Group: http://groups.google.com/group/open-data-ottawa--oc-tranpo-gps-api/topics
- Answers in council to questions [3 Updates]
Don Kelly <kar...@gmail.com> Mar 20 02:46PM -0400 ^
(http://www.ottawa.ca/calendar/ottawa/citycouncil/tc/2011/02-16/TTC%20Inq%2003-11%20-%20Open%20Data%20City%20(Wilkinson).htm)
In case anyone missed it, that appears to be the "official" answer to
council on the GPS api.
Don/
--
karfai [AT] gmail.com
http://www.strangeware.ca
http://blog.strangeware.ca
John Bain <john...@gmail.com> Mar 20 11:45PM -0400 ^
Reading that annoys me!
To add insult to injury I was at the Queensway station waiting for my bus
and i noticed that the OC transpo mobi site and the schedule board at the
stop showed 2 different times for the same bus that ended up being late
anyways ...
Don Kelly <kar...@gmail.com> Mar 21 12:27AM -0400 ^
One part which caught my eye, on re-reading, was:
"As well, there are several issues related to the open data model,
such as enabling third parties to deliver OC Transpo real-time bus
arrival information, which if it were to continue, could create false
expectations and negative results for our customers. These third
parties are not delivering real-time data but a forecast based on the
data they have, which may or may not be consistent with what is
happening in actual operations. Control of real-time data by the
transit authority is consistent with what other transit authorities
throughout North America are doing, such as the Chicago Transit
Authority."
What's meant by "forecast"? Was the feed that the node.js site was
consuming only a forecast? Or, is he trying to spin the conversation
to suggest that the "real time" apps are only working predictively
from the static schedule? AFAICT, the feed we were consuming was not a
forecast but the actual data out of the stop announcement system (or a
sibling of that system).
Anyone know the answer?
Don/
--
karfai [AT] gmail.com
http://www.strangeware.ca
http://blog.strangeware.ca