Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
These newsgroups are proposed for deletion
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Mark Brader
Jan 11, 1985, 5:09:58 PM1/11/85
to
These newsgroups are proposed for deletion. Please see the referenced
article in ont.general.
article in ont.general.
MAIL responses to {utzoo,utcs,utcsrgv,dciem,nrcaero}!lsuc!msb.
Mark Brader
n
Jan 12, 1985, 8:45:58 PM1/12/85
to
Mark, the proposed groups ont.micro, ont.micro.mac, and ont.singles are for
information specific to ONTARIO. Why burden the net with text that is only
of interest to a local geographic area?? Only if people would use these groups
where it makes sense to.
information specific to ONTARIO. Why burden the net with text that is only
of interest to a local geographic area?? Only if people would use these groups
where it makes sense to.
References: <2...@lsuc.UUCP>, <2...@lsuc.UUCP>
--
---------
Bill McLean @ Ont. Ministry of Health
{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!isis
Laura Creighton
Jan 12, 1985, 8:53:56 PM1/12/85
to
Nuke the groups. The idea is to post to net.micro or net.singles with
a DISTRIBUTION of ``ont''. The ont groups were a good idea when there
was no distribution feature, but those days are long past...
a DISTRIBUTION of ``ont''. The ont groups were a good idea when there
was no distribution feature, but those days are long past...
Laura Creighton
utzoo!laura
Alex Nishri
Jan 15, 1985, 2:09:31 AM1/15/85
to
I subscribe to ont.micro but not to net.micro. I just don't have time to
read all the articles in net.micro, but I am interested in what people
locally have to say about micros. The fact that articles are infrequent
in ont.micro means I stay subscribed to it.
As I understand "Distribution", it will require me to read net.micro in order
to get the same information I get in ont.micro. (If I am wrong correct me.)
I vote for keeping ont.micro.
0 new messages