Plate solving isn't part of PHD2 for a number of reasons. First, the guide camera frames often have a pretty small field of view, and more importantly, they reference a different part of the sky from your main camera. If you're using an off-axis-guider, the pick-off prism will be outside the main field of view so the guide camera image will normally be offset by at least the radius of the main camera image. If you're using a separate guide scope, it's usually not practical or even necessary to get the two telescopes precisely co-axial. For these reasons, I don't think a plate-solved image through the guider is very useful and isn't appropriate for synching the mount. If you feel the need to pursue this, you can acquire guide camera image frames through the PHD2 event server and then do the plate-solving yourself. A different question though is whether you need to do any of this. Plate-solvers aren't necessarily thrown off by central obstructions or non-stellar bright areas - have you tried plate-solving an image through the main camera? I'm attaching an example of a field with a large black rectangle in the center of the frame and it can be plate-solved very quickly.
Beyond all that, adding plate-solving to PHD2 would involve a lot of configuration, installation, and support headaches that we don't really want to deal with given the limited value of the end-result. We have a substantial number of PHD2 users who do spectroscopy so I assume they've found workable solutions without the need for any new features in PHD2.
Regards,
Bruce