Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

[Jon Awbrey]

Cf: Survey of 7Semiotics,7 Semiosis, Sign Relations • 4
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/04/05/survey-of-semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-4/

All,

C.S. Peirce defines “logic” as “formal semiotic”, using “formal” to
distinguish the role of logic as a normative science, over and above
the more descriptive study of signs in the wild and their antics at large.
Understanding logic as Peirce understood it therefore requires a companion
study of semiotics, semiosis, and sign relations.

This is a Survey ( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/surveys/ ) of blog and wiki
resources on the theory of signs, variously known as semeiotic or semiotics,
and the actions referred to as semiosis which transform signs among themselves
in relation to their objects, all as based on C.S. Peirce's concept of triadic
sign relations.

Note. Please follow the above link for the full set of resources.
I'll post just a sample of basics below.

Elements

• Semeiotic ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Semeiotic )

• Sign Relations ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Sign_relation )

Sources

C.S. Peirce • On the Definition of Logic
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/01/c-s-peirce-on-the-definition-of-logic/

C.S. Peirce • Logic as Semiotic
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/04/c-s-peirce-logic-as-semiotic/

C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/03/09/c-s-peirce-objective-logic/

Blog Series

• Semeiotic ( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2008/07/30/semeiotic/ )

Regards,

Jon ( https://mathstodon.xyz/@Inquiry )