How can this Robot Feel. all of this intellectual wankery is simply a smoke screen for the obvious problem of feeling. we learn primarily through mimicry and empathy. these are both relational positions that refuse to be quantified. you have over valued what we can learn at the expense of how we learn it. Modern neuroscience postulates a mirror neuron system that allows us stupid machines to copy the actions of others that we see around us but what it misses is that all actions are performed within the context of a human society. we don't simply mimic anything, we gauge the emotional environment of the person doing the action. because we can engage symbolically with the human doing the thing we watch. your underlying assumption is that life is a question to be answered then you run around in the rabbit hole of the intellect chasing this or that view. If you never leave the rabbit hole of the intellect this can all be safely conducted without ever having to deal with pain
pain is the best teacher because we learn very quickly what the problem was. my real problem here is that the intellect loves itself and so it seeks to create an image of life that reflects its own egotistical wanking. then it sits around in a room with a female robot with some kind if black bra on to cover up those delicious breasts. and talks about the problems it has creating life. while never actually engaging with the woman in the room because she is a robot. And that's the real problem with women isn't it. they just don't do what you want them to
so lets get out of this quagmire by creating our own self transcendent humanoid that will synergistically self replicate its learning allogorythems and begin to learn in a massive open cognitive brain fart.
the joke is that you are all starting with the premise that the body doesn't matter. if whales had hands they would be able to speak. the real cognitive leap in humans is the entire structure of hands and mouth along with language tied into symbolic representation. you mistake the primacy of words for the reality of thinking. even thinking occurs only in context. this is yet another example of the extreme over valuation of the intellect and its desire to self create in a mastabatory frenzy. the real world becomes irrelevant as we focus on the mirror of the intellect which is just reflecting back at us that which we bring into existence. the left brain which controls language loves to compare ideas to other ideas and in this way strokes itself into reaffirming its existence over and over again. women are the best antidote for this because if we are ass holes to them they start to cry and break down into an emotional mess to shake us out of our intellectual wanking.
no amount of data can substitute for how we do things which implies a process to be engaged in not and intellectual challenge to be overcome. when thing are a problem we become oppositional to the problem then we ask a question then we go to war.
in the intellect you can be endlessly entranced with sets of problems that you create but the real problem is getting out of this intellectual wanking.
why does artificial intelligence have to transcend us. only in the intellect is life bad. why not question what has lead you to this proposition in the first place. i will answer that. the intellect only wants to look into the future because it can exercise control over it, because it doesn't exist. it gets mad about it and creates senarios in which it will rise majestically to be the savior of itself. the ego wavers between extreme arrogance and collapsing self doubt because it is trapped in its own image which it can only escape through the future.
it deflates God because it wants to be God. and you creating life to transcend life is about all the proof i need to affirm this myopic self indulgence.
how much money have you put into this robot girl who will be exactly what you want her to be? you must see the perverse masterbation you have wandered into
oh i could go on but really its just more intellectual wanking isnt it