--
All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source license.
For information about the wiki, the license, and how to subscribe or
unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ontolog-forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ontolog-foru...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/2d285d2aae194b62bd714397679159dd%404b8be8277d6c49f5b598b80103f9d322.
Hi John,
I believe a public apology always deserves a response, especially from a protagonist, me, that raised issues engendering the apology. I thank you for so doing.
Further, while I aspire to Christian virtues and hold grace in the greatest esteem, my assessment is that I have small reservoirs of both grace and patience. Were it otherwise. Again, in the hope I gain a little grace (as if it is some kind of liquid one can decant), I need to thank you for your public comments.
But I also have to be honest to say that your apology is not for
what I raised issues with you in the first place. Your 'warnings'
about LLM and the general sense conveyed that we needed protection
from the evils of a new technology I have mostly found annoying
and presumptuous, not disturbing. I blow issues of this nature off
all the time.
What caused me to comment was for you to take a very useful paper, simply provided, and hijack the thread to present a narrative completely orthogonal to the paper topic of LLMs as an efficiency aid to the development and maintenance of knowledge graphs (FYI, I, too, use KGs and ontologies interchangeably as does the paper). BTW, this is a perfect topic for this forum.
I won't repeat my earlier emails, but the points raised had to do
with off-topic arguments and narratives that had everything to do
with what you wanted to say, not to what the topic (KGs and LLMs)
was at hand. The hijacking of a potentially useful thread with the
repeating of your oft-repeated arguments was what triggered me.
For that, I apologize; I perhaps should have let the irritant
drift off into the wind.
So, thank you for your apology. But I can not be full-hearted on this thanks until there is real communication.
Mike
--
All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source license.
For information about the wiki, the license, and how to subscribe or
unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ontolog-forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ontolog-foru...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/2d285d2aae194b62bd714397679159dd%404b8be8277d6c49f5b598b80103f9d322.
-- __________________________________________ Michael K. Bergman 319.621.5225 http://mkbergman.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mkbergman __________________________________________