Room for improvement?

34 views
Skip to first unread message

NY2KW

unread,
Aug 1, 2026, 4:06:13 PM (4 days ago) Aug 1
to Open PHD Guiding
My Wave 150i mount has been guiding my RC 71 WIFD with an ASI120MM mini fairly well. On nights with no significant wind I usually see total rms error ~0.7.  I have run Guiding Asst  a few times. Is there room for improvement by further adjustment of any parameters? As its a wide-field scope, star elongation isn't that noticeable.

Thanks in advance.

Bruce Waddington

unread,
Aug 1, 2026, 4:53:06 PM (4 days ago) Aug 1
to Open PHD Guiding
This looks pretty good.  I think you should try using the PPEC algorithm for RA to reduce the residual periodic error:

RA_FFT.jpg

In the algorithms tab in Advanced Settings, choose PPEC for RA, then set the period length to 286 and un-check the box for 'Auto-adjust period'.  

I notice you're re-using a calibration from June, is this a permanent set-up?

Regards,
Bruce

Jerry Stern

unread,
Aug 1, 2026, 9:53:09 PM (4 days ago) Aug 1
to open-phd...@googlegroups.com

HI Bruce,

 

Yes, It’s on a permanent pier at StarFront in Texas. I’ve had more clear nights imaging there in the last 4 weeks than the entire past 12 months at home in NY.  Will switch to PPEC @ 286

 

Thanks again

 

BR

Jerry

 

From: open-phd...@googlegroups.com <open-phd...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Bruce Waddington
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2026 4:53 PM
To: Open PHD Guiding <open-phd...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [open-phd-guiding] Re: Room for improvement?

 

This looks pretty good.  I think you should try using the PPEC algorithm for RA to reduce the residual periodic error:

 

 

In the algorithms tab in Advanced Settings, choose PPEC for RA, then set the period length to 286 and un-check the box for 'Auto-adjust period'.  

 

I notice you're re-using a calibration from June, is this a permanent set-up?

 

Regards,

Bruce

 

On Saturday, August 1, 2026 at 1:06:13 PM UTC-7 NY2KW wrote:

My Wave 150i mount has been guiding my RC 71 WIFD with an ASI120MM mini fairly well. On nights with no significant wind I usually see total rms error ~0.7.  I have run Guiding Asst  a few times. Is there room for improvement by further adjustment of any parameters? As its a wide-field scope, star elongation isn't that noticeable.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Jerry

 

 

https://openphdguiding.org/logs/dl/PHD2_logs_Ppe6.zip

 

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Open PHD Guiding" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/open-phd-guiding/khuxhXBXulo/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to open-phd-guidi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/699eaaf8-88bd-4be0-bcd1-1465e2c7f285n%40googlegroups.com.

image001.jpg
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages