Message in math
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Eric Burton
Mar 24, 2012, 3:47:12 PM3/24/12
to singularity, agi, sl4, biotaconv, blaczar, Max Action, Matt Winkfein, emmanuel, krallopian, krallopian2, letters, scottospence, Mary Tanner, grebin, S H, S H, Nancy Jobbitt, Susan Cook, singularity-aliens, Bradley Ansell, Brad Carter, bda...@digitalspace.com, Charles Catalano, Clemn XL, cacophonihil, Clive Chamberlain, Cory Marriott, darkmagerebirth, darwinathome, David McKendrick, Dante-Gabryell Monson, Darin White, Da...@review.com, Mind Encode, Emma Ward-McNally, Evan Dwinnell, Newton Erin, evolve-40-...@googlegroups.com, Lorin Halpert, Samantha Martin, Luke Loughead, Keith Henson, Bruce Klein, karma, Larry Yaeger, lferridge, Rat Man, missingrael, Nicholas Stanley, Herve NOEL, Nefarious Rex, D.net Discussion, nime, nime, Roy Waidler, opencog, John Ohno, opense...@graffiti.net, openc...@googlegroups.com, unicorn pirate, po2okemon, pkeffect, Rudolf Nico Penninkhof, Steve Plimpton, Jeffrey Rubard, John G. Rose, Tique, Terry J Price, toadyone, t...@theendoftime.org, t...@worldofruin.net, uncerta...@singinst.org, usr...@arbornet.org, redge von, MARZIO VENEMAN, Ryan Voots, vinb...@gmail.com, Mark Waser, Trent Waddington, senator.xenophon, YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤), zelda_...@hotmail.com, Transhumanists in Australia and New Zealand
Look if you take powers of 2 and sum the digits in them it says
1 2 4 8 7 5 1 2 4 8 7 5 1 2
The 487 is a math chip on earth. But if you subtract the low digit from the high one for the two-digit numbers -and- extend the rule -arbitrarily- for the three-and-more-digit powers of two, you can print,
1 2 4 8 5 1 2 5 1 2 5 1 2
Without saying 4 8 7 at all. Not only does it say "512", one of the first three-digit powers of 2, one digit sooner than the summing-only way, all the digits that said 487, the chip we have on earth, with ten fingers and base ten, what, hold on, in-between the 512's, the powers of 2 summing to print 487 over and over all say 512 in sequence instead or can. The rule where you subtract the low from the high digit only works on 16 32 and 64. For like 128 it's just you -could- say (8-2)-1 and get 5. You could also get 6 or 7. But for 256 you can say (2+5)-6 and get 1. You can keep printing 512 if you want one of the first powers of two you can't represent uniquely or sort of at all that way
If you just use sums of digits it goes 487512 over and over, one of the first powers of 2 you can't represent uniquely in base 10 that way, 512, which sums to 8 which you'd have already used, and the 487 a math chip on earth so
Oh no try this in other bases
http://arbornet.org/~flamoot/telepathic-critterdrug.html links all the toys
Messages in math are older than messages in language
I think reality, might be a simulation
Cheers flam
1 2 4 8 7 5 1 2 4 8 7 5 1 2
The 487 is a math chip on earth. But if you subtract the low digit from the high one for the two-digit numbers -and- extend the rule -arbitrarily- for the three-and-more-digit powers of two, you can print,
1 2 4 8 5 1 2 5 1 2 5 1 2
Without saying 4 8 7 at all. Not only does it say "512", one of the first three-digit powers of 2, one digit sooner than the summing-only way, all the digits that said 487, the chip we have on earth, with ten fingers and base ten, what, hold on, in-between the 512's, the powers of 2 summing to print 487 over and over all say 512 in sequence instead or can. The rule where you subtract the low from the high digit only works on 16 32 and 64. For like 128 it's just you -could- say (8-2)-1 and get 5. You could also get 6 or 7. But for 256 you can say (2+5)-6 and get 1. You can keep printing 512 if you want one of the first powers of two you can't represent uniquely or sort of at all that way
If you just use sums of digits it goes 487512 over and over, one of the first powers of 2 you can't represent uniquely in base 10 that way, 512, which sums to 8 which you'd have already used, and the 487 a math chip on earth so
Oh no try this in other bases
http://arbornet.org/~flamoot/telepathic-critterdrug.html links all the toys
Messages in math are older than messages in language
I think reality, might be a simulation
Cheers flam
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages