ODD + Atom

[Marcus Povey]

It has been suggested by a number of people that we explore wrapping
ODD up in Atom.

This is something I think it would be worth exploring. While I still
feel that we should maintain the existing schema (perhaps as ODD-
Simple), I think that an Atom version could be very powerful (letting
people use existing parsers etc).

What are people's thoughts on this?

Marcus

[marc canter]

yes - it's essential that OpenDD is seen as something that is simple and can
be adapted to Atom, RSS, microformats and get utilized by mechanisms such as
OpenID2's attribute exchange.

Yes - go.

[Danny Ayers]

2008/5/8 Marcus Povey <mar...@dushka.co.uk>:

 
What might you want to change?
Give it a namespace and a media type you're basically done :-)

Cheers,
Danny.

--
http://dannyayers.com
~
http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/this_weeks_semantic_web/

[Danny Ayers]

2008/5/8 marc canter <ma...@broadbandmechanics.com>:

yes - it's essential that OpenDD is seen as something that is simple and can
be adapted to Atom, RSS, microformats and get utilized by mechanisms such as
OpenID2's attribute exchange.

Yes - go.

 
As usual, I don't disagree Mr.Canter...

For it to work with microformats & OpenID AX you'll probably need to define a data model aside from the current syntax - one way would be via RDF.
(I'm just saying, that's all... :-)

Cheers,
Danny.

[marc canter]

oh really - now that’s a surprising solution - just kidding!

 

obviously there will need to be multiple flavors of OpenDD for it to work

 

---

[Chris Messina]

Since I had championed this idea, I'll just throw in a +1.

I also think that using hAtom + microformats will also work well for existing lifestreaming sites.

Oh, and any thoughts on http://oembed.com?

Chris

--
Chris Messina
Citizen-Participant &
Open Source Advocate-at-Large
factoryjoe.com # citizenagency.com # diso-project.org
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private

[low...@gmail.com]

I take a look to emebed and I liked their approach.

It is a easy way to interchange some time of contents between sites.

I'm not sure how it could be related inside the odd spec, but sure
will be a desirable for a social network platform. In the case of Elgg
(classic or 1.0 it could be added how a plugin, I think.)

[Marcus Povey]

It looks like a fairly trivial format to implement, so I see no reason
not to provide this view especially if there are others using it....
We want to make Elgg 1 as interoperable as possible ;)

Something for the list anyway ;)

Marcus

On 9 May, 09:13, "Chris Messina" <chris.mess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since I had championed this idea, I'll just throw in a +1.
> I also think that using hAtom + microformats will also work well for
> existing lifestreaming sites.
>

> Oh, and any thoughts onhttp://oembed.com?
>
> Chris
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:57 AM, marc canter <m...@broadbandmechanics.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
> >  oh really - now that's a surprising solution - just kidding!
>
> > obviously there will need to be multiple flavors of OpenDD for it to work
>

> >  ------------------------------
>
> > *From:* open-data-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> > open-data-...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Danny Ayers
> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:24 AM
> > *To:* open-data-...@googlegroups.com
> > *Subject:* Re: ODD + Atom
>
> > 2008/5/8 marc canter <m...@broadbandmechanics.com>:

[Marcus Povey]

Folks,

Just a quick note to say that I have put an early draft of OpenDD-over-
Atom up on the website:

http://www.opendd.net/resources/ODD_Over_Atom_V0.1(draft).pdf

and blogged about it here:

http://www.marcus-povey.co.uk/2008/05/20/opendd-over-atom/

Marcus