Re: Space Colony Starter Kit

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Eric Hunting

unread,
Jun 13, 2010, 4:08:56 PM6/13/10
to openmanu...@googlegroups.com
I love big futurist ideas and Cloud Nine was definitely one of Fuller's biggest and most fanciful. There are, of course, a lot of bugs with such grand concepts that one would expect to work out in development. But the critical stumbling block for Cloud Nine was an extreme minimum scale barrier. The mass fraction of hot air LTA lift is very small so the minimum size needed for a proof of concept was so large it was untenable for most any developer. Devised long before the advent of comprehensive computer structural modeling, even building a working model of this with struts on the scale of pencils would mean a workshop on the scale of a sport stadium. This extreme minimum scale barrier was a common problem for Fuller and futurist designers in general. And Fuller wasn't alone at that period of time with notions of sky cities. There were about a half dozen concepts for this floating around in the early 60s. Western culture was much more open to big ideas in that era, even if very few of them were realized.

But the notion of an LTA structure as an orbital settlement pre-cursor is sound -assuming your systems are analogs to a lighter form of prospective orbital structure. Advanced airship developer Michael Walden proposed the use of aerostats as near-space-stations almost a decade ago and for a while was pursuing the concept of making them pay for themselves by doubling as telecom stations and flying casino resorts. I recall that he was once talking to the developers of the Star Trek Experience in Las Vegas about this and had proposed re-creating the imaginary Deep Space Nine space station as a aerostat resort. Seemed a little over-the-top to me as his simpler lenticular hull designs were quite elegant enough as a possible flying hotel.

I've come to call these flying manned stations and community concepts 'aerostadts'. Using dirigible technology and conventional lift gasses offering a higher mass fraction, it's possible to develop in a more incremental/scalable fashion, though it still has pretty large minimum scales for anything manned and we may have to wait for new nano-fiber composites to offer us the prospect of vacuum lift structures for this to explore permanently habitable aerostats in a comprehensive way. In TMP2 I explored this concept as a derivative of the Aquarian Airship technology for use as a telecom aerostat and modest platform for testing TransHab style structures;

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090502155817/tmp2/images/3/36/AquarianAerostat.jpg

Now, this design concept is optimized as a telecom aerostat but the vertical truss arrangement for a columnar stacked series of lift and habitat elements would probably work for a scalable manned high altitude station with a fair analog to orbital habitats based on TransHab type elements. Imagine a core truss that ties a vertical stack of TransHab modules to a vertical stack of much larger but still similarly shaped lift cells covered in flex cells PVs. Alternatively, a single very large spherical lift cell might be used, akin to the 21st Century Airships designs (http://www.21stcenturyairships.com/ see their spherical aerostat in the gallery section for a close analogy) which I've also been considering lately as the basis of soft-lander simulators for lunar/Mars telerobotic analog stations in the Atacama desert. Four light booms would support station-keeping fan -or at stratospheric altitude, plasma- thrusters. This would still likely need to employ some kind of VTOL airship with top-mounted docking ports for access and that would keep this at quite a grand-scale project. One wonders just how much one would actually save over just going to orbital deployment if a lot of very new technology still needs to be developed.


Eric Hunting
erich...@gmail.com

On May 29, 2010, at 5:41 AM, openmanufact...@googlegroups.com wrote:

> Space Colony Starter Kit
> Bryan Bishop <kan...@gmail.com> May 28 11:19AM -0500 ^
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: William Mook <mokme...@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:38 AM
> Subject: [SpaceRenaissance-2478] Space Colony Starter Kit
> To: Space Renaissance Initiative <space-renaissa...@googlegroups.com>
>
>
> Buckminster Fuller was a scientist and engineer who developed
> tensegrity space frame structures. These are used to build things
> like geodesic domes, and the C60 molecule is called fullerene in his
> honor. One of the things he noted in building very large domes like
> the astrodome in Texas, was how the weight of the dome scaled with
> size. Dome weight is a function of area and area goes up with the
> square of the size. The volume of air - and so the weight of the air
> - goes up with the cube of the size. When you got aluminum and glass
> spheres more than 500 meters across the weight of the air vastly
> exceeds the weight of the sphere enclosing it. So, by heating the air
> slightly, the sphere can carry substantial weight. The weight of a
> small city. This was the basis of the Cloud Nine Tensigrity City.
>
> http://stevendejonckheere.blogspot.com/2006/08/cloud-nine.html
>
> These can be tethered to the Earth, or better yet, free-floating!
> Using the jet-stream to navigate around the planet.
>
> To me these always seems a starting point to building cities in
> space!
>
> To this end I've looked at my larger concentrating balloons that I'm
> building for my solar concentrators. These 40 meter diameter balloons
> contains 33,510.3 cubic meters of air. The air weighs 42.7 metric
> tons! The sphere itself is made of 5,026.5 square meters of tough
> transparent PET plastic film - similar to that used in sail boat sail
> cloth. One kilogram of this stuff - infused with kevlar fiber -
> covers 17.6 square meters. The stuff is tough enough to take 500 mph
> wind loads! It weighs only 285.6 kilograms 0.3 metric tons. By
> heating the air slightly a NET lift of 8.25 metric tons is produced.
> This is the weight of a fully equipped motor home!
>
> By capturing half the solar energy falling on the sphere - and using
> it to electricity at 60% efficiency - 377 kW is produced when the sun
> shines. Averaged over the day - 100 kW is possible.
>
> An Enstrom 480B helicopter masses only 825 kg empty and carries no
> more than 535 kg. The Rolls Royce turbine engine that powers the
> helicopter generates 420 shp or 314 kW.
>
> An electric version of this system, using fuel cells and electric
> motors is possible.
>
> http://www.wired.com/autopia/2008/04/in-an-aviation/
>
> Making hydrogen and oxygen from water and sunlight is what I do.
>
> http://www.mokenergy.com
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/25174645/Mokenergy-Brochure-2
>
> So, a 40 meter diameter transparent sphere supporting a tracking
> concentrator - that powers a multi-junction photovoltaic system that
> operates high temperature electrolysis at the focal point during
> daylight hours to flash water into hydrogen and oxygen at very high
> efficiencies - and store the hydrogen on board - while capturing the
> heat to maintain a large temperature difference between the outside
> air and air within the sphere - should be possible. The sphere
> supports not only the power system, but also a mobile home arrangement
> along with a docking system for two Enstrom 480B helicopters adapted
> to run on a hydrogen fuel cell - with hydrogen obtained from the solar
> power setup aboard the 'floating home'
>
> The docking system would adapt the hook and trapeze system developed
> for parasite fighters and used on bombers like the B36 in the 1950s
> and 60s dirigibles like the Akron 30 years before that.
>
> http://www.boeing.com/history/mdc/goblin.htm
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airborne_aircraft_carrier
>
> This aerial yacht would float at 2,000 meters (6,500 ft) when it
> wanted to visit a place - and use the helicopters to shuttle between
> the surface and the home. In transit the home would rise to 30,000 ft
> (the habitat has a turbine to maintain air pressure just like any
> pressurized aircraft) and ride the 100 mph+ jet stream winds.
> Doppler radar aboard and satellite communications allow for detailed
> planning of riding the natural waves of air circulating around our
> planet.
>
> The volume of the system and area is rather large. This suggest that
> perhaps plants might be grown around the base of the sphere -
> surrounding the pressurized cabin - using a form of aeroponics
>
> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1859740/aeroponics_nasa/
> http://www.nasa.gov/offices/ipp/centers/kennedy/success_stories/Inflatable_Aeroponic_System_BBlinds.html
>
> Yields from enclosed aeroponic systems are such that all fruits and
> vegetables for a family of four is easily obtained from such a system
> aboard the home. It also adds a touch of green around the aerial
> estate.
>
> Ocean going yachts go for between $2 million and $200 million.
> Private jets run in the same price range. An aerial solar powered
> yacht nearly independent of the Earth below, should be worth as much
> as these, and give engineers the opportunity to begin building systems
> that will one day be useful in making cities in the sky, and
> eventually cities and colonies in space.
>
> A dozen test systems would prove out the various concepts, and once
> proven successful, safe and reliable, homes might be offered a few
> years after testing was started. Half the homes - outfit to the
> highest standards by interior design specialists - would then be sold
> at market rates (~$50 million each) or leased at this rate ($100,000
> per week) with experienced crew - trained on board - to earn half a
> billion dollars to expand on this program and begin building larger
> systems - Cloud Nine Cities - of 1,000 or more - where each home there
> is $2 m+ (or $4,000 per week). A city of 1,250 would generate $2.5
> billion - which builds an even larger city. A city of 10,000 at
> $500,000 each generates $5 billion in sales.
>
> Within 10 years we could be selling
>
> 100 aerial yachts per year earning $5 billion.
> 2 cities of 1,250 each per year earning $5 billion
> 1 city of 10,000 each per year earning $5 billion
>
> This income exceeds NASA's budget, and is about half that generated by
> companies like Boeing or Lockheed.
>
> Building a heavy lift launcher along with solar power satellites while
> including space colonies and space homes would be a logical
> progression along this development arc.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_habitat
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Space Renaissance Initiative" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> space-renaissa...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> space-renaissance-in...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/space-renaissance-initiative?hl=en?hl=en
> Also keep upgraded on http://www.spacerenaissance.org/
>
>
> --
> - Bryan
> http://heybryan.org/
> 1 512 203 0507

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages