Markus Elfring
unread,May 29, 2020, 6:09:13 AM5/29/20Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Qiushi Wu, linux...@vger.kernel.org, open-...@googlegroups.com, kernel-...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, Chris Leech, James E. J. Bottomley, Kangjie Lu, Lee Duncan, Martin K. Petersen
> kobject_init_and_add() should be handled when it return an error,
> because kobject_init_and_add() takes reference even when it fails.
I find this wording approach improvable.
> Previous commit "b8eb718348b8" fixed a similar problem.
I suggest to omit this information from the commit message.
> Thus replace calling kfree() by calling kobject_put().
How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
Thus replace a call of the function “kfree” by “kobject_put”
because of using kernel objects in the proper way.
Please take another look also at the message field “To”.
Which recipients should be specified there first?
Regards,
Markus