On Aug 16, 11:46 pm, billh04 <
h...@tulane.edu> wrote:
> Not sure about the following.
>
> Without loss of generality (WLOG), we can assume that f(i) = 1 for 0
> <= i <= m else 0.
> Note that interchanging j and k for f corresponds to interchanging -j
> and -k for g.
>
> If f equals 0 for all i (ie, m = -1), then there is nothing to prove.
> Hence, m >= 0.
>
> If f equals 1 for all i (ie, m = p -1), then there is nothing to
> prove. Hence, m < p -1.
>
> If m = 0, then g is the constant function 0. Hence, 0 < m < p - 1.
>
> Each sum now looks like:
>
> g(x-0) + g(x-1) + ... g(x-m - 1) is even.
>
> Add the first and second, second and third, third and fourth, etc. We
> get:
>
> g(0) = g(m)
> g(1) = g(m+1)
> g(2) = g(m+2)
> ....
>
> It follows that g is a constant function.
>
> The details require some work. I didn't check, so the above may not
> work.
>
> Bill Hale
e.g. p=6 and the matrix [ f(m) g(n) ] is: