Best.
Nathan
Instead of making some server a # 1 source of ??, those interested in open mfrg
could use a decentralized secure file sharing app like suggested by
Cathal Garvey on diybio to choose multiple groups and subgroups and
conversations and projects to belong to:
http://retroshare.sourceforge.net/
On 03/29/2012 05:04 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
> I was going to write up a "How and Why to use Retroshare" document,
.
here's the suggestion: All of you should go download Retroshare,
.
.
> Degrees of separation are tiny in communities like DIYbio. We'll rapidly
> be connected to the same network, and will have a nice decentralised
> sharing platform for projects, blogs, documents and such. It would also
> provide a decentralised forum
Why not just use HTTP and SSL? This just hides information from us.
This is a public group.
Sure. not saying to drop the public group, just that for
projects, a public group is not interested in the details and these tools
seem a good organization aid. Google+ has the same drawbacks
of being non-public, but more negatives in that it can always
change drastically or go away and leave your project unmaintainable
without a lot of foresight in backing up.
John
If it could receive post data (such as comments, news, videos, ect. ) shared from social networks (Facebook, Google+, ect.), in addition to the postings on the Open Manufacturing client, that would be ideal.
Nathan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Manufacturing" group.
To post to this group, send email to openmanufacturing@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openmanufacturing+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openmanufacturing?hl=en.