How To Get Sketchy For Free

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Torie Crivello

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 1:58:41 AM8/5/24
to ontemilgang
Asketch is a rough drawing usually done as an initial draft in contrast to a finished work. The word sketch suggests imperfection and a lack of refinement. It comes from the Dutch word schets and ultimately from the Italian verb schizzare, an imitative verb meaning "to splash."

Unsurprisingly, the adjective sketchy originally described something relating to or resembling a sketch, as in "a sketchy portrait." But because sketches are by nature rough and ill-defined, sketchy soon came to mean "wanting in completeness, clearness, or substance," as in "a sketchy understanding" or "sketchy details."


What lacks completeness, clearness, or substance is also subject to doubt or challenge, and sketchy went on to develop uses applying to what is questionable or iffy, either for physically obvious qualities or for something less tangible. In sports we see this sense of sketchy applied to a track or surface that is poorly maintained, as in "a sketchy track," and in broader use it is applied to streets and neighborhoods that can also be described as seedy, as in "a sketchy part of town."


The adjective has more recently extended in use to describe someone who creates an impression of unsavoriness, or something that comes from an untrustworthy source or is itself untrustworthy, as in "a sketchy dude" or "a scheme that sounds sketchy."


Second, I would like sketchy to appear automatically. When I answer a card that has an image in the sketchy field, I want it to open automatically instead of having to click on it. Is there a way to make this happen?

image638503 26 KB


For your first question, the learn ahead limit should be set at 15 minutes, which means you only need to wait 10 minutes until the card shows up if your again is set at 25 minutes. You can tweak this as much as you like. You can find this in the preferences section of Anki here below.


Hybrid renders the edges as vector lines. Sketchy edges are created in SketchUp by overlaying .png (raster) images of strokes over the edges in the model. If you want the sketchy edges to be displayed in LayOut you have to leave the rendering to Raster.


For example, if you are looking at the front side of a board with a groove lengthwise on the back and showing in SketchUp as dashed lines because of Back Edges Dashed button is selected, then, when viewed in LayOut as vector rendered, will not show the dashed back edges. They will show if it is raster rendered.


Also, if I put the vector window on top, then no hidden lines show. If I put the raster window on top then I lose the effect of putting nice, clean linework on top for dimensioning, etc. ala Nick Sonder.


One of the things with that last image, though, is that there are now four viewports, all using the same scene. LO will automatically dimension across the viewports so you can use break lines and cut out sections where there are no details.


I need to draw sketchy architectural diagrams to illustrate design concepts as part of my work. We draw our sketches on a wacom pad and deliberately use a trembling hand to create a rough wavy sketchy line which contrasts well with other more finished work. When we use other programmes such as Inskspace or Sketchbook pro we get the desired result. See attached.


I cannot get the same rough effect with either pen, pencil or even the brush tool in Designer - I need that sketchy rough effect. But even with the stabiliser unchecked AFD smooths off the line. The coloured box on the left of the attached example was drawn with Inkscape and the more smooth line on the right was done in AFD


Which Tool are you using? For example, if you're in the Designer Persona it could be the Pencil Tool or the Vector Brush Tool (or perhaps, with more work, the Pen Tool). Although there is some smoothing, I can get lines like the ones you show using either the Pencil Tool or the Vector Brush Tool.


There's no direct equivalent in Designer. The best I can suggest is to use a Pencil Brush for the stroke, tweak the Pressure settings to get some variation in the weight, copy and paste into Affinity Photo, apply a Live Distort - Ripple Filter with minimal Intensity, copy and paste both curve and filter back into Designer. I've also applied a gradient to the fill:


Interestingly enough the top left is my attempt at a sketchy line using the pencil tool when the screen is NOT zoomed in, AFD just seems to smooth out the line as a matter of course. Notice the same line below (bot left) is the same line highlighted with the NODE tool - notice how few nodes are shown.


While on the top right is the same attempt when I have zoomed right into the canvas, for some reason the result is a lot more squiggly / sketchy. The same line below (bot right), again highlighted with the NODE tool - notice that there are many more nodes created and so a slightly better sketchy result.


Also attached is a page from one of our reports - and the reason why we bought the entire suite of AF Des/Pub/Photo products is so we can edit all aspects of the report - text etc in Pub, switch to Photo for touch-ups and switch to Des so we can create sketchy, editable vector diagrams at the right size right on the page. Save SO much valuable time in our busy office.


This particular report was done on PagePlus before we got AF in the office - the dwgs were done on Skethcbook Pro and we had to try and guess the line weights which is why when they come into the publishing programme and are scaled to fit nicely on the page the line weights are not consistent.


It think the best tool for it in Designer will be the Pencil Tool. At first it is important to deactivate the Stabilisator. But it seems that your right: Designer seems to smoothen the stroke a bit anyway. I can't see any other adjustments in Designer that could help. So it might be the best way to drink coffee til your hand shivers, zoom in a little (because that makes it easier) and draw slow.


Hi community, I have an issue. We want to show a plan in the sketchy visual style mode. I set the viewport in paper space to Sketchy but when in Print/Print Preview the ctb is ignored and I can't have black lines and the solids screening as was supposed to be. What did I haven't noticed? Is it possible what I want or I'm allowed to use ctb's only in the 2d wireframe visual style? I've searched here in the forum, I've got some similar issues but never this specific relation between sketchy visual style and ctb. Thanks for any help. Regards.


This is because Sketchy is a rendered visual style. These type of visual styles don't use ctb values and when printed, print out as an image rather than vector. You can adjust the how a rendered style displays by adjusting it's VISUALSTYLE.


Should add that the only visual style that uses ctb is 2D Wireframe - because it's not really a Style, but is the 'native' representation of the vector geometry. All the other Styles are rendered derivatives of the geometry, and the style of that rendering is controlled by VISUALSTYLES. That's also why 2D Wireframe is so much more stable, accurate and glitch-free than the others, not to mention fast.


I can't find a command that allows you to access, but with the paperspace viewport selected you can change the Shade Plot settings from the Property Bar. This overrides the current visual style of the viewport with the selected style when printed. It also provides some additional options, such as Legacy hidden that will print out a 3d view while respecting ctb settings.


I am inserting autocad drawings in Revit in order to draw walls over the plan view. However, the inserted drawing appears with sketchy lines instead of straight lines and it makes imposible to draw the Revit walls. I wonder what is happening, because I have done this in the past and the inserted drawings are ok.


That what I see when a linked file has an attached Xref that has extents violate Revit's threshold for DWG links/imports. Also are you sure about the units assigned to the link? It looks like it should be meters. That yields a DWG file that seems closer to the right scale.


My assumption (without real evidence) is that that this usage started with the sense "composed of an outline without much detail" (OED sense 2), and the figurative extension "Of a light, flimsy, unsubstantial or imperfect nature" (OED sense 3), further extended via the phonetic associations of neighbor-words like scummy, scurvy, scruffy, scuzzy, skeevy.


One way past this problem is to look for particular collocations (like "sketchy guy(s)") that are highly likely to involve the new sense. Tracking this phrase in Google books, we find this from the teen novel Brave New Girl (2001):


But before 1994, the Google Books trail goes cold for "sketchy guy(s)". Turning to "sketchy street", we find Amanda Anderson, Tainted Souls and Painted Faces: The Rhetoric of Fallenness in Victorian Culture (1993):


FWIW, my own memory is that I first heard this usage among students in the early 1990s. So I'd guess that it originated somewhat earlier, perhaps in late 1980s, and then spread through the usual youth-culture channels. I have no idea whether a particular geographical, ethnic, or affinity-group subculture was the source.


So whenever and wherever the new sense originated, it spread through the American population at large during the 1990s. This is consistent with the evidence from Google Books, where it starts showing up in 1994 or so.]


[(myl) It's hard to tell from the snippet-view context, but this fits well enough with the OED's sense 3 "Of a light, flimsy, unsubstantial or imperfect nature", which is attested back into the 1800s.]


I remember first seeing this word used in the snowboarding culture of the early 1990's, to describe terrain. You would describe a jump and/ or landing as sketchy if it was rutted, icy, had a rock that was hard to avoid, or whatever. I seem to recall seeing the word used this way both locally (in the interior of BC) and in national US magazines.


I suspect it's driven by the usage of "sketchy character". In crime and moral novels, there's clearly a correspondence between a character being cursorily developed and being flawed, impoverished or unsettling.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages