On 2014年02月12日 11:27, Tao Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think what is special about the OpenBoard is the amazing expandability
> of the FPGA, which provides many possibilities of HW algorithm
> acceleration and connectivity of peripherals.
yea, OpenRISC,often abbrev as OR, is the most complete open source
hardware in the world. It is one part of OpenBRD and led by Rill now.
>
> For the processor, there are too many options, such as Allwinner, MTK,
> Intel Quark and so on. All of them have limited peripheral interfaces,
> made for a certain field of application (e.g. Smart phones or tablets).
> But the OpenRisc is different; you can play with the CPU architecture,
> IP cores, low latency data processing and various of interface protocols.
>
OR also has a shortage of low speed clock and higher cost (compare to
popular SoC).
> Thus I suggest the OpenBoard should insist on FPGA,
the thing that
that's right, we are just starting to do that.
> distinguishes the OpenBoard form many other platforms in the market.
> And we should expand the IP libraries, connectivities and applications
> step by step in the community.
i could not agree more.
Shall the CPU speed (or 3G baseband) be
> a problem, a general application processor could be added on the PCB as
> a co-processor.
It is a really good idea.
I just talked to Reking about his idea of combining Arduino(avr) and
imx233(arm9) together.
P.S. the history of OpenBRD
openbrd is abbreviation of openboard before i met Rill.
the initial idea of openbrd is to make a development board for arm SoC
with open source schematic and pcb layout.
now, the meaning of OpenBRD has been expanded to 3 aspects for open
source hardware.
B stands for the PCB Board with open schematic and pcb layout file.
R stands for the OR (OpenRISC) with open source verilog code
D stands for the open source debuggers such as JTAG etc.
these shall cover everything related to open source hardware in now days.
regarding the ASIC processor versions, i treat them as complementary
boards to the "B".
> cubieboard仅是开放原理图,这仍然不能算是真正的open hardware, 但至少
> 比RPi强些。
>
> 所以提出来请大家讨论,下一代(其实不应说是下一代,而是高配款)是否可
> 以考虑Allwinner的处理器呢?
>
> 或有其他更好的替代?比如仍沿用freescale的imx6系列?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To subscribe OpenBRD mailing list, send to
ope...@googlegroups.com with
> subject as "subscribe"
> (( 订阅 OpenBoard 邮件讨论组,编写主题为“订阅”的邮件发至
>
ope...@googlegroups.com ))