Conservative White Males Charlie Yankee and E. Barry Bruyea will soon be shit out of luck at the ballot box
Robert Peffers
reflective of Canada's demographic and electoral realities. Crap
Detector and Canuck57 assume that all Canadians will eventually stage
a tax revolt and elect fiscally conservative candidates. However,
being such White-bred idiots who do not
understand how multi-culturalism and identity politics really work in
this country, and also most likely
having gone through life with little contact with non-Whites, they
both assume that the coming non-White
majority in Canada will alter the Canadian political landscape very
little.
Crap Detector and Canuck57 are both high assimilated White Anglo Saxon
Protestant Males who have
no connection at all to the original ethno-cultural roots of their
ancestors, and like most WASP's, tend to embrace a rabid individualism
which is at its core highly euro-centric. They simply do not seem to
understand that the vast majority of non-White Canadians, even those
who have been here for several generations, have a loyalty and an
identity first and foremost to kith and kin, that is their ethno-
cultural community. The vast majority of non-White Canadians (who were
20% of the total population in 2006 and are officially projected to be
more than 50% of the total population by the year 2050) tend to retain
their original ethno-cultural thinking, rooting, identity, language,
cultural and cuisine. Even those
non-White Canadians who hate taxes and big government spending, tend
to support high levels of
immigration and heavy government spending to settle new immigrants in
Canada (i.e., housing, education,
job training, language skills, welfare, EI, ect.). The vast majority
of non-White Canadians who will eventually be the majority in this
country, simply do not share the rabidly individualistic, unfettered
capitalist, mindless consumption, libertarian economics that high
assimilated WASP Canadians
such as Crap Detector and Canuck57.
The vast majority of non-White Canadians (even those who have been
here for several generations) tend
to overwhelmingly vote Liberal. Likewise, the vast majority of non-
Anglo Whites in English Canada such
as Italian-Canadians, Greek-Canadians, Portuguese-Canadians, ect; are
also loyal Liberal voters.
The vast majority of White Quebecois vote for the Bloc Quebecois or
the Liberals. Those few Quebecois Conservative MP's tend to be Red
Tories who support high levels of government spending.
If you go to any Liberal or NDP meeting in Toronto, Vancouver, or
Montreal; you will see a healthy mixture of whites and non-whites as
well as non-Anglo whites. However, if you go to any Conservative
meeting in even the most multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-lingual,
multi-religious, and multi-cultural riding in Toronto, Vancouver, or
Montreal; you will mostly only see White faces, in particular WASP
faces. The same goes for any meeting of the anti-tax and anti-social
programme Canadian Tax Payers Federation. This is mainly because
Canadians of WASP (British Isles) origin are the only ethnic group in
Canada who are assimilated and disconnected from their original
organic ethno-cultural roots. So of course, you will only hear WASP's
like Crap Detector and Canuck57 who rant and rave about their tax
dollars going to fund ethno-cultural parades and festivals. You will
NEVER near that from non-Whites or non-Anglo Whites, even the socially
conservatives ones.
Crap Detector, Canuck57, and the rest of the Reform/Alliance
libertarian fiscally conservative ilk simply
do not understand that their views are mostly a WASP social construct
which is not shared by other Canadians. Sadly for Crap Detector and
Canuck57, demography clearly shows that White Canadians in general and
WASP's in particular (the Conservative Party of Canada's most loyal
voters) are are dying breed and now have very low (below replacement)
levels of fertility versus very high (well above replacement) levels
of fertility and immigration for non-White Canadians. The following
article clearly outlines the trends. Furthermore, despite that article
is a few years old now, the Tories still can't make a breakthrough in
non-White majority Toronto.
All of Canada will be majority non-White within 40 years, so cry and
weep, you pair of right-wing WASP males ass holes. The fact is that
non-White Canadians and non-Anglo White Canadians simply do not
embrace your rabidly individualistic and unfettered capitalist WASP
bullshit. People who look, think,
and vote like both of you will simply be out manned and outvoted in
the future.
-Robert James (Auld Bob) Peffers
June 29, 2004
Canada's Harper Rejects Sailer Strategy—And Loses
By Kevin Michael Grace
[Previously by Kevin Michael Grace: Canadian Conservative Leader No
Immigration “Extremist.” Too Bad.]
Canada's federal Liberal Party won its fourth consecutive election
Monday—the first time this has been accomplished in almost a hundred
years. The Conservative opposition was stunned.
As well it might be. The Conservatives refuse to understand the
critical importance of race and the National Question in Canadian
elections. Unless they do, it could be another hundred years—or longer
— until they win.
The results
Liberals 135
Conservatives 99
Bloc Quebecois [Quebec separatists] 54
New Democratic Party [labor union social democrats] 19
Independents 1
[Rough Guide to the political parties of Canada here]
Total seats—308. Needed for control of parliament—155
Prime Minister Paul Martin, the Liberal leader, was hurt badly—reduced
to a minority in Parliament. He will be forced to govern with the
assistance of the NDP and possibly the Bloc, which both share his
social leftism, if not his (relative) fiscal prudence.
But he survived.
The francophone (French-speaking) separatist Bloc—they prefer
“sovereigntist”— took 54 of the 75 seats in Quebec, the only province
they contest. This is a very strong showing. The Liberals took the
other 21 Quebec seats, basically the Anglophone (“English-speaking”)
or immigrant districts.
The Bloc triumph is proof, if proof is needed, that the regular
burials of Quebec separatism that are a feature of Canadian commentary
are always premature.
Another Quebec separatism crisis is inevitable this decade. In Quebec
at least, the nation-state is not dead.
The real election campaign took place in Anglophone Canada—a nation
which, since Pierre Trudeau, no longer has a state.
The debate was almost issue-free. Conservative leader Stephen Harper
abandoned his putative conservatism, minimizing his differences with
the Liberals. He played me-too with the Liberals on more billions for
Canada's decrepit, statist medical system. He joined them in declaring
his party “pro-choice.”
His immigration policy was even worse than I described in VDARE.COM
recently. His immigration spokeswoman told the Vancouver Sun that her
party, like the Liberals and the NDP, support immigration of 300,000
annually (i.e. three times the current U.S. level relative to
population). She explained that Conservatives' formerly restrictionist
policy had “matured.”
As in the U.S., there seems to be no limit to “conservative” stupidity
on immigration. It was the Liberal Party that decided to abolish the
almost “lily-white” Canada through Third World immigration in the
1970s, declaring the country officially “multicultural.” The Liberals
did this for a reason. The “visible minority” cohort—13.4% in 2001, up
from 11.2% in 1996—is apparently grateful. In the 2000 election, the
Liberals took 72% of the non-European vote, the Canadian Alliance (the
Conservatives' predecessor) a paltry 14%.
Yet once again in 2004, the Canadian Right made its ritualistic,
idiotic Wall Street Journal / Tamar Jacoby noises about immigrants
being “entrepreneurial” and “socially conservative.”
Canadian immigrant voters seem to care about two issues only:
immigration and the ethnic spoils system. They trust the Liberals and
no one else on these issues. Conservative Prime Minister Brian
Mulroney was the most pro-immigration leader in Canadian history. He
also instituted ethnic Affirmative Action quotas. Nonetheless, visible
minority voters remained Liberal. In 1993 the Conservatives were wiped
out in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver (and everywhere else).
Now, in 2004, Stephen Harper's Conservatives have had a result almost
as disastrous in these cities.
The Conservatives now claim they lost because their “message” was
rejected in Ontario. But what they obdurately refuse to understand is
that it was non-white voters in Ontario who rejected their message.
Greater Toronto has 45 of Ontario's 106 seats. It was 36.8% non-white
in 2001, up from 31.6% in 1996. The Liberals took 41 of these 45 seats
on Monday, the Conservatives only three.
The truth about the Conservatives' present and future is staring them
in the face, but they refuse to see it.
The provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and
Ontario constitute Anglophone Canada's electoral heartland. They have
198 out of 308 national seats. On Monday's results, the Conservatives
are already the leading party in the heartland provinces.
Voting percentages, B.C. to Ontario, 2004
B.C. (36 seats) Conservatives 36.2%, Liberals 28.6%
Alberta (28 seats) Conservatives 61.6%, Liberals 22.0%
Saskatchewan (14 seats) Conservatives 41.8%, Liberals 27.2%
Manitoba (14 seats) Conservatives 39.1%, Liberals 33.2%
Ontario (106 seats) Conservatives 31.5%, Liberals 44.7%
Total vote: Conservatives 37.6%, Liberals 36.9%
Total seats (of 198) Conservatives 92, Liberals 89
The Conservatives are already the solid choice of white voters in
these five provinces. If we assume that non-white voters in these
provinces (17.0% in 2001) repeated their 2000 voting pattern, and we
then remove them from the equation, we get this result for the
heartland:
Conservatives 42.4%, Liberals 29.7%
In Ontario (19.1% visible minority in 2001), we get almost a draw:
Conservatives 35.6%, Liberals 38.2%
So much for Ontario rejecting the Conservative “message.” Non-white
Ontario rejected it. Non-white Ontario—i.e. Ontario prior to Pierre
Trudeau's immigration reforms, so eerily similar to the Lyndon
Johnson's 1965 Immigration Act—did not.
Given that Canadian electoral law gives undue weight to non-urban
ridings, the Conservatives would probably have won a majority of
Ontario seats if only white votes counted.
If Canada's immigration pattern continues, the Conservatives are
doomed. Unless, of course, they start grazing where the grass is.
As Steve Sailer has repeatedly pointed out in the U.S. context, white
votes count just as much as non-white votes. And there remain are a
lot more of the former than the latter. As of 2001, Canada was still
86.6% white.
Yet Canada is governed as if whites were in the minority—they are
oppressed by massive immigration, quotas and hate laws. No party
speaks for them.
The Conservatives could—and should—be that party.
But unless they stop drinking multicultural Kool-Aid, they are doomed
to suicide.
And no-one need mourn.
Kevin Michael Grace lives in Victoria, British Columbia. His blog,
TheAmbler.com, features original commentaries.
http://www.vdare.com/misc/grace_canada.htm
socialist that fear the truth and want the new Holocaust for 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vo3HMYLutPw
"Robert Peffers" <auldbobp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3847a84a-b076-40d8...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...