on OS X is moving 'fast'
sometimes.
it is moving fast if it is open -
it is NOT moving if it is closed.
weird thing.
- moving fast if it is open -
I've already 'collected' mailtags and default folder x in the past.
didn't realize how many tools i use (Aehm, i own) with openmeta
support built-in.
((Maybe i do not use them for their max possible extend)). But hope
all stay interoperable.
- NOT moving if it is closed -
I am shocked by my readings about apple's bug deleting MY metadata.
sent feedback the usual way. will it be read? won't take it for sure.
I am shocked, as i finally realize my OS X 10.6.2 Workstation cannot
really use metadata within my LAN.
I don't have 'osx 10.6 clients' i am interested in - all data i am
interested in is networked AND heterogenous!
Linux, OS X, Windows 7, ... iphones, AppleTV, Soundbridges,
'airtunes' ... many clients are reading the files.
Am I slaughtered before reaching the grail?
How can this holy shit be useful in the net, in the enterprise?
It's all about the Cloud, the cloud, the cloud - not a bitten apple.
I really hope this standard will last -
I really wish it could be networked.
I really wished i could trust it.
greetz
=:-)f