--
All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source license.
For information about the wiki, the license, and how to subscribe or
unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ontolog-forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ontolog-foru...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAMhe4f1faWoWBD0iKqvM2%2BL1xK7KfdyXFy4YfDcqk-BO41OJaw%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi all.
John, thank you for interrelating the multiple semantics and ontology projects in https://jfsowa.com/ikl, a handy resource!
Regarding the article forwarded by Alex, Stamper’s Semiotic ladder would be pertinent:
http://assets.cs.ncl.ac.uk/seminars/101.pdf (and multiple subsequent materials on the subject: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=stampers+semiotic+ladder)
I’ve referred to it in my past work, e.g.:
I believe that the late Stamper’s work is underrepresented, but it would be interesting to hear your thoughts.
Thanks!
Simon
Dr Simon Polovina
Department of Computing, Sheffield Hallam University, UK
Hi Simon,
Nice idea in 101.pdf "...treating the notion of a sign as a primitive concept, we can arrive at much clearer definitions of many of the troublesome concepts in the information systems domain, not least the concept of information, itself."
The question is what other primitive concepts and relations we need to axiomatise Information theory?
Keeping in mind as a benchmark for example Hilbert's axiomatisation of Euclid's Geometry.
The topic raised in the article brought by Gary:
"...to maintain an accurate mental model of other's norms, and thus to avoid social friction, such conflicts must be detected and resolved quickly. Formalizing this process has been the focus of various deontic logics and normative multi-agent systems. We aim to bridge the gap between these two fields here."
is very specific. This is why I am transferring this article to people who are working in both of these fields "various deontic logics and normative multi-agent systems." They use an axiomatic theory approach directly and thoroughly.
For me an interesting situation may be if we have for the same application area from enterprise to science an axiomatic theory and a formal ontology.
This topic may be close to your https://sysaffairs.org/move/move24-cfp MOVEment ⚖️.
Alex
--
All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source license.
For information about the wiki, the license, and how to subscribe or
unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ontolog-forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ontolog-foru...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/DB8PR03MB549759BED56A3513F21AAB97D9AC2%40DB8PR03MB5497.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com.
Hi all.
John, thank you for interrelating the multiple semantics and ontology projects in https://jfsowa.com/ikl, a handy resource!
Regarding the article forwarded by Alex, Stamper’s Semiotic ladder would be pertinent:tp://assets.cs.ncl.ac.uk/seminars/101.pdf (and multiple subsequent materials on the subject: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=stampers+semiotic+ladder)