Membership of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) requires governments to submit Self-Assessment Reports assessing the government's performance in living up to its commitments in its OGP National Action Plan 2014-2016 (NAP). The first (Midterm) report has now been drafted and a 3-week consultation process is being initiated on the report.
Anyone wishing to submit their views on the Report may do so by forwarding them to me at Kieran...@per.gov.ie by close of business on Monday 12th October 2015. All submissions will be considered, may be published on the Department’s website and will be subject to Freedom of Information legislation.
Kieran Sheedy
Government Reform Unit
Department of Public Expenditure and Reform
7-9 Merrion Row
Dublin 2.
D02 V223

Open
Knowledge Ambassador / Open Knowledge Ireland, Founder
https://openknowledge.ie/ | @OKFirl | Google+

'To open up all essential public interest information and see it used to create insight that drives change.'
Flora
I’m not fully sure what you mean by “summaries, reports, pilot results” etc. but the Appendix document to the Self Assessment report (copied) sets out in detail work undertaken etc. in respect of each of the actions. Each template also includes the contact details of the public sector individuals seeking to advance them so if you wished to get further detail you may wish to contact the person directly?
Kieran Sheedy
Government Reform Unit
Department of Public Expenditure and Reform
7-9 Merrion Row
Dublin 2.
D02 V223
Flora
The format and detail of the Self-Assessment Report (SAR) and the templates follows the guidance note of OGP International – see attached pdf. While SAR reports by other countries on the opengov partnership website don’t include Templates, we have been advised by OGP International that they must be completed from now on. I have attached for your information the ogp international procedures manual. You will see that the independent reviewer’s assessments of our actions are coded and input to a central system and in that context providing less detail than we have done would make the work of the reviewer more difficult. In view of the above, your suggestion that the SAR has been produced as we have done to “avoid getting feedback from people or being held accountable” is not correct.
The templates in appendix 1 were completed by those responsible for the individual actions and seek to address in as comprehensive a way as possible where things are at in relation to each one. While those responsible for individual actions hadn’t added weblinks to the templates to assist in finding documentation and reports etc. in all cases, on reflection I think would be helpful and we will do it centrally here over the next day or so. When done, I will replace the existing version of Appendix 1 on the websites with the revised version and let you know.
<IRM Procedures Manual v 2.0 PUBLIC_0.docx>
<OGP_self_assessment_cal FINAL (1).pdf>
Dear Flora
I am sorry to note that you are finding it difficult to understand the self-assessment report. If you specifically identify the areas in the report that you cannot understand, we will try to clarify them for you.
I note in your email below that you state that you are comparing the report with what had originally been requested. Perhaps you don’t recall that the joint working group went through, over many weeks, a consideration process of the many recommendations originally sought in the earlier civil society report. The agreed National Action Plan endorsed by the Government and civil society superceded that report and is the Plan we are reporting on therefore.
Best regards
Evelyn
Government Reform Unit
6045311