No, indeed, they haven't. I've been watching this project for a few
years and seen exactly nothing get done in the process. For a long
while, nobody was certain which distribution the thing was going to be
based on; at another point there was some confusion among everyone
involved regarding what the project actually -was-. It has flipflopped
between a Linux distro, a theme for a linux distro, a package manager
"optimized for dialup" that uses BitTorrent, and a project to patch
GTK for... some reason.
> and I think the only way to fix this is to re-organize how we want to work
> and what everyone does.
That is generally how this project has been going for the entire time
I've been watching it. "Nothing happens! We should reorganize!"
> in other words, we need to make sure everyone has specific tasks they will
> be doing.
Yes. This goes without saying. This is not a new result.
Again, the entire time I've been watching this project, it's been a
gigantic orgy of "PAINT THE BIKESHED BLUE" from all corners. It's
amusing to watch, but in the end, it boils down to "xyzzy: nothing
happens".
> I imagine this to be done by defiding the team into smaller team groups.
> for example the groups we can have would then be:
> Develoblah blah blah i want to play clubhouse
This is playing pretend bureaucracy, and hence this is not getting
work done. Stop that.
> if anyone has other ideas, say so, not everyone has the ideas, but if we are
> not going to work together using some standards we are going down.
Hi. I'm your new technical lead. Our target platform is FreeBSD-9 on
i386 and AMD64 with XFCE as the desktop environment. Join ##fur-dev on
irc.anthrochat.net and start screaming at me for being a troll.
Or, we could get work done on actually making an OS. Your call.