Hi Tommy. I think the problem is with your guide scope setup and you’re getting differential flexure. You can read about that in an appendix of this document:
https://openphdguiding.org/tutorial-analyzing-phd2-guiding-results/
Your guiding is as good as it was before and you should be getting reasonably round stars – and they shouldn’t become worse with longer exposure times. There’s a simple test described in the above document that will confirm differential flexure.
The guide scope arrangement you have now is not up to the job of imaging at the longer focal length. It probably employs a wimpy, stalk-mounted finder scope with endless places that will allow unwanted movement relative to the main scope. You can move to an OAG arrangement or you can try to substantially improve the guide scope arrangement. That would have to include much more rigid mounting arrangements without Delrin-tipped thumb-screws and preferably a longer focal length to reduce the coarseness of your current image scale (which is 6.5 arc-sec/px). Keep in mind that your guide camera will “see” movements of 4 microns, less than 10% of the thickness of a human hair.
Hope you can get this resolved easily,
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open PHD Guiding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-phd-guidi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/f5abf222-dd7f-40d1-9ea8-c5c063fa94e9n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/001401d72e27%24bd1bb1b0%2437531510%24%40earthlink.net.
Your Dec guiding performance is fine, it’s uniformly better than RA. I didn’t see any evidence of backlash but have you used the Guiding Assistant to measure it? Personally, I would go looking for problems when there’s no evidence for them. J
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/CAMxDc5vci1Zipq2ZHCS-q6pkaqi1t7Od%3DeihF9OET10CvE_OQw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/003001d72e52%2418f27da0%244ad778e0%24%40earthlink.net.
The alignment of the guide scope and main scope is largely irrelevant, it’s not your problem. Your problem is with the cheesy guide scope/guide camera assembly. J if you don’t believe me, work through the simple procedure in the log analysis document I pointed to.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/CAMxDc5vjZqwaXcLED2Eq25A2OkN9g%2ByLf8vvYOEMM2vJ2TuteQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/004701d72e57%24f01b9190%24d052b4b0%24%40earthlink.net.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/004701d72e57%24f01b9190%24d052b4b0%24%40earthlink.net.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/CAKfhV05PzRYuVx500Fa%3D8O7k0XTqBMBo9MiyE5K-gF7FFv1PmA%40mail.gmail.com.