Hi Bruce,
"
I think you're putting the system into a weird state and I don't know
how the mount driver will respond. Pulse-guiding while pointing at the
north celestial pole is a weird state. Why are you so resistant to
slewing the scope away from that area as we've suggested?"
I tried both. I first tried pointing at the North celestial pole because, well when you're a noob like me, setting up the mount step by step ultimately results in the mount pointing towards Polaris (artificially, since I haven't had a single clear night since I got the mount). Following your suggestion however, I slewed at the celestial equator and tested PHD2 manual guiding tool, but got the same results as before (North and South commands work, East and West don't).
The mount is brand new (Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro), got it at the end of March and have not had a single clear or partially clear night to put it to real world test, so we set it up in the living room.
This is our first ever mount and there's a lot to take in and to try to make sense of, but I took it in stride and solved issues one at a time. Everything appeared fine right up until I watched some videos and read about how I should not be using ST-4 for guiding and instead should be pulse guiding using the mount to PC USB connection.
My logic was simply that if I hear the motors and see the mount move when using PHD2 Manual Guiding with ST-4, I should also expect the same results with pulse guiding through the USB connection.
Perhaps that is a wrong assumption but I'm hard pressed to find any information clearly telling me otherwise. The thing is, I have years ahead of me to learn everything there is to learn about
astrophotography but
I only have a short window to determine whether or not the mount is defective.
The shop I bought the mount from suggested that perhaps the issue I'm having could be firmware related and could potentially be bypassed by using a special serial-USB cable from Pegasus Astro plugged into the hand control port on the mount and into the PC. I tried this also but the results are the same.
There is a lot I have yet to grasp about all of this. Truth be told I don't yet understand why pulse guiding is better than ST-4, other than one less cable to manage and that the guiding software knows when the scope is East or West (or something along those lines). I think that I understand that EQMOD assumes that the mount is polar aligned when you launch it and that is why it shows a declination of 90, but I could be wrong there too. I also don't understand if tracking needs to be on or off in EQMOD when using PHD2 Manual Guiding. With GS Server (which I also tried) you cannot use PHD2 Manual Guiding unless tracking is on. If doing so, PHD2 produces a clear error message about pulse guiding failure.
On the bright side, at least now I know that my PHD2 debug log seems normal. At the end of the day, if PHD2 Manual Guiding tool is not a good way to quickly tell if the mount is properly responding to pulse commands, I'll try something else.
Thank you for
exerciser tool. I'll give that a try.