> Even if solar panels eventually double in price, the cost of building
concentrator and generator will be too high.
Depends. I've got a 1-2 kW concentrator design can be built for less
than 50 euro, Solarfire will do about 20kW for a couple thousand (I
think, should check). I'm working on a very simple steam generator, only
aiming for 12v but it would cost again less than 50 E.
But that's not really the point; concentrated solar, or any heat based
system, isn't about single applications, it's about energy cascades. ie
with a 30 m^2 Solarfire, for example, you put your initial 1000 C into a
steam turbine, the 600 C steam which comes out of that goes into a steam
piston, with the 300 C from that you make biochar or whatever, and the
waste heat from that goes into cooking, heating, hot water etc.
PV doesn't work like that.
> Too many mechanical parts needed, too many moving parts.
My steam engine design has none other than the generator (which would be
a PM motor running reversed), and it's all scrap and OTS parts. Don't
know yet if it actually works, mind, but something like it could be made
to with good enough design.
> But to achieve a dependable round-the-clock electric power supply, You
can't rely on solar and wind only.
True, minus effective storage. Solar can be stored as heat for hours to
days in insulated tanks, and indefinitely in certain chemical-change
solutions once they figure out how to do that cheaply. Also solid state
as charcoal. Wind can be stored as compressed air, pumped water etc. The
sun might only shine a fraction of the year, but it shines a lot when it
does, so as long as your energy capture system is cheap and effective
enough you just catch shedloads of the stuff while it's available.
> biomass seems to be the best option.
Biomass is indeed an excellent and versatile option.
> biomass burner -> steam generator -> steam engine -> electric
generator. Not a combination with a solar concentrator.
Seems an all-of-the-above option would make the most sense...
Regarding why this group has dried up, I'd say it's likely the same
reason the parent OSEE group went the same way: talk is easy. Actually
making stuff takes the conscious decision to do so and everyone's busy.