Big Win For Canada And Harper Governent In Getting Exemption From Obama Democrats' "Buy American" Protectionism
Crap Detector
--
Fifth and finally is the ubiquity of conflict.
It is human to hate. For self-definition and
motivation people need enemies: competition
in business, rivals in achievement, opponents
in politics. They naturally distrust and see as
threats all those who are different and have
the capability to harm them. The resolution of
one conflict and and the disappearance of one
enemy generate personal, social and political
forces that give rise to new ones.
--Samuel Huffington "The Clash of Civilizations and the
Remaking of World Order".
The liberal Canadian lamestream media have virtually ignored this big story.
Imagine what would have happened to Canadian exports to its leading
trading partner, the U.S., if the modern Smoot-Hawley politics of the
lamebrain Obama and his labor-union dominated Democrat congress enforced
trade
barriers to Canada. It would have been very bad for Canada's economy. Harper
has maintained friendly relations with the U.S. and has thus been
awarded this exemption as a good-will gesture.
Canuck57
>
>
Probably had a lot to do with the assurance of Canadian oil and
resources. Hey, if the middle east blows up, $400 a barrel from Canada
sounds a lot better than no oil at all.
World is currently ticking at 1935...
Limbaugh Whisperer
> o
"Moral nihilism is not the only central
feature of Naziism, but also
the common feature between it and
the Radical Right".--scholar Hugh Seton-Watson.
Another lie. It was never Obama's idea to have buy American, it was
congress. More proof that rightists are criminal liars whose only purpose
in life is to lie, cheat and deceive. If you lie to me face to face, you
would end up in a wheel chair or body bag. Lambourn also falsely claims
that the "liberal media" have being ingoring the story, a lie.
Proving that he's an insane conspiracy kook. Fox News never carried the
story because Fox News viewers don't know where they are themselves on a map,
let alone Canada.
Lambourn the coward also failed to mention that Canada must also allow US
firms to compete for public contracts in return, so once again Harper had to
bend over and let Obama fuck him in the ass. Just like 2006 when Harper
gave Bush $1 billion in a trade dispute where the US were in the wrong and
cheating on softwood lumber imports.
Harper is easily intimidated by Americans, he's a weak leader and a convert
to keynesian economics since Bush's supply side economic failure.
Lambourn doesn't have the balls to lie to people face to face, he hides in
the shadows behind his keyboard.
When's Harper going to deregulated Canadian banks so they'll fail like in the
US, thanks to Bush?
He won't now because he knows better. Harper even supports Canada's public
option and social safety net.
Harper is left of Obama, but the greasy little pervert Lambourn won't admit
it.
Lambourn's no capitalist. He's a retired former unionized government
employee living on a government pension and relying on socialist health care
who won't move to the USA because he wouldn't last a minute in their sink or
swim cut throat society and being old and frail, wouldn't be able to afford
for profit health insurance anyway.
David Deilley
>
> The liberal Canadian lamestream media have virtually ignored this big story.
YOU LIE!!!!
It was top of-the-fold, front-page headlines on several newspaperrs
when this happened. I am assuming that your alcoholism (or senility)
has now reached the point where you are starting to have "lost days"
-- days where the memory is entirely balcked out. How else to explain
your ridiculous and untrue statement that the mainstream media
i=ignored this story,
Canuck57
Laytoon got more air time this week. Harpo got about the same Canadian
air time as Williams which was not a lot.
CBC/CTV, urinalism at it's finest. I much prefer the internet.
Viejo Vizcacha
> On 07/02/2010 7:03 AM, Crap Detector wrote:
>
>
>
> Probably had a lot to do with the assurance of Canadian oil and
There is NO Canadian oil. The oil, like all minerals, belong to the
provinces.
Can't you get something, anything, right?
VV
Roy
==
Once it goes over the border the oil becomes Canadian sourced oil no
matter what province it comes from.
==
Remailer
The National Post had a very brief article on it. And today's Toronto
Sunday Sun does not even mention it. And these are supposed to be
conservative, pro-business newspapers. I regularly watch BNN (Canada's
business news TV channel) and there was hardly anything said
about it. Now you accuse me of lying; however, no balanced and fair
person would ever accuse me of that.
Viejo Vizcacha
Once in the US, it is their oil, no matter where it is coming from.
VV
Remailer
> On Feb 7, 1:12 pm, Canuck57 <Canuc...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > On 07/02/2010 7:03 AM, Crap Detector wrote:
>
> > Probably had a lot to do with the assurance of Canadian oil and
>
> There is NO Canadian oil. The oil, like all minerals, belong to the
> provinces.
That's not what statists Pierre Turdeau and Marc Lalonde thought when
they imposed the National Energy Policy on Alberta in the 1970s.
But you are a ignorant "liberal", statist who knows fuck all about
Canada's history and free-market economics. You are as dumb and
retarded as David Deilley.
> >
> > resources. Hey, if the middle east blows up, $400 a barrel from Canada
> > sounds a lot better than no oil at all.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Canuck57
> On Feb 7, 1:12 pm, Canuck57<Canuc...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On 07/02/2010 7:03 AM, Crap Detector wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Probably had a lot to do with the assurance of Canadian oil and
>
>
> There is NO Canadian oil. The oil, like all minerals, belong to the
> provinces.
Agreed. Even though the provinces that develop their reosurces keep the
loonie out of the dumpster are Canadians, the resource is the province.
> Can't you get something, anything, right?
You must be like a rabid rat. Wife didn't give you any?
Canuck57
And it should go to the highest bidder, none of this eastern horseshit
NEP. One good thing if NEP II started, seperation would sure take off.
Any western province leving confederation would do quite well without
Ottawa.
Canuck57
More precisely, when they paid for it.
The Doctor
David Deilley <david.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Feb 7, 6:03=A0am, "Crap Detector" <detec...@utopia.com> wrote:
>>
>> The liberal Canadian lamestream media have virtually ignored this big sto=
>ry.
>
>YOU LIE!!!!
>
>It was top of-the-fold, front-page headlines on several newspaperrs
>when this happened. I am assuming that your alcoholism (or senility)
>has now reached the point where you are starting to have "lost days"
>-- days where the memory is entirely balcked out. How else to explain
>your ridiculous and untrue statement that the mainstream media
Crap cannot detect properly.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
USenet NEwsgroups is the ULTMIATE form of blogging and social networking!
Viejo Vizcacha
> On Feb 7, 2:21 pm, Viejo Vizcacha<nats_ugly...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 1:12 pm, Canuck57<Canuc...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/02/2010 7:03 AM, Crap Detector wrote:
>>
>>> Probably had a lot to do with the assurance of Canadian oil and
>>
>> There is NO Canadian oil. The oil, like all minerals, belong to the
>> provinces.
> ***
> That's not what statists Pierre Turdeau and Marc Lalonde thought when
> they imposed the National Energy Policy on Alberta in the 1970s.
But that policy has been abandoned, and now the federal government can
only legislate about the pollution caused by the oil companies.
> But you are a ignorant "liberal", statist who knows fuck all about
> Canada's history and free-market economics. You are as dumb and
> retarded as David Deilley.
>>>
I feel honoured to be in such good company.
VV
Canuck57
> On 2010-02-07 14:50, Remailer wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 2:21 pm, Viejo Vizcacha<nats_ugly...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 7, 1:12 pm, Canuck57<Canuc...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 07/02/2010 7:03 AM, Crap Detector wrote:
>>>
>>>> Probably had a lot to do with the assurance of Canadian oil and
>>>
>>> There is NO Canadian oil. The oil, like all minerals, belong to the
>>> provinces.
>> ***
>> That's not what statists Pierre Turdeau and Marc Lalonde thought when
>> they imposed the National Energy Policy on Alberta in the 1970s.
>
>
> But that policy has been abandoned, and now the federal government can
> only legislate about the pollution caused by the oil companies.
Actually, more to the point, Ottawa backed off as the cash cows of the
west were getting pissed off enough to leave and to keep a lid on it
they backed off. Because in the end, if say thewestern four left
confederation, Ontario east would crater economically right for a third
world debtor nation.
I saw the results of a seperation plebicite that was pulled from public
view. It actually surprised me how much support exists for putting the
screws to Ottawa to shape up or do without.
>> But you are a ignorant "liberal", statist who knows fuck all about
>> Canada's history and free-market economics. You are as dumb and
>> retarded as David Deilley.
>>>>
>
> I feel honoured to be in such good company.
Then be prepared to pay the price. Governemtn is now realizing it can't
be so liberal and a dark cloud is moving over Ottawa statism. This
depression isn't over by a long shot. Government is the next fat
dysfunctional whale needing a bailout.
Canuck57
> In article<b68196cd-86d6-4416...@f17g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
> David Deilley<david.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 6:03=A0am, "Crap Detector"<detec...@utopia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The liberal Canadian lamestream media have virtually ignored this big sto=
>> ry.
>>
>> YOU LIE!!!!
>>
>> It was top of-the-fold, front-page headlines on several newspaperrs
>> when this happened. I am assuming that your alcoholism (or senility)
>> has now reached the point where you are starting to have "lost days"
>> -- days where the memory is entirely balcked out. How else to explain
>> your ridiculous and untrue statement that the mainstream media
>> i=3Dignored this story,
>
> Crap cannot detect properly.
Maybe because unlike a liberal, he does not have his nose up someones ass.
Winston
As if you're worthy of accusations. Do you take this as a job? In
reality, a cartoon name that types is not really a person of
distinction, though your attempts to impress them with your opinions
may be regarded as perfunctory.
Don't be so righteous and hyper-sensitive or you'll get an anvil
dropping on your head, Wiley.