
I completely agree with Andy's analysis and I'll just add a few points. I can see the same behavior in your earlier log, the difference being that the size of the displacements is not as large (2 arc-sec instead of 5 arc-sec). As with most of these things, there are two things to consider: 1) what is causing the mount to suddenly move north, and 2) how is the mount behaving during the recovery cycle. The first question is the more important one IMO and to be clear, it is not a guiding problem. Something is causing the mount to move this way and since it starts with Dec and we know the Dec motor is not running continuously, it is likely something external to the mount drive system. My first guess is that you might have a cable that's binding such that it tugs on the scope, holds against the resultant guide corrections, then lets go. I saw your posts on the AP forum so I know you've done through-the-mount cabling and have everything fastened down tight. Well, maybe too tight. Any single cable that's attached to something on the scope (i.e. moves with the scope) must be able to move without interference from a stationary surface or any other adjacent cable. Since you're guiding at 1 a-s/px, it doesn't take much to create guide star displacements. That's the place I'd start looking. This sort of thing could also explain why there is always a smaller-magnitude shift in RA shortly after the Dec displacement begins.
The second part of the question, how the mount responds, could involve questions of gear mesh and backlash in the mount. You can measure the backlash directly using the Guiding Assistant. Since your mount has been shipped multiple times, it wouldn't be surprising if the Dec mesh needs to be adjusted. But I would first want to eliminate the large displacements.
If you can't identify a cable problem or something else that is deflecting the mount, you'll probably need to invest some time to narrow things down. Here's one approach:
1. Move to the same part of the sky where you had the problem before -same hour angle and Dec. Run a guiding session to see if the problem recurs. This might take as long as 30 minutes based on what happened before.
2. Assuming you can duplicate the problem, disable Dec guiding (Dec guide mode = none) and repeat the guiding run. If it recurs, you can be entirely sure that Dec guiding has nothing to do with it.
3. To be even more thorough, disable all guide output from PHD2 and just watch what the mount does. How long you can run this way will depend on the size of the tracking region (make it huge), your polar alignment, and how much periodic error you have in RA.
4. Consider routing some duplicate cables outside the mount just for the purpose of testing. I don't have any experience with in-mount cabling, so I don't know how hard this would be. You would only need to have duplicate cables that are attached to devices that are moving around with the scope. Cables going into the CP3 control box are presumably entirely stationary.
Once you have clearly demonstrated you don't have a guiding problem but still can't identify the source, you can probably get some help from AP. And you can always come back to us with additional data as you collect it.
Good luck,
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Open PHD Guiding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to open-phd-guidi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Backlash comp may improve how the mount responds to a large excursion but it isn't going to eliminate the source of the problem. I guess I'm skeptical that you've eliminated the problem in Dec. I've always used 1X sidereal for the guide rate which is what AP recommends. Your guide pulses are large enough that this shouldn't be a problem. On the few occasions that I've done back-to-back tests on my mount with 0.5x and 1x guide rates, I've never seen a statistically meaningful difference. Also, when you're looking at "spikes", you need to pay attention to their size and the extent to which they actually interfere with your imaging results. I realize you have all your cables secured, but that still leaves open the possibility of binding or rubbing in the cable bundle.
Bruce
From:
open-phd...@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-phd...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Joel Short
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 8:20
PM
To: Open PHD Guiding
Cc: andy.g...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [open-phd-guiding]
I'm getting spikes in DEC
Hi Bruce,
--
It looks to me like almost all of these large excursions are closely associated with a dither operation. Why don't you try dithering only in RA to see if the behavior changes. The LogViewer does exclude dither regions, you can see the gray background around them. But sometimes I think there can be slight timing issues such that the start of the dither might get included. I generally look closely at the graph myself if I'm trying to look at peak excursions.
Bruce
From: open-phd...@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-phd...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Joel Short
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016
5:49 AM
To: Open PHD Guiding
--
Yes, I'd say you've nailed the problem. I don't see even a hint of the Dec-then-RA excursions from before, so your adjustment of the pre-load appears to have handled that very neatly. Congratulations! If I was in your shoes, I'd spend the day with a big smile on my face, seriously. <g> The guiding now looks excellent with only a very few minor excursions in RA that probably have no significance. Great work!
Looking back on the dialog, I think we were on the right track by thinking something was binding and not allowing the mount to move freely. But it was internal to the mount, not an external condition.
Have fun imaging,
Bruce
From: open-phd...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:open-phd...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Joel Short
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016
7:00 AM
To: Open PHD Guiding
Subject: [open-phd-guiding] Re:
I'm getting spikes in DEC
Bruce and Andy,
I am happy to report that after tweaking some things on the mount yesterday the guiding last night was nearly perfect and I did not observe large spikes or overcorrections. It's such a huge change from the previous two nights and I didn't lose one sub all night last night. Would you mind taking a quick look at my guide log from last night and note anything inconsistent or odd that you see? To my untrained eyes the guiding appears very good but I trust your knowledge better than mine.
Yes, spontaneous sudden excursions, mostly in Dec, having nothing to do with PHD2. This particular example is instructive:

At the point the guide star started the big Dec excursion, nothing at all was happening on the Dec axis - the Dec motor wasn't even running. Suggests to me it's something external to the mount and the drive system.
Bruce
From:
open-phd...@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-phd...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Joel Short
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2016 11:16
AM
To: Open PHD Guiding
Subject: [open-phd-guiding] Re:
I'm getting spikes in DEC
OK fellas, I've had two incredibly clear nights and 99% of the random guiding spikes have disappeared. I'm tickled pink with it. However, on each of the last two nights I have had 4 spiking events which have ruined 2hrs of photos each night (only 4 images though - 30min subs). On both nights I got 2 really wild swings in RA (like 40") and 1-2 lesser swings in DEC. Just to double check with you, that would clearly indicate something physical in the mount, right? Or somthing like a cable getting pulled and suddenly released? If I could find the source of these very few spikes I would throw a party.
Here's the logs from the last two nights.
joel