Hi Sebastian. It’s hard to make much from this, there are very guiding sessions that are long enough to get a clear picture. But even in shorter time periods, it’s pretty clear that the native RA tracking of the mount is quite poor (RA shown in red):
These large, abrupt excursions in RA will kill your guiding results and they are probably originating in the RA mount mechanics – they can’t be guided out by PHD2.
The peculiar difference between the measured RA and Dec guide rates is equally puzzling. The mount driver is reporting that both axis guide speeds are set to 0.5x sidereal, but it’s obvious that the effective rate is much higher for Dec. Look at the difference in the number of steps taken during the calibration:
Dec is obviously moving at a much higher rate – in fact, the computed rate is 22.5 arc-sec/sec which is faster than sidereal rate! Are you 100% that your guider focal length is really 180mm ?
Bottom line, the mount/mount driver combination isn’t working nearly well enough to support guiding, so I think you should probably try to get help from the mount supplier. Longer term, I think you should also review our best practices document and incorporate those into your normal operations (especially with regard to doing calibrations):
https://openphdguiding.org/phd2-best-practices/
Good luck,
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Open PHD Guiding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to open-phd-guidi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/d855f2cd-8496-4324-95b1-e6c1c8ca0839n%40googlegroups.com.
Hi again Sebastian. Just to further confirm that the poor RA tracking behavior is in the mount, here’s a look at the native tracking with no guiding being done at all:
A lot of this is coming from the unwelcome 13-sec error that is pretty common to many of these private-label Chinese mounts:
Here’s another forum thread that talks about this.
https://groups.google.com/g/open-phd-guiding/c/xBK_ib-pCMY/m/O6LRBC-pAAAJ
Bruce
From:
bw_msgboard [mailto:bw_m...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2020
12:23 PM
To: 'open-phd...@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [open-phd-guiding]
HEQ5 Pro RA / DEC rates vary... // unsteady guiding
Hi Sebastian. It’s hard to make much from this, there are very guiding sessions that are long enough to get a clear picture. But even in shorter time periods, it’s pretty clear that the native RA tracking of the mount is quite poor (RA shown in red):
These large, abrupt excursions in RA will kill your guiding results and they are probably originating in the RA mount mechanics – they can’t be guided out by PHD2.
The peculiar difference between the measured RA and Dec guide rates is equally puzzling. The mount driver is reporting that both axis guide speeds are set to 0.5x sidereal, but it’s obvious that the effective rate is much higher for Dec. Look at the difference in the number of steps taken during the calibration:
Dec is obviously moving at a much higher rate – in fact, the computed rate is 22.5 arc-sec/sec which is faster than sidereal rate! Are you 100% that your guider focal length is really 180mm ?
Bottom line, the mount/mount driver combination isn’t working nearly well enough to support guiding, so I think you should probably try to get help from the mount supplier. Longer term, I think you should also review our best practices document and incorporate those into your normal operations (especially with regard to doing calibrations):
https://openphdguiding.org/phd2-best-practices/
Good luck,
Bruce
From: open-phd...@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-phd...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Sebastian A. Niklaus
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2020
11:20 AM
To: Open PHD Guiding
Subject: [open-phd-guiding] HEQ5 Pro
RA / DEC rates vary... // unsteady guiding
Dear PHD2 community,
--
Hi Sebastian. Wow, this is very good news! And it strikes me as being a very nice bit of work on your part, definitely an out-of-the-ordinary problem to figure out. Congrats! You probably want to be insure your EQMOD settings follow this guide:
https://github.com/OpenPHDGuiding/phd2/wiki/EQASCOM-Settings
Bruce
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/43dd2130-0b53-4fb0-b15b-c603e9844e3dn%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/43dd2130-0b53-4fb0-b15b-c603e9844e3dn%40googlegroups.com.
I don’t really have anything to add here. Certainly the INDI mount errors need to be corrected. Overall, the Dec axis on your mount doesn’t seem to be moving consistently and reliably even when the INDI errors aren’t being recorded. I would guess your mount has a huge amount of Dec backlash so you should clear it manually before you start a calibration. Running kstars is probably counter-productive until you can get all these mechanical problems sorted out – you should be doing all this stuff manually until you have a clear idea of what’s going on. The mount has to respond consistently, not just “usually”.
Bruce
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/b07a1ed8-dce0-4857-b6f2-af6b108e8370n%40googlegroups.com.
Am 17.03.2021 um 16:00 schrieb bw_msgboard <bw_m...@earthlink.net>:
I don’t really have anything to add here. Certainly the INDI mount errors need to be corrected. Overall, the Dec axis on your mount doesn’t seem to be moving consistently and reliably even when the INDI errors aren’t being recorded. I would guess your mount has a huge amount of Dec backlash so you should clear it manually before you start a calibration. Running kstars is probably counter-productive until you can get all these mechanical problems sorted out – you should be doing all this stuff manually until you have a clear idea of what’s going on. The mount has to respond consistently, not just “usually”.
Bruce
From: open-phd...@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-phd...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of seb...@gmx.de
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:16 PM
To: Open PHD Guiding
Subject: Re: [open-phd-guiding] HEQ5 Pro RA / DEC rates vary... // unsteady guiding
Dear Bruce,
if possible I would like to kindly ask for your opinion on my futher persisting trouble with controlling my heq5 pro mount for guiding. After solving the problem with the synscan driver I switched to indi eqmod. I am trying hard since then but I have intermittend failure in completing calibration as well as the backlash measurement of the guide assistant. The mount sometimes does not respond to south commands during those processes. While experimenting today I also noticed a failure during the star cross test. All these errors just happen in south direction so there is a chance that it is related to the indi eqmod driver but it could also be a command issue. I most carefully adjusted the backlash and when recognized I get around 800ms to 1300ms. I am sure I do not have binding, I turned both axis manually several times. I also tried a second cable via the handcontroller in pc direct mode. Overall I tried phd2 on my raspberry pi as well as in win10 and mac mojave. Goto and long (2,5-5s) phd2 manual guide pulses work usually.
While the star cross test today all commands could be completed. PHD2 commanded west and east movement perfectly as well as the north commands, but when the south movement started I got the debug log of indi redurned:
[2021-03-16T18:04:27.910 CET DEBG ][ org.kde.kstars.indi] - EQMod Mount : "[DEBUG] Timed guide South 1000 ms at rate 13.537 "
[2021-03-16T18:04:27.911 CET DEBG ][ org.kde.kstars.indi] - EQMod Mount : "[DEBUG] StartDETracking() : trackspeed = -13.537 arcsecs/s, computed rate = -0.9 "
[2021-03-16T18:04:27.911 CET DEBG ][ org.kde.kstars.indi] - EQMod Mount : "[DEBUG] SetDERate() : rate = -0.9 "
[2021-03-16T18:04:27.912 CET INFO ][ org.kde.kstars.indi] - EQMod Mount : "[WARNING] Warning: Invalid parameter -> Can not change rate while motor is running (direction differs). "
Guiding speed is set to 0.9x on both axis in the driver. I know PHD2 cannot affect the settings usually.
As all three problems affect south movement in combination with phd2 and today I seen that error I wanted to contact you.
Example for good calibration but bad backlash measurement:
Two nights ago it was a bit windy but right after a perfect calibration I could not complete the backlash measurement:
<image001.gif>
<image002.gif>
Example for good backlash measurment, same setup and guide speeds:
<image003.gif>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Open PHD Guiding" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/open-phd-guiding/fPsnu8o15cA/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to open-phd-guidi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/D69638EB2DA344FABA0B78C56FC0E4AD%40HomeDesktop.
Am 17.03.2021 um 16:00 schrieb bw_msgboard <bw_m...@earthlink.net>:
I don’t really have anything to add here. Certainly the INDI mount errors need to be corrected. Overall, the Dec axis on your mount doesn’t seem to be moving consistently and reliably even when the INDI errors aren’t being recorded. I would guess your mount has a huge amount of Dec backlash so you should clear it manually before you start a calibration. Running kstars is probably counter-productive until you can get all these mechanical problems sorted out – you should be doing all this stuff manually until you have a clear idea of what’s going on. The mount has to respond consistently, not just “usually”.
Bruce
From: open-phd...@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-phd...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of seb...@gmx.de
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:16 PM
To: Open PHD Guiding
Subject: Re: [open-phd-guiding] HEQ5 Pro RA / DEC rates vary... // unsteady guiding
Dear Bruce,
if possible I would like to kindly ask for your opinion on my futher persisting trouble with controlling my heq5 pro mount for guiding. After solving the problem with the synscan driver I switched to indi eqmod. I am trying hard since then but I have intermittend failure in completing calibration as well as the backlash measurement of the guide assistant. The mount sometimes does not respond to south commands during those processes. While experimenting today I also noticed a failure during the star cross test. All these errors just happen in south direction so there is a chance that it is related to the indi eqmod driver but it could also be a command issue. I most carefully adjusted the backlash and when recognized I get around 800ms to 1300ms. I am sure I do not have binding, I turned both axis manually several times. I also tried a second cable via the handcontroller in pc direct mode. Overall I tried phd2 on my raspberry pi as well as in win10 and mac mojave. Goto and long (2,5-5s) phd2 manual guide pulses work usually.
While the star cross test today all commands could be completed. PHD2 commanded west and east movement perfectly as well as the north commands, but when the south movement started I got the debug log of indi redurned:
[2021-03-16T18:04:27.910 CET DEBG ][ org.kde.kstars.indi] - EQMod Mount : "[DEBUG] Timed guide South 1000 ms at rate 13.537 "
[2021-03-16T18:04:27.911 CET DEBG ][ org.kde.kstars.indi] - EQMod Mount : "[DEBUG] StartDETracking() : trackspeed = -13.537 arcsecs/s, computed rate = -0.9 "
[2021-03-16T18:04:27.911 CET DEBG ][ org.kde.kstars.indi] - EQMod Mount : "[DEBUG] SetDERate() : rate = -0.9 "
[2021-03-16T18:04:27.912 CET INFO ][ org.kde.kstars.indi] - EQMod Mount : "[WARNING] Warning: Invalid parameter -> Can not change rate while motor is running (direction differs). "
Guiding speed is set to 0.9x on both axis in the driver. I know PHD2 cannot affect the settings usually.
As all three problems affect south movement in combination with phd2 and today I seen that error I wanted to contact you.
Example for good calibration but bad backlash measurement:
Two nights ago it was a bit windy but right after a perfect calibration I could not complete the backlash measurement:
<image001.gif>
<image002.gif>
Example for good backlash measurment, same setup and guide speeds:
<image003.gif>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Open PHD Guiding" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/open-phd-guiding/fPsnu8o15cA/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to open-phd-guidi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/D69638EB2DA344FABA0B78C56FC0E4AD%40HomeDesktop.
Thanks for reporting back Sebastian. It pretty much had to be something like this, the interfaces used by PHD2 don’t expose that level of detail for what the driver is actually doing with the mount firmware.
Cheers,
Bruce
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/99AD7BC8-B0E9-4389-9020-81EEEB910251%40gmx.de.