I know this forum is mostly dealing with issues and problems. But I thought I’d share a good news story of how well PHD2 is performing on my (upgraded) system. PHD2 is a brilliant program and mostly “simply works”. Here’s another success case you mostly don’t hear, because we’re too busy out using PHD2 for imaging …
My system is a Celestron EdgeHD 800 w/ 0.7x reducer (only 105 mm back-focus to play with), ZWO 294MC pro camera, ZWO 120MM (bin 2x2) on OAG and AVX mount. Recently, “tuned” the AVX to reduce backlash. After that, using a better algorithm in PHD2 (Periodic PEC) and doing PEC training in CPWI, RA tracking was then about 1” RMS. Now I have upgraded to a Starlight Xpress Active Optic (AO) plus compact filter wheel and OAG (overall optical length just 80 mm) and have seen my best tracking ever at 0.47" RMS total. Not bad on an AVX! Haven't fully explored short exposures (ZWO 120MM bin 2x2) but get good tracking results at 0.5s so far.
And the best part was how painless it was to integrate and calibrate all this using PHD2. After some judicious choices (bin OAG camera 2x2, PHD search region 40 pixels, AO travel range tweaked back to 40, AO bump percentage back to 75%, dithering trigged by SharpCap) and calibrating twice (PHD2 does AO first, then mount) it simply works brilliantly. You’d think I’d have problems with the relative move directions between AO, mount and camera axes. But PHD handles all that. However, for some reason, it always seems to need two forced calibrations to juggle all that into place.
Very happy with how PHD2 performs. Well done team!
Cheers, Chris.
![]()
