I did this back in 2010 Pete, sent a personal email to 3 people around the world. They were all academics practising in universities. Typical to the profession, their responses were favourable but their actions disappointing. I've found that feedback and review has worked better with each iteration of the 'by publication' approach. I get a first draft somewhere near ready, then solicit review from a range of people, including those I cite in the paper. I document their remarks on the wiki talk page, and address their concers in the following draft.
I'm reckoning this approach is equivalent to a traditional supervisor role, and I'm going that over time, people who offer me these reviews will start to get a broader overview of my thesis, and be able to comment on that too.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open and Networked PhDs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-and-networke...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-and-networked-phds+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
Hello Yves. I followed up with Charles Darwin University, which I believe to be the most flexible in Australia. All we need is in place there, in what they call a "PhD by pre publication" meaning they will accept and assess work done before enrolling. But the catch is, you must find a supervisor at CDU. This is were I faltered.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open and Networked PhDs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-and-networke...@googlegroups.com.
The Candidacy process we have been testing is an excellent way for formal and informal phd wanna-bees I reckon. Universities should be looking to this model. I know it is too much to ask that they simply use what we've created. Instead, they will recreate it, and lose much of the spirit.
--