ConceptNode lojban gibberish

[Nil Geisweiller]

Just read http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Link_Parse_to_Logic_via_Lojban the
proposal looks awesome to me.

Just curious, where the prefix gibberish of node names such as

PredicateNode (stv 1.0 0.0) "nMtuPfmIJBTgtPV),5on___mi'arpe'u"

come from?

Also it occurs to me that the pattern miner can be seen as a big ass PLN
rule, and thus should be callable by the BC (or an adequately customized
version of it), as opposed to be solely used in conjunction with the FC
as described.

Nil

[Ben Goertzel]

I believe it's an instance node, which we'd normally write as

PredicateNode "mi'arpe'u_123"

or some such...

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to opencog+u...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to ope...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/4bbdb5aa-c2b6-1791-bb2a-425180c6de9b%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

“I tell my students, when you go to these meetings, see what direction
everyone is headed, so you can go in the opposite direction. Don’t
polish the brass on the bandwagon.” – V. S. Ramachandran

[Nil Geisweiller]

On 11/30/2016 12:58 PM, Nil Geisweiller wrote:
> Also it occurs to me that the pattern miner can be seen as a big ass PLN
> rule, and thus should be callable by the BC (or an adequately customized
> version of it), as opposed to be solely used in conjunction with the FC
> as described.

The advantage of having the BC call the pattern miner is that it can
narrow the search by imposing a certain pattern on the output of the
pattern miner.

Nil