Fifth Estate shows the evidence of controlled demolition
anarchore
the predictable scoffing from the interviewer.
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/
http://www.ae911truth.org/info/112
CBC TV’s “Fifth Estate” Program Airs AE911Truth Nov 27
— Richard Gage, AIA
On September 11 of this year, we were interviewed on September 11 in
New York at the We Demand Transparency conference by the Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation’s “Fifth Estate” program. This is the
equivalent of “60 Minutes” in Canada. It is set to air on November 27.
The producers of the National Geographic Channel assured us that they
would air the evidence we highlighted for them on their show 9/11:
Science and Conspiracy. They even showed us these segments in their
“rough cut,” which we were quite satisfied with. However, the final
show aired none of our evidence, and they claimed that we had none. We
were determined not to let this happen a second time with the CBC.
We recorded an agreement with Oleh Rumak, executive producer, that we
would grant an interview only under the condition that they would air
the evidence of free-fall, molten metal, iron-rich microspheres, nano-
thermite chips, lateral ejections, and pulverized concrete. Even
though we trusted before, and were burned, we trusted again. So tune
in on Nov 27, you in the Canadian 9/11 Truth community, and let the
rest of us know what you think of the show. Does the Fifth Estate have
integrity? Will the CBC honor its promise?
Roy
There should have been scoffing as no concrete absolute evidence was
shown regarding you kooks and your conspiracy hoax.
==
Canuck57
> It was pretty good! This really damaged the official story, despite
> the predictable scoffing from the interviewer.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/
>
> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/112
>
> � Richard Gage, AIA
CBC, Liberal media pigs at the trough. They get paid $2 billion a year
to make sure we don't hate our own government.
macksamillion
"Roy" <wil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:037871a6-6b73-469d...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
There should have been scoffing as no concrete absolute evidence was
shown regarding you kooks and your conspiracy hoax.
Well, you know, there are still some very stupid people out there (they're also known as
'Americans') who think that Lee Harvey Oswald killed John F Kennedy. Of course, the
sudden assassination of Oswald should be of no suspicion to anyone . . . . .
macksamillion
>> It was pretty good! This really damaged the official story, despite
>> the predictable scoffing from the interviewer.
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/
>>
>> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/112
>>
>> � Richard Gage, AIA
"Canuck57" <Canu...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:lyXTm.5417$ha3....@newsfe19.iad...
> CBC, Liberal media pigs at the trough. They get paid $2 billion a year to make sure we
> don't hate our own government.
YOU hate both the Tories and the Liberals. Did the CBC get to you too?
gmr36v...@free.teranews.cm
"Roy" <wil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:037871a6-6b73-469d...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> It was pretty good! This really damaged the official story, despite
> the predictable scoffing from the interviewer.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/
>
> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/112
>
> CBC TV's "Fifth Estate" Program Airs AE911Truth Nov 27
>
> On September 11 of this year, we were interviewed on September 11 in
> New York at the We Demand Transparency conference by the Canadian
> Broadcasting Corporation's "Fifth Estate" program. This is the
> equivalent of "60 Minutes" in Canada. It is set to air on November 27.
>
> The producers of the National Geographic Channel assured us that they
> would air the evidence we highlighted for them on their show 9/11:
> Science and Conspiracy. They even showed us these segments in their
> "rough cut," which we were quite satisfied with. However, the final
> show aired none of our evidence, and they claimed that we had none. We
> were determined not to let this happen a second time with the CBC.
>
> We recorded an agreement with Oleh Rumak, executive producer, that we
> would grant an interview only under the condition that they would air
> the evidence of free-fall, molten metal, iron-rich microspheres, nano-
> thermite chips, lateral ejections, and pulverized concrete. Even
> though we trusted before, and were burned, we trusted again. So tune
> in on Nov 27, you in the Canadian 9/11 Truth community, and let the
> rest of us know what you think of the show. Does the Fifth Estate have
> integrity? Will the CBC honor its promise?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/
>There should have been scoffing as no concrete absolute evidence was
>shown regarding you kooks and your conspiracy hoax.
Roy, have you seen pictures of building seven collapse? Are you saying you
think this is what actually can happen to a building that has exteriour
damage? Do you have any background in engineering? Did you study the way
these buildings were put together?
Roy
$10h...@free.teranews.cm> wrote:
> "Roy" <wila...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
There was enough extraneous material raining down to precipitate a
collapse and THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED. Jeez, you are dense.
==
Chom Noamsky
> CBC, Liberal media pigs at the trough. They get paid $2 billion a year
> to make sure we don't hate our own government.
I don't watch TV, but CBC Radio is worth twice whatever it costs. It's
the only thing between us and complete stupefaction (like what Fox News
does to its audience).
gmr36v...@free.teranews.cm
LOL! Dense would thinking that engineers could design steel framed buildings
that fall into their own footprint, at near freefall no less, due to
"extraneous material raining down" on them....
Not only do you not have any engeneering training, you have little to no
common sense. These buildings are designed to withstand earthquakes, and the
ONLY way to make them collapse into themselves is to remove the inner
supporting structure.
Roy
>
> - Show quoted text -
Then its a wonder that your skull doesn't collapse with no supporting
brain to stop it. Are you an "engenneer" with shit for brains?
==
Canuck57
I do believe the buildings behaved the way they should have and did.
And I have a background in engineering.
While facist Muslim fanatics and idle weak minds would like to think
differently does not make it so. And CBC just cheapens it's liberal
urinalism even more buy publishing such drive. Obviously the
goverrnemnt is desperate to get peoples minds off the real issues, a
government spend out of control going broke.
What a waste of Canadian tax dollars CBC is. Must be they are all
gooding off this month and nothing better to put on TV.
BTW, even got to see the Pentagon up close. Deaply thought provoking.
While all the chickenshits and liberals were hiding under their beds, my
wife and I took the opportunity to go to DC for a week. No lineups and
choice accomodations, was in and out of Smithsonians and Memorials in
record time. Was a hoot.
CBC would have been better to cover the local tourism related business
and how they suffered. There were a lot more than the 4000 victims that
we butchered in the name of Allah the pedofiliac butcher.
Or why the US didn't just nuke them.
Canuck57
I someone doubt you are an engineer.
20,000 gallons of aircraft fuel, wide open windows for air, removal of
supports by intense heat is most likely. Certainly not hard to belive
it would get over 1000 degrees.
Know that in medevil times, a smelter was a bellows and coal could
refine metal.
Canuck57
>> anarchore wrote:
>>> It was pretty good! This really damaged the official story, despite
>>> the predictable scoffing from the interviewer.
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/
>>>
>>> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/112
>>>
>>> � Richard Gage, AIA
>
> "Canuck57" <Canu...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:lyXTm.5417$ha3....@newsfe19.iad...
>> CBC, Liberal media pigs at the trough. They get paid $2 billion a year to make sure we
>> don't hate our own government.
>
> YOU hate both the Tories and the Liberals. Did the CBC get to you too?
CBC is the media herd control branch of Ottawa. They get $2 billion a
year, every year. Part of your taxes (and mine) go to this corporate
welfare turkey. You bet for $2 billion each year they will tow the
government line be they Lib or Con.
Canuck57
Canadians are politicially "stupefaction" (stupidification?) as it is,
CBC just adds to it to keep people like pacified sheep. Works quite
well for Ottawa.
I view Ottawa as the issues as any Liberal or Conservative needs to ask
themselves has anything really changed? If you came back from Alpha
Centary and 8 years of travel could you really see a difference?
I would bet anyone $50,000 that if I took the Liberal policy, and
conservative policy and swapped the parties names and hit the street for
a random sampling less than 20% of the people could tell the difference.
80:20 rule, 80% are clueless.
yp
>
> - Show quoted text -
I am an engineer from the most prestigious university in the country
(according to Maclean's ratings), namely McGill U, and have a lot of
relevant experience particularly in metallurgy. And I can tell you
that no one, but no one will make me believe that the twin towers
collapsed they way they did because they were hit by airplanes in the
upper levels of the buildings. In fact the towers were specifically
designed to withstand such hits. And as to the third building which
was merely hit by some debris, it is ludicrous to claim that it
collapsed in free fall all by itself. I am convinced that those
buildings were made to collapse by a process of controlled demolition
and I am happy to see that so many U.S. engineers and architects have
signed a petition and demand a review of the Commission's conclusions.
Canuck57
McGill, Liberal losers with their egos pumped up like a dirigible.
You are a BSer actually. As even McGill does not graduate that much
incompetance. Each and every floor has fasteners with a sheer, what
them with enough vertical kinetic energy and Newton's apple theeory
takes are of the rest. And I haven't heard of any building built in the
era, let alone today that is supposed to stand with 20,000 gallons of
aircraft fuel and a side impact. You are a BSer.
Those that think this was a consiracy and practice engineering are one
of two types of people.
The rarer ones are money grubing for a fat contract to determine what is
already known. 19 crazy muslims carried and cause death in a mass murder.
The second type is more popular, usually a muslim or skin head nutball.
The kind of idiot humanity is embarased to call human. A cowardly
suckle, insecure especially with women and generally uninteligent
although they are often so stupid they can't figure it out. Want to be
Hitlers, little cowards shits like to pack hunt hiding behind children
and women. Low respect for others freedoms.
Roy
>
> - Show quoted text -
==
That yp character is soooo full of shit. What else is there to say?
==
terry
> x-no-archive: yes
> > >>>> damage? Do you have any background in engineering? Did you study the way
> > >>>> these buildings were put together?- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>> - Show quoted text -
> > >>>> There was enough extraneous material raining down to precipitate a
> > >>>> collapse and THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED. Jeez, you are dense.
> > >>> LOL! Dense would thinking that engineers could design steel framed buildings
> > >>> that fall into their own footprint, at near freefall no less, due to
> > >>> "extraneous material raining down" on them....
> > >>> common sense. These buildings are designed to withstand earthquakes, and the
> > >>> ONLY way to make them collapse into themselves is to remove the inner
> > >>> supporting structure.
> > >> I someone doubt you are an engineer.
>
> > >> 20,000 gallons of aircraft fuel, wide open windows for air, removal of
> > >> it would get over 1000 degrees.
>
> > >> refine metal.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > > I am an engineer from the most prestigious university in the country
> > > (according to Maclean's ratings), namely McGill U, and have a lot of
> > > relevant experience particularly in metallurgy. And I can tell you
> > > that no one, but no one will make me believe that the twin towers
> > > collapsed they way they did because they were hit by airplanes in the
> > > upper levels of the buildings. In fact the towers were specifically
> > > designed to withstand such hits. And as to the third building which
> > > was merely hit by some debris, it is ludicrous to claim that it
> > > collapsed in free fall all by itself. I am convinced that those
> > > buildings were made to collapse by a process of controlled demolition
> > > and I am happy to see that so many U.S. engineers and architects have
> > > signed a petition and demand a review of the Commission's conclusions.
>
> > McGill, Liberal losers with their egos pumped up like a dirigible.
>
> > You are a BSer actually. As even McGill does not graduate that much
> > them with enough vertical kinetic energy and Newton's apple theory
> > takes are of the rest. And I haven't heard of any building built in the
> > era, let alone today that is supposed to stand with 20,000 gallons of
> > aircraft fuel and a side impact. You are a BSer.
>
> > of two types of people.
>
> > already known. 19 crazy Muslims carried and cause death in a mass murder.
>
> > The second type is more popular, usually a Muslim or skin head nutball.
> > The kind of idiot humanity is embarrassed to call human. A cowardly
> > suckle, insecure especially with women and generally unintelligent
> > although they are often so stupid they can't figure it out. Want to be
> > Hitlers, little cowards shits like to pack hunt hiding behind children
> > and women. Low respect for others freedoms.
>
> lucky Arabs conspiracy theory has to be more than a few bricks short
> of a load.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
===============================================================
Me thinks thou dost protest too much ..........................
Shakespeare.
There is no 'good' aspect of the 9/11 incidents.
However the perpetrators were:
a) Living openly in The USA.
b) Were allowed to directly enter by USA authorities. They did NOT, as
some have wrongly claimed, enter surreptitiously or secretly via some
other country such as Mexico or Canada.
c) Some attended US flight schools where some of their actions/
motivations were deemed suspicious, long before the 'incidents'
occurred, but no action was taken by USA authorities!
d) They hi-jacked scheduled US flights using;
e) US purchased box-cutters.
f) They crashed planes fully loaded with fuel for long USA flights
into their targets killing many innocent people. Some were not US
citizens.
g) The effect of their actions on improving the lot and welfare of
their type of society has been absolutely negative or ineffectual.
e) Despite certain extra security costs and inconveniences to the many
travelling members of the public, is it not noticeable that there
really has been very little long term effect? We still fly in great
numbers, go for vacations, go to work (provided the banks will still
allow us to be employed and don't repossess the too expensive houses
they allowed us to buy!) and carry on life exactly as before, making
donations to help others, celebrating OUR traditional holidays etc.
etc.
f) And; Oh yes; two pointless and unnecessary wars ............... now
deemed by just about everyone as 'Mission NOT accomplished'!
No need to look for other conspiracies; just at our incompetence and
too trusting society. We have to realise that there are people and
societies where looking in your face and smiling while stabbing you in
the back/cheating you to achieve their aims is considered normal or
admirable behaviour. Where our so called recognition of 'Human
Rights', 'Ethical treatment of others' or 'Fair dealing' is considered
as weakness!
Roy
>
> - Show quoted text -
==
That pretty well sums it up.
No further comment required.
==
Canuck57
Yet you ignore the reason muslim and facist leaders hate the USA...and
prote the hate even inside of Canada and the US.
How date the infidels give personal freedoms and affluance to so many.
People are to be ruled with an iron fist and trated like slaves.
US, if Obama had balls would no honor any UN motion predominanly passed
by ditators, non-democratic muslim fuedal societies and those with the
real rights violations. Som Shara law freak doesn't think twice about
cutting off heads.
The big mistake the west makes is thinking this is a conventional war,
it is a cultural war between facist segments of muslims and others
against the rest.
Canuck57
> x-no-archive: yes
>> That pretty well sums it up.
>>
>> No further comment required.
>> =
>
>
>
> 911 Coincidence theories.
>
> Who benefited from 911?
No one did.
fred
news:%HXTm.78887$W77....@newsfe11.iad:
> .. There should have been scoffing as no concrete absolute evidence
> was shown regarding you kooks and your conspiracy hoax.
>
> Well, you know, there are still some very stupid people out there
> (they're also known as 'Americans') who think that Lee Harvey Oswald
> killed John F Kennedy. Of course, the sudden assassination of Oswald
> should be of no suspicion to anyone . . . . .
>
No, not in a country which has guns available to anyone, the mob and
strip club owners who live in Dallas.
fred
news:tu_Tm.44344$Sw5...@newsfe16.iad:
>
> "Roy" <wil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:037871a6-6b73-469d...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com.
Oh god, we've got a live one here. tag him quick before he falls of the
end of the earth.
How *exactly* do you think demolition experts bring down a building
anyways?
First they weaken all the support members and then when they're ready,
they blow out the rest starting from the inside going into the outside
in quick sucession. In the World Tade Center towers, as soon as the
planes hit, they blew the asbestos insulation off of the steel members
which allowed them to be softened by the *thousands* of gallons of jet
fuel - kerosene in effect - still in the wing and belly tanks. When this
softened the steel sufficiently, th weight of the floors above caused the
3 or 4 floors arround the crash to collapse and the force of that drop was
greater than the bulding supports were designed or able to handle so you had
catastrophic failure all the way down. And BTW it *didn't collapse into
one little space as any shot of the aftermath will show - it destroyed
several surrounding buildings as well. The only reason it didn't damage
more buildings is that the entire block was occupied by just those two
buildings and empty space. Imagine Parlement Hill with just two appartment
buildings at opposite corners.
fred
news:40d50c7b-4ae5-43f6...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups.com:
They certainly were not. No building is or can be.
> And as to the third building which
> was merely hit by some debris, it is ludicrous to claim that it
> collapsed in free fall all by itself. I am convinced that those
> buildings were made to collapse by a process of controlled demolition
> and I am happy to see that so many U.S. engineers and architects have
> signed a petition and demand a review of the Commission's conclusions.
And you know nothing of mechanical engineering. Claiming you know
something of engineering so you can backup some claim by flat earthers
doesn't make you right.
fred
news:8c8f8cdc-d664-4fed...@x15g2000vbr.googlegroups.com:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Canuck57 wrote:
>> yp wrote:
>> > On Dec 13, 8:44 pm, Canuck57 <Canuc...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >> HostNotFo...@teranews.com wrote:
>> >>> "Roy" <wila...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>> news:f68abbc5-bdc6-4edc...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups
>>
>> The second type is more popular, usually a muslim or skin head
>> nutball. The kind of idiot humanity is embarased to call human. A
>> cowardly suckle, insecure especially with women and generally
>> uninteligent although they are often so stupid they can't figure it
>> out. Want to be Hitlers, little cowards shits like to pack hunt
>> hiding behind children and women. Low respect for others freedoms.
>
> ROFLMAO. Anyone still believing the official 19 angry and incredibly
> lucky arabs conspiracy theory has to be more than a few bricks short
> of a load.
Enter nymshift #2. Give it up, your fooling no one but yourself.