Does anyone here actually know what is going on, besides "we're making
a furry OS"? Anyone who can tell me what this phrase actually *means*?
-- Pi
I do, just dont have time atm to explain
-- Pi
Wait! remix first to get out there, then the big project
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 20:55, Kifura Da Fox <thund...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. We still have many members who are interested in the project. But what
> we lack is motivation. Our goal is still the same and is dead simple: to
> create an operating system the fandom would use.
What. Does. That. Mean? What problem are you trying to solve?
> Let me be blunt: we made some huge mistakes and steered waaaay far from
> the actual objective.
I have heard this several times too.
> It will be a desktop OS. We will implement tablet support but it will
> REMAIN a desktop OS. We are not going to use Ubuntu as the strip.NO remix.
> It will be its own OS. So, base it off Debian's stable branch instead.
Are you the release-engineering team? Excellent. What technique is
being used to automate creating a release image?
> Also, we will need to publicize this on many sites, tell your friends, use
> facebook, Google+, FA, DA, FNN, etc,etc.
> The more people we recruit the more likely it will happen.
Publicity won't hurt, no.
> Lastly we need compilers, coders and programmers. Joshua needs to step up as
> well and be a REAL spokesperson. If you dont want part, then dont be. But
> this idea is not dead yet.
It's curious that you're accusing me of not wanting to be a part of
this. On the contrary, I am quite interested in this project, which is
why I am asking questions about how the project will get *done*.
-- Pi
...the thing Ubuntu did so well was make Debian usable. I always felt that Debian was a pointless exercise because to me, the point of a distribution is to make everything easy. Easy to install, to be pretty and to be friendly and Ubuntu did that to Debian.
Nobody should start to undertake a large project. You start with a small trivial project, and you should never expect it to get large. If you do, you'll just overdesign and generally think it is more important than it likely is at that stage. Or worse, you might be scared away by the sheer size of the work you envision. So start small, and think about the details. Don't think about some big picture and fancy design. If it doesn't solve some fairly immediate need, it's almost certainly over-designed. And don't expect people to jump in and help you. That's not how these things work. You need to get something half-way useful first, and then others will say "hey, that almost works for me", and they'll get involved in the project.
-- Pi
Just out of curiosity, is it posible to have a voice conference?
What do you mean skype dosent work? I use it.
...oh? *tilts head*
-- Pi
-- pi
There's already an irc channel. ##fur-dev on anthrochat.
Yep, it's a great idea, something for each one know what to do.
As an idea, I would say, using a dynamic page, with everyone registered, and team work groups on it, or something; so each one know what to do, and organize between all the others that would be doing the same.
By the way, I hate social networks and so xD .
How about at first we assemble the tools we will need to start the project, then think about the project itself? I guess that way we're going to complete our goals faster.
Also, there's no chance in hell FA is going to let anyone direct
queries at their database. I'm not sure where you got the idea that
this would be a feasible thing in general, as most websites do not
expose such services.
-- Pi
I'd rather not.
> nobody cares, they mock and make fun of the idea... so we need features, REAL
> features. something to offer except just putting pretty pictures for the
> backgrounds and having a little icon theme... if thats all any of yall are
> interested in making then i agree with the FA forum posts.
No, in fact. That's what I've been ASKING about. What is the aim of this
project? I've asked 5 times and gotten 6 different, contradictory, nonanswers.
> and i know what an OS and what it does. what im TRYING to do is make a
> completely new interface, not a window based or desktop based UI... im
> talking about making a android feeling UI but still maintaining the full
> functionality of a PC.
Okay. This is a new goal that I haven't heard before.
> so windows will be very compact. so what im getting at is we will be
> basically making our own window manager... not necissarily from the ground up
> but in the end it wont resemble any existing window manager...
Okay. We'll need someone familiar with ICCCM, EMWH, and the X11 protocol. Do
you know anyone? Do you have any window managers in mind to base off of? Can
you at least make *mockups* of your interface ideas?
> as far as new content. i think we should leave the background pics up to the
> user asside from including 8 or 10 pre packaged wallpaper images....also,
> about space constraints were going to build the os to fit on a DVD... if
> some one doesnt have a DVD drive... then they need to get one. especially if
> they are on this DEV team, its 2011 people... and as far as hard drive
> space,were really not going to worry about so much. the main thing is RAM...
This would be something that release engineering should be informed of. Who is
release engineering? How does an OS image get built? Is there release
automation? Testing? *What is going on???*
> and on point 4... we will be making a list of included programs and yes we
> will be making more than one version, but we need to finnish what were
> chewing on now before we take another bite. witch is just simply getting our
> ideas onto paper and building an alpha
Excuse me for asking this yet again, but WHAT are we "chewing on now"?
Who is in charge of this thing?
> and yes if some one can track down any furry programs. those will be put in
> as well.
> i do know we will be including all the basics...
> open office.
> firefox
> trillian (if theres a linux version)
... Are you serious? You're trying to build an OS and you don't know
what software you want to package, or even if the software exists on
the OS in question? Really?
> firestorm SL viewer.
> as far as usuing anything that needs licensing. thats what donations will be
> for.
>
> and with all due respect as far as having something to show... thats what im
> working on. im trying to get this all up and going. but seems like all
> anyone can do is question everything we or i do. witch further delays the
> prgress of actually having anything done.
I'm asking fairly important questions and it's really disturbing that I keep
getting completely different and manifestly insane answers. You're trying to
build an OS and nobody here can explain the *build procedure*?
> and i ask all of you on this team, while you are comming up with your ideas
> and when building this OS remember its about the comunity, and connecting it
> and sharing a common interest. not so much about the art. though there will
> be furry themed icons and boot up screens wall papers ect . but the main
> focus is not an "furry art OS" but a "furry community OS"
>
> Sincerely, Current Project Lead, CrazdFoxx. :3
You're the... fifth, sixth "current project lead" on this thing, by the by.
>
> and i know what an OS and what it does. what im TRYING to do is make a
> completely new interface, not a window based or desktop based UI... im
> talking about making a android feeling UI but still maintaining the full
> functionality of a PC. so windows will be very compact. so what im
> getting at is we will be basically making our own window manager... not
> necissarily from the ground up but in the end it wont resemble any
> existing window manager...
Wow, that's ambitious.
Unfortunately, there's no sensible way to get rid from the concept of the window, but there are sensible ways to manage them. You're not the first guy in history who thinks that the one from OS "Windows" is not a good one. But PCs need good multitasking, so a purely Android-like approach won't work either. From this idea arose tiling window managers, like "awesome" or "xmonad". They are good, but they all have one con: they're purely keyboard-driven and one can't use them without reading a long manual first. Having an intuitive GUI-driven one would be awesome (and guys from elementary project know this as well).
The idea is awesome, but it's not exclusively furry. The whole free desktop ecosystem would benefit from it. By declaring the project furry you narrow your target audience and, consequently, the number of contributors by at least 1000 times. And you don't seem to gain anything from declaring it furry.
So, stop calling it furry and it will be done. (actually, doing it means stopping toying with furry projects and hacking real stuff which is usually pretty generic, but I didn't say it.)
> if snatsel
> ever comes back he will be a leader as well. but idk... has anyone heard
> from him???
I'm kind of offline till the 24th of August.
And, face it, I'm not a good manager.
> if hes not apart of the group anymore we need to know,
> anyways...
"a part" or "apart"?
I'll personally miss you, but it's your choice after all. Farewell.