multipathd: sdc: readsector0 checker reports path is down

2,050 views
Skip to first unread message

Ray Van Dolson

unread,
Jan 8, 2009, 2:31:38 PM1/8/09
to dm-d...@redhat.com, open-...@googlegroups.com
I'm still getting the hang of iSCSI and multipath, so bear with me if
this is a FAQ that I've missed...

I have a host attaching to an MD3000i via iSCSI/dm-multipath that is
working but showing a lot of the following errors in syslog:

multipathd: sdc: readsector0 checker reports path is down

My initial impression is that sdc is likely the "passive" path (for
failover) whereas sdd is my active path:

# multipath -ll
sdc: checker msg is "readsector0 checker reports path is down"
mpath2 (36001ec9000f338370000000000000000) dm-2 DELL,Universal Xport
[size=20M][features=0][hwhandler=0]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=0][enabled]
\_ 4:0:0:31 sdf 8:80 [active][ready]
mpath1 (36001ec9000f337dd0000000000000000) dm-1 DELL,Universal Xport
[size=20M][features=0][hwhandler=0]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=0][enabled]
\_ 3:0:0:31 sde 8:64 [active][ready]
mpath0 (36001ec9000f337dd0000065b491854a4) dm-0 DELL,MD3000i
[size=150G][features=0][hwhandler=1 rdac]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=3][active]
\_ 3:0:0:0 sdd 8:48 [active][ready]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=0][enabled]
\_ 4:0:0:0 sdc 8:32 [failed][faulty]

# iscsiadm -m discovery -t sendtargets -p 192.168.132.101:3260
0.0.0.0:3260,1 iqn.1984-05.com.dell:powervault.6001ec9000f337dd0000000048bdc862
0.0.0.0:3260,2 iqn.1984-05.com.dell:powervault.6001ec9000f337dd0000000048bdc862
192.168.132.101:3260,1 iqn.1984-05.com.dell:powervault.6001ec9000f337dd0000000048bdc862
192.168.132.102:3260,2 iqn.1984-05.com.dell:powervault.6001ec9000f337dd0000000048bdc862

# iscsiadm -m session -P 1
Target: iqn.1984-05.com.dell:powervault.6001ec9000f337dd0000000048bdc862
Current Portal: 192.168.132.101:3260,1
Persistent Portal: 192.168.132.101:3260,1
**********
Interface:
**********
Iface Name: default
Iface Transport: tcp
Iface Initiatorname: iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:2738e0d3bd21
Iface IPaddress: 192.168.132.202
Iface HWaddress: default
Iface Netdev: default
SID: 1
iSCSI Connection State: LOGGED IN
iSCSI Session State: Unknown
Internal iscsid Session State: NO CHANGE
Current Portal: 192.168.132.102:3260,2
Persistent Portal: 192.168.132.102:3260,2
**********
Interface:
**********
Iface Name: default
Iface Transport: tcp
Iface Initiatorname: iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:2738e0d3bd21
Iface IPaddress: 192.168.132.202
Iface HWaddress: default
Iface Netdev: default
SID: 2
iSCSI Connection State: LOGGED IN
iSCSI Session State: Unknown
Internal iscsid Session State: NO CHANGE

sde and sdf are the silly 20MB partition that the MD3000 creates and
I'm not using either.

My ultimate goal is to not have so many of the path is down errors
showing up in my syslog file (hundreds and hundreds of them). I'm not
sure if their presence is normal (indicative of a passive path) or
indicative of a problem.

Also, I'm not clear as to how I should identify which target
corresponds with which drive (sdc or sdd).

Any thoughts? I don't have direct access to the MD3000i
unfortunately... this is from a CentOS 5.2 system btw.

Ray

Chandra Seetharaman

unread,
Jan 8, 2009, 2:58:52 PM1/8/09
to open-...@googlegroups.com, dm-d...@redhat.com

On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:31 -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> I'm still getting the hang of iSCSI and multipath, so bear with me if
> this is a FAQ that I've missed...
>
> I have a host attaching to an MD3000i via iSCSI/dm-multipath that is
> working but showing a lot of the following errors in syslog:
>
> multipathd: sdc: readsector0 checker reports path is down
you should be using the rdac path checker. In addition to that you
should be using rdac hardware handler and tpc priority checker.

If you have and entry for your MD3000i in /etc/multipath.conf, replace
it with this. If not add this
-------------------
devices {
device {
vendor "DELL"
product "MD3000i"
hardware_handler "1 rdac"
path_checker rdac
failback immediate
path_grouping_policy group_by_prio
no_path_retry queue
prio_callout "/sbin/mpath_prio_tpc /dev/%n"
}
}
---------------------

After this change you have to do:
- multipath -F
- service multipathd restart

Let me know how it goes.
>
> My initial impression is that sdc is likely the "passive" path (for
> failover) whereas sdd is my active path:

yes.

Konrad Rzeszutek

unread,
Jan 8, 2009, 2:56:43 PM1/8/09
to device-mapper development, open-...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:31:38AM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> I'm still getting the hang of iSCSI and multipath, so bear with me if
> this is a FAQ that I've missed...
>
> I have a host attaching to an MD3000i via iSCSI/dm-multipath that is
> working but showing a lot of the following errors in syslog:
>
> multipathd: sdc: readsector0 checker reports path is down

You are using the wrong path checker, wrong path priority program,
and no hardware path checker :-(

Here is what you need in your multipath.conf file:

#
# DELL :D3000i :: Active-Passive RDAC
# Note: The same as the IBM DS3300
#

device {
vendor "DELL"
product "MD3000i"

product_blacklist "Universal Xport"
features "1 queue_if_no_path"
path_grouping_policy group_by_prio


hardware_handler "1 rdac"
path_checker rdac

prio "rdac"
failback immediate
}


Thought you might need to replace the 'prio "rdac"' with
'prio_callout "/sbin/mpath_prio_rdac" as I think RHEL5/CentOS5 uses
the old calling convention.

This should get rid of your down errors and show your passive/active path
properly.

Ray Van Dolson

unread,
Jan 8, 2009, 3:10:09 PM1/8/09
to open-...@googlegroups.com, dm-d...@redhat.com

This appears to have done the trick. So, I guess the default path
checker is readsector0 and rdac is another method -- I imagine it
directly talks to my MD3000i to determine path status?

> >
> > My initial impression is that sdc is likely the "passive" path (for
> > failover) whereas sdd is my active path:
>
> yes.

Thanks much!

Ray

Ray Van Dolson

unread,
Jan 8, 2009, 3:16:50 PM1/8/09
to open-...@googlegroups.com, device-mapper development

Thanks. I had to remove the features line -- got an Unrecognised
feature request error otherwise.

Thanks again,
Ray

Chandra Seetharaman

unread,
Jan 8, 2009, 3:48:36 PM1/8/09
to device-mapper development, open-...@googlegroups.com

Yes, it sends a C9 inquiry to the storage controller and determines the
state.


>
> > >
> > > My initial impression is that sdc is likely the "passive" path (for
> > > failover) whereas sdd is my active path:
> >
> > yes.
>
> Thanks much!
>
> Ray
>

> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-d...@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages