Clinton sought end-run around counterterrorism bureau on night of Benghazi attack, witness will say

3 views
Skip to first unread message

lew

unread,
May 6, 2013, 6:53:11 AM5/6/13
to opendeb...@googlegroups.com

Clinton sought end-run around counterterrorism bureau on night of Benghazi attack, witness will say

By James Rosen, Chad Pergram

Published May 06, 2013

FoxNews.com

  • libya_embassy1.jpg

    The U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames during a protest by an armed group said to have been protesting a film being produced in the United States September 11, 2012.

On the night of Sept. 11, as the Obama administration scrambled to respond to the Benghazi terror attacks, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a key aide effectively tried to cut the department's own counterterrorism bureau out of the chain of reporting and decision-making, according to a "whistle-blower" witness from that bureau who will soon testify to the charge before Congress, Fox News has learned.

That witness is Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy coordinator for operations in the agency’s counterterrorism bureau. Sources tell Fox News Thompson will level the allegation against Clinton during testimony on Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

Fox News has also learned that another official from the counterterrorism bureau -- independently of Thompson -- voiced the same complaint about Clinton and Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy to trusted national security colleagues back in October.

Extremists linked to Al Qaeda stormed the American consulate and a nearby annex on Sept. 11, in a heavily armed and well-coordinated eight-hour assault that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, and three other Americans.

Thompson considers himself a whistle-blower whose account was suppressed by the official investigative panel that Clinton convened to review the episode, the Accountability Review Board (ARB). Thompson's lawyer, Joseph diGenova, a former U.S. attorney, has further alleged that his client has been subjected to threats and intimidation by as-yet-unnamed superiors at State, in advance of his cooperation with Congress.

Sources close to the congressional investigation who have been briefed on what Thompson will testify tell Fox News the veteran counterterrorism official concluded on Sept. 11 that Clinton and Kennedy tried to cut the counterterrorism bureau out of the loop as they and other Obama administration officials weighed how to respond to -- and characterize -- the Benghazi attacks.

"You should have seen what (Clinton) tried to do to us that night," the second official in State's counterterrorism bureau told colleagues back in October.  Those comments would appear to be corroborated by Thompson's forthcoming testimony.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki called the counterterrorism officials' allegation "100 percent false." A spokesman for Clinton said tersely that the charge is not true.

Thompson's attorney, diGenova, would not comment for this article.

Documents from the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Council, first published in the May 13 edition of "The Weekly Standard," showed that senior officials from those agencies decided within days of the attacks to delete all references to Al Qaeda's known involvement in them from "talking points" being prepared for those administration officers being sent out to discuss the attacks publicly.

Those talking points -- and indeed, the statements of all senior Obama administration officials who commented publicly on Benghazi during the early days after the attacks -- sought instead to depict the Americans' deaths as the result of a spontaneous protest that went awry. The administration later acknowledged that there had been no such protest, as evidence mounted that Al Qaeda-linked terrorists had participated in the attacks. The latter conclusion had figured prominently in the earliest CIA drafts of the talking points, but was stricken by an ad hoc group of senior officials controlling the drafting process. Among those involved in prodding the deletions, the documents published by "The Weekly Standard" show, was State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, who wrote at one point that the revisions were not sufficient to satisfy "my building's leadership."

The allegations of the two counterterrorism officials stand to return the former secretary of state to the center of the Benghazi story. Widely regarded as a leading potential candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016, Clinton has insisted she was not privy to decisions made by underlings about the inadequate security for the U.S. installations in Benghazi that were made in the run-up to the attacks. And she has portrayed her role -- once the attacks became known in Washington -- as that of a determined fact-finder who worked with colleagues to fashion the best possible response to the crisis.

Clinton testified about Benghazi for the first and only time in January of this year, shortly before leaving office. She had long delayed her testimony, at first because she cited the need for the ARB to complete its report, and then because she suffered a series of untimely health problems that included a stomach virus, a concussion sustained during a fall at home, and a blood clot near her brain, from which she has since recovered. However, Clinton was never interviewed by the ARB she convened.

Fox News disclosed last week that the conduct of the ARB is itself now under review by the State Department's Office of Inspector General. A department spokesman said the OIG probe is examining all prior ARBs, not just the one established after Benghazi.

The counterterrorism officials, however, concluded that Clinton and Kennedy were immediately wary of the attacks being portrayed as acts of terrorism, and accordingly worked to prevent the counterterrorism bureau from having a role in the department's early decision-making relating to them.

Also appearing before the oversight committee on Wednesday will be Gregory N. Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya at the time of the Benghazi terrorist attacks. Like Thompson, Hicks is a career State Department official who considers himself a Benghazi whistle-blower. His attorney, Victoria Toensing, a former chief counsel to the Senate Intelligence Committee, has charged that Hicks, too, has faced threats of reprisal from unnamed superiors at State. (Toensing and diGenova, who are representing their respective clients pro bono, are married.)

Portions of the forthcoming testimony of Hicks -- who was one of the last people to speak to Stevens, and who upon the ambassador's death became the senior U.S. diplomat in Libya -- were made public by Rep. Issa during an appearance on the CBS News program "Face the Nation" on Sunday.

Hicks told the committee that he and his colleagues on the ground in Libya that night knew instantly that Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and that he was astonished that no one drafting the administration's talking points consulted with him before finalizing them, or before U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice delivered them on the Sunday talk shows of Sept. 16.

Hicks was interviewed by the ARB but Thompson was not, sources close to the committee's investigation tell Fox News.



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/06/clinton-sought-end-run-around-counterterrorism-bureau-on-night-benghazi-attack/#ixzz2SVayQ0Vz

jose-uno

unread,
May 9, 2013, 12:08:06 AM5/9/13
to opendeb...@googlegroups.com

"Where was all that concern for our men and women serving in embassies and consulates across the globe when all the other attacks and killings occurred?

Like in 2002 when the US Consulate in the Karachi, Pakistan, was attacked and 10 were killed?

Or in 2004 when the US embassy in Uzbekistan was attacked and two were killed and another nine injured?

How about in 2004, when the US Consulate in Saudi Arabia was stormed and 8 lost their lives?

There is more: In 2006, armed men attacked the US Embassy in Syria and one was murdered.

Then in 2007 a grenade was thrown at the US Embassy in Athens.

In 2008, the US Embassy in Serbia was set on fire.

In 2008, bombings in the US Embassy in Yemen killed 10.

Notice the dates, all before the Obama administration.

Not yet convinced that all the noise over Benghazi has nothing to do with love of countryman? How about the biggest, most catastrophic attack and murder of Americans? As a New Yorker, Sept. 11, 2001, is indelibly imprinted on my psyche and I’m sure on the rest of the country. 3,000 perished in the most brutal act of terror in our recent history—all under a Republican administration. George W. Bush and his team had nine warnings that al-Qaida would attack within the United States, but they did absolutely nothing. No one in that administration’s head rolled for that stunning incompetence.

But Republicans now want President Obama’s head for Benghazi.

Here is an excerpt from the Ninth Public Hearing of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, held Thursday April 8, 2004, where Bush adviser Condoleezza Rice, is being questioned:

MS. RICE: I remember very well that the president was aware that there were issues inside the United States. He talked to people about this. But I don't remember the al Qaeda cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.

“MR. BEN-VENISTE: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the Aug. 6 PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB.

MS. RICE: I believe the title was "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States." Now, the PDB --

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Thank you."

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/13333916-number-of-embassies-attacked-during-the-bush-years-before-benghazi-many

Larry Talbot

unread,
May 9, 2013, 8:23:53 AM5/9/13
to opendeb...@googlegroups.com
It's ok if people die in those situations when ther is a Neo Con in office .Come on, Jose! Don't you know by now that Knuckledragger Ideology hypocrisy goes only so far?
 

Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 21:08:06 -0700
From: p...@wtxs.net
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Clinton sought end-run around counterterrorism bureau on night of Benghazi attack, witness will say
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

plainolamerican

unread,
May 9, 2013, 5:06:10 PM5/9/13
to Open Debate Political Forum IMHO
It's ok if people die in those situations when ther is a Neo Con in
office
---
there's always neocons in office.

we must remove the zionist neocons, both xian and jewish, from our
government asap by any means necessary.

On May 9, 7:23 am, Larry Talbot <larry.tal...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It's ok if people die in those situations when ther is a Neo Con in office .Come on, Jose! Don't you know by now that Knuckledragger Ideology hypocrisy goes only so far?
> BEN-VENISTE: Thank you."http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/13333916-number-of-embassie...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, May 6, 2013 5:53:11 AM UTC-5, lew wrote:Clinton sought end-run around  counterterrorism bureau on night of Benghazi attack, witness will sayBy James Rosen, Chad PergramPublished May 06, 2013FoxNews.comThe U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames during a protest by an armed  group said to have been protesting a film being produced in the United States  September 11, 2012.On the night of Sept. 11, as the Obama administration scrambled to respond to  the Benghazi terror attacks, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a key  aide effectively tried to cut the department's own counterterrorism bureau out  of the chain of reporting and decision-making, according to a "whistle-blower"  witness from that bureau who will soon testify to the charge before Congress,  Fox News has learned.That witness is Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy  coordinator for operations in the agency’s counterterrorism bureau. Sources tell  Fox News Thompson will level the allegation against Clinton during testimony on  Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by  Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.Fox News has also learned that another official from the counterterrorism  bureau -- independently of Thompson -- voiced the same complaint about Clinton  and Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy to trusted national security  colleagues back in October.Extremists linked to Al Qaeda stormed the American consulate and a nearby  annex on Sept. 11, in a heavily armed and well-coordinated eight-hour assault  that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, and three other  Americans.Thompson considers himself a whistle-blower whose account was suppressed by  the official investigative panel that Clinton convened to review the episode,  the Accountability Review Board (ARB). Thompson's lawyer, Joseph diGenova, a  former U.S. attorney, has further alleged that his client has been subjected to  threats and intimidation by as-yet-unnamed superiors at State, in advance of his  cooperation with Congress.Sources close to the congressional investigation who have been briefed on  what Thompson will testify tell Fox News the veteran counterterrorism official  concluded on Sept. 11 that Clinton and Kennedy tried to cut the counterterrorism  bureau out of the loop as they and other Obama administration officials weighed  how to respond to -- and characterize -- the Benghazi attacks."You should have seen what (Clinton) tried to do to us that night," the  second official in State's counterterrorism bureau told colleagues back in  October.  Those comments would appear to be corroborated by Thompson's  forthcoming testimony.State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki called the counterterrorism officials'  allegation "100 percent false." A spokesman for Clinton said tersely that the  charge is not true.Thompson's attorney, diGenova, would not comment for this article.Documents from the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and the  National Security Council, first published in the May 13 edition of "The Weekly  Standard," showed that senior officials from those agencies decided within days  of the attacks to delete all references to Al Qaeda's known involvement in them  from "talking points" being prepared for those administration officers being  sent out to discuss the attacks publicly.Those talking points -- and indeed, the statements of all senior Obama  administration officials who commented publicly on Benghazi during the early  days after the attacks -- sought instead to depict the Americans' deaths as the  result of a spontaneous protest that went awry. The administration later  acknowledged that there had been no such protest, as evidence mounted that Al  Qaeda-linked terrorists had participated in the attacks. The latter conclusion  had figured prominently in the earliest CIA drafts of the talking points, but  was stricken by an ad hoc group of senior officials controlling the drafting  process. Among those involved in prodding the deletions, the documents published  by "The Weekly Standard" show, was State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland,  who wrote at one point that the revisions were not sufficient to satisfy "my  building's leadership."The allegations of the two counterterrorism officials stand to return the  former secretary of state to the center of the Benghazi story. Widely regarded  as a leading potential candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination in  2016, Clinton has insisted she was not privy to decisions made by underlings  about the inadequate security for the U.S. installations in Benghazi that were  made in the run-up to the attacks. And she has portrayed her role -- once the  attacks became known in Washington -- as that of a determined fact-finder who  worked with colleagues to fashion the best possible response to the crisis.Clinton testified about Benghazi for the first and only time in January of  this year, shortly before leaving office. She had long delayed her testimony, at  first because she cited the need for the ARB to complete its report, and then  because she suffered a series of untimely health problems that included a  stomach virus, a concussion sustained during a fall at home, and a blood clot  near her brain, from which she has since recovered. However, Clinton was never  interviewed by the ARB she convened.Fox News disclosed last week that the conduct of the ARB is itself now under  review by the State Department's Office of Inspector General. A department  spokesman said the OIG probe is examining all prior ARBs, not just the one  established after Benghazi.The counterterrorism officials, however, concluded that Clinton and Kennedy  were immediately wary of the attacks being portrayed as acts of terrorism, and  accordingly worked to prevent the counterterrorism bureau from having a role in  the department's early decision-making relating to them.Also appearing before the oversight committee on Wednesday will be Gregory N.  Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya at the time of  the Benghazi terrorist attacks. Like Thompson, Hicks is a career State  Department official who considers himself a Benghazi whistle-blower. His  attorney, Victoria Toensing, a former chief counsel to the Senate Intelligence  Committee, has charged that Hicks, too, has faced threats of reprisal from  unnamed superiors at State. (Toensing and diGenova, who are representing their  respective clients pro bono, are married.)Portions of the forthcoming testimony of Hicks -- who was one of the last  people to speak to Stevens, and who upon the ambassador's death became the  senior U.S. diplomat in Libya -- were made public by Rep. Issa during an  appearance on the CBS News program "Face the Nation" on Sunday.Hicks told the committee that he and his colleagues on the ground in Libya  that night knew instantly that Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and that he was  astonished that no one drafting the administration's talking points consulted  with him before finalizing them, or before U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice delivered  them on the Sunday talk shows of Sept. 16.Hicks was interviewed by the ARB but Thompson was not, sources close to the
>
> ...
>
> read more »
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages