You need to review one of my practice votes, but...
Contest to fill seats on a committee - those ranked 1 & 2 to full 3 year terms and 3rd ranked for a 1 year fill-in.
From the "mtg#2" Ballot file 4 candidates set up in this order:
"Rev. Deacon Rollo Royce"
"Rev. Mary Fairlane"
"Rev. Deborah DeSoto"
"Very Reverend Terrence Hornswaggle"
from the "mtg#2" Results file:
1st Round - Candidates Rev. Deborah DeSoto and Very Reverend Terrence Hornswaggle have reached the threshold and are elected. (Candidate order)
2nd Round - Candidate Rev. Mary Fairlane has reached the threshold and is elected.
Winners are Rev. Mary Fairlane, Rev. Deborah DeSoto, and Very Reverend Terrence Hornswaggle. (Candidate order)
All fine and good, but I need to know that Hornswaggle is ranked 1st because he received the most votes and is elected to a full term seat, then DeSoto who is ranked 2nd is also elected to a full term seat, and lastly Fairlane who is ranked 3rd is elected to the 1 year fill-in seat. The Hare method software we have been using does just that.