Hey,
Based on our conversation a few weeks back I've suggested a tweak the the current five stars, trying to make number 2 less tech specific. So - rather than
* * Provide good meta-data and put data in context
I've suggested rewriting this to just:
* * Put the data in context
With the blurb:
Do you provide clear information to describe that data you provide, including information about frequency of updates, data formats and data quality? Do you include qualitative information alongside datasets such as details of how the data was created, or manuals for working with the data? Do you link from data catalogue pages to analysis of the data that your organisation, or third-parties, have already carried out with it, or to third-party tools for working with the data?
Will try and get a web page up for all this in the next few days, and then get that position paper written.
Jag - would be great to hear about how discussions in Sheffield went...
All the best
Tim
--
http://www.timdavies.org.uk07834 856 303.
@timdavies
Co-director of Practical Participation:
http://www.practicalparticipation.co.uk--------------------------
Practical Participation Ltd is a registered company in England and Wales - #5381958.