It can’t currently be disabled – this is the first I’ve heard of anyone trying to put this adjustment down at the firmware level. Can this “feature” be disabled in the servo controller? Subject to UI real estate and complexity issues, we could provide a way to disable declination compensation. In the meantime, these are the options that come to mind:
1) If you’re using the default hysteresis algorithm for RA guiding, you could adjust the aggressiveness parameter yourself by a factor of cos(dec). That will effectively cancel out the adjustment PHD2 makes (there’s no great precision required here) OR
2) Guide using the ST-4 and “on camera” options in PHD2 and don’t specify an “Aux Mount” connection. At that point, PHD2 won’t know where the scope is pointing and won’t make any adjustments at all – including meridian flips. So when you do a meridian flip, you’d have to manually flip the calibration data (‘Tools/Modify Calibration/Flip…’) OR
3) Before you start guiding on the target, use ‘Tools/Modify Calibration/Enter calibration data’ and manually edit the bottom field in that form – the declination field. Unfortunately, that’s in units of radians so you’d enter your target declination in radians (=declination * 3.14/180) OR
4) Re-calibrate when you make a significant change in Dec pointing position
I realize none of these are terribly attractive but they’re all I can think of right now. Personally, I’d use option 1 unless I was imaging between about 40 and 60 degrees declination. Also, PHD2 doesn’t apply any compensation when the pointing dec is above 60 degrees, so you wouldn’t have to do anything in that part of the sky. I’ll add this to our list of new-feature requests.
Good luck.
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Open PHD Guiding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to open-phd-guidi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Ok. I do have one correction to what I said earlier, I didn’t look closely enough at the code. PHD2 *does* do declination above Dec=60 degrees; it only skips the compensation if the *original calibration* was done at Dec > 60 degrees. You can track the new feature request here: https://code.google.com/p/open-phd-guiding/issues/detail?id=435&thanks=435&ts=1432320629
Just IMHO, embedding these things at the firmware level is not a good idea unless there are ways to disable them. For example, I think I saw in the SiTech manual that they also do automatic adjustments for atmospheric refraction, something that is also better done at an application level. You might want to ask the SiTech people to give you some control over this stuff. Or at least you can be aware of it, because it could easily bite you down the road…
No, I wouldn’t do a calibration above 60 degrees, that will make your situation worse because the computed RA rate will be too low. If you’re going to let the mount controller do dec-compensation, you need to have PHD2 calibrate near the celestial equator. Just another reason why this isn’t a good approach – the SiTech can’t know where the application has done the guider calibration. <g>
Have fun.
Bruce
From:
bw_msgboard [mailto:bw_m...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:04 PM
To: 'steve....@gmail.com';
'open-phd...@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: Turn Off Declination
Dependent Guiding
Ok. I do have one correction to what I said earlier, I didn’t look closely enough at the code. PHD2 *does* do declination above Dec=60 degrees; it only skips the compensation if the *original calibration* was done at Dec > 60 degrees. You can track the new feature request here: https://code.google.com/p/open-phd-guiding/issues/detail?id=435&thanks=435&ts=1432320629
Just IMHO, embedding these things at the firmware level is not a good idea unless there are ways to disable them. For example, I think I saw in the SiTech manual that they also do automatic adjustments for atmospheric refraction, something that is also better done at an application level. You might want to ask the SiTech people to give you some control over this stuff. Or at least you can be aware of it, because it could easily bite you down the road…
Bruce
From: open-phd...@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-phd...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of steve....@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:19
PM
To:
open-phd...@googlegroups.com
Cc: steve....@gmail.com;
bw_m...@earthlink.net