> I meant 0.001%
That math number is wrong. 23.976 vs 24.000 is 100.1% or 99.9% - or 100.001 (without the percent sign)
>. Our problem is that the audio reports more frames than
> the video in our MXF wrapping stage. Please help. We are at a loss and
> need some assistance.
It can be hard to wrap your head around 23.976 to 24.000 conversion. 23.976 is a slower frame rate that 24.000. Material that is 23.976 is played at 24.000 will be sped up (i.e. playback faster or short in overall duration). Audio, however is a set duration, so it will be longer, i.e. OpenDCP will report as more frames if it is longer in duration than the project at 24.000
Audio must be shorted by a 100.1% speedup (some programs used 99.9%) so it is shorter in duration exactly in sync with playing the frames of 23.976 project at 24.000 fps.
However, if you interpolate your frames to get to 24.000, picture duration is identical and audio will there for be unchanged.
stephen van vuuren
336.202.4777
http://www.insaturnsrings.com/
http://www.sv2dcp.com/
http://www.sv2studios.com/
A film is – or should be – more like music than like fiction. It should be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what’s behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes later.
–Stanley Kubrick