"Cites" count not "Cited by"

48 views
Skip to first unread message

Laura Bredahl

unread,
Jan 22, 2025, 9:20:42 AMJan 22
to OpenAlex Community
Hi,

I was looking at the record level data and I am a bit confused by the "Cites" count. It doesn't equal the number of references in the article (if you link to the HTML you can compare). What is the "Cites" counting? And if it is the references in the work then why is it lower than it should be?

Here's an example:
"Cites = 18" --> from OpenAlex
but in reality there are 32 references

I probably have a cascade of follow-up questions but I'll leave it there for now.
Laura
BRIL @ UWaterloo

Krugs.de

unread,
Jan 22, 2025, 10:27:38 AMJan 22
to Laura Bredahl, OpenAlex Community
`cites` refers to, if I am not mistaken, to the number of references - correct. But only the references which are found in OpenAlex. So there are 32 - 18 references, which are not in OpenAlex.

But what is more interesting: on the site which opens when you click on the `18` in cites, shows only 10 references, no second page, but in the stats section on the right, it says 18. If I change the records per page to 100, I see all 18.

So there seems to be a bug in the UI?

Rainer

On 22 Jan 2025, at 15:20, Laura Bredahl <laura....@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenAlex Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openalex-commun...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openalex-community/5e2d48ce-92c6-46f1-9237-ee28e02660e9n%40googlegroups.com.

Anders Wändahl

unread,
Jan 23, 2025, 10:35:45 AMJan 23
to openalex-...@googlegroups.com

It's weird! The links for "Cites: 18" and "Cited by: 5" go to

https://openalex.org/works?page=1&filter=cited_by%3Aw3092589413
https://openalex.org/works?page=1&filter=cites%3Aw3092589413

respectively, so they are swapped for some reason.

Anders

Anders Wändahl

unread,
Jan 23, 2025, 10:35:49 AMJan 23
to openalex-...@googlegroups.com

My confusion, this is of course correct and logical...
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages