Hi All,
Has anyone else noticed inaccurate corresponding author metadata? I know that the is_corresponding field is a work in progress, and I was expecting missing data, but I was surprised by the number of authors misidentified as corresponding.
It seems to be particularly bad for PLOS and journals hosted on Copernicus:
However, it seems to affect multiple publishers:
I have other examples if that’s helpful. May I ask if anyone else has encountered this? And please let me know if I’m misinterpreting.
Thanks!
-Jason
Jason Friedman, BA, MA, MIS
he/him
Assistant Dean, Collections and Discovery
University of Saskatchewan
University Library
Ph: (306) 966-8114
I acknowledge that I live and work on Treaty 6 Territory and the Homeland of the Métis. We pay our respect to the First Nations and Métis ancestors of this place and reaffirm our relationship with one another.