Moral, ethical, and practical issues about AI

[John F Sowa]

The recent encyclical by Pope Leo raises ethical, moral, and practial questions about AI that affect every aspect of society.  Following are some excerpts from a recent article that discusses the issues:

For the complete artiicle:  www.ncronline.org/opinion/guest-voices/magnifica-humanitas-pope-leo-proposes-synodality-whole-world 

 

John

____________

Public debates about artificial intelligence tend to revolve around familiar binaries: regulation or innovation, optimism or alarm, acceleration or restraint. Magnifica Humanitas reframes the debate. The real challenge is not whether humanity adopts powerful technologies, but whether societies can govern them without sacrificing human dignity, pluralism and democratic responsibility.  

 

Engineers understand systems but not always their social consequences. Politicians regulate technologies they often struggle to comprehend. Economists measure efficiency while overlooking dignity and social cohesion. Educators witness how digital culture reshapes attention and imagination but cannot redesign technological infrastructures. Theologians defend moral anthropology yet cannot resolve technical governance questions. . .. 

Artificial intelligence intensifies this temptation dramatically. A small number of institutions increasingly mediate how people communicate, work, remember, consume information and even form political judgment. Leo observes that technological development is increasingly shaped by "private, often transnational, parties" possessing resources greater than many governments. This concentration of power begins to resemble Babel: one language, one logic, one direction.  The technocratic temptation promises efficiency but risks marginalizing the plurality that sustains democratic life. . . .

Artificial intelligence, then, cannot remain the concern of engineers, regulators or corporate executives alone. It is also a question for schools, families, religious communities, universities and democratic institutions. Education becomes especially important. If digital technologies increasingly shape attention, truth and moral imagination, schools cannot limit themselves to technical training. They must cultivate discernment. . . .

That vision feels increasingly urgent in democratic societies fractured by mistrust, polarization and algorithmic fragmentation. AI does not simply distribute information; it shapes memory, attention and public discourse itself. The challenge is no longer misinformation alone but the erosion of a shared moral horizon.

Technocracy cannot repair this crisis. Faster systems cannot rebuild trust. Better algorithms cannot substitute for civic responsibility. Efficiency cannot create solidarity.