Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Support for the PARTITIONISTS of Quebec.....

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Karen Gordon

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to


Time for each and every province to speak out in support of the federalists
in Quebec..... this from B.C.....

(Vancouver Sun article of February 14/97; Barbara Yaffe - columnist):

B.C. SUPPORT SOUGHT FOR QUEBECERS WISHING TO REMAIN IN CANADA

Across thousands of miles comes a plaintive cry for help. Quebecers who
want to remain part of Canad are hoping people from as far away as British
Columbia will come forward to offer them support, Montreal lawyer Anthony
Housefather says.

He is aa municipal councillor for Hampstead, a quiet upper-middle-class part
of Montreal that is 86% English-speaking and aggressively fedeeralist.

Housefather, a fully bilingual anglo whose family has been in Quebec 140
years, is first a federalist. But he says if Quebec should separate he will
act as an advocate of 'partitionism'.

This controversial concept gained new repectability a year ago when it was
mentioned by federal intergovernmental Affairs Minister Stephane Dion. It's
the seeking of a way - in the event of separation - to keep in Canada THE
PARTS OF QUEBEC that wish to remain.

To that end, 19 Quebec municipalities since last fall HAVE PASSED RESOLUTIONS
paving the way for their possible partition from a separate Quebec.
[....]
The Parti Quebecois government dismisses the notion of partition. PQ minister
Sylvain Simard said in Vancouver last week: "It cannot happen. It doesn't
exist. For us, it is not a negotiable question."

Housefather says: "The separatists dismiss it; they say it's a block or a
house that wants to partition.
But in fact you have a whole contiguous chunk from the Ontario border to the
end of Montreal. To me, that's very feasible for that area to remain part of
Canada."
Housefather is referring to 34 contiguous ridings - in the Outaouais region
around Hull and in western and central portion of Montreal - that voted NO
to separatism in the October 1995 referendum.
He says it's illogical to allow separatists to decide their fate and to deny
that right to federalists.
[....]
He says that by supporting partition they can help discourage separatism.
That's because Quebecers don't even want to think about the fracturing of
their province.

Also, as Canadians, BC people simply "have an interest in standing up for
their brothers and sisters, no matter where they are in the country."
And of course, it's not in BC's interest to "throw away a big part of
Canada. It makes no sense."

Another reason to speak up is that it may help Canada retain the city of
MONTREAL. Housefather asserts that, without a separatist threat and with
its bilingual workforce, Montreal has the potential to be a thriving, vibrant
part of the country.
[....]
Housefather and other 'partitionists' want a clear statement from Ottawa
that it will protect Quebecers' right to remain Canadian.
He also wants provincial governments to make statements in support of the
partitionist movement. And it would be helpful if municipalities in BC
and elsewhere would pass resolutions supporting their PRO-PARTITIONIST
brethren in Quebec.

What is needed from the rest of the country is "moral support", Housefather
says.
"It would be an effective disincentive for the separatists. And it would
provide some reassurance for those of us who want to remain Canadian."
_____________________

(Karen): Well, there it is. Quebec's federalists have asked for the help
of 'other Canadians' in support for keeping them a part of this country.
No way can we let them down. No way can our provincial governments not
respond with full support.
If it means fracturing Quebec into the pieces which contain the die-hard
separatists and those who remain heart-and-soul Canadian, so be it. This
seems to be the only way to convince those intent on splitting the country
that the split may be smaller than they think.....

You have the support of this BC native and resident Ontarian....anyone who
sees this message and can relay it to Mr Housefather (Montreal lawyer) is
most welcome to.
You will not be left alone in your struggle against the Bloc's separatist
movement. More will end up staying with us than leaving..... you can bet
on it. And on us.

--
==============================================================================


G.C.

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to

In article <5ebdvl$k...@freenet-news.carleton.ca>, ar...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
says...

>
>
>
>Time for each and every province to speak out in support of the federalists
>in Quebec..... this from B.C.....
>
>(Vancouver Sun article of February 14/97; Barbara Yaffe - columnist):
>
>B.C. SUPPORT SOUGHT FOR QUEBECERS WISHING TO REMAIN IN CANADA
>
<Snip>

>
>(Karen): Well, there it is. Quebec's federalists have asked for the help
>of 'other Canadians' in support for keeping them a part of this country.
>No way can we let them down. No way can our provincial governments not
>respond with full support.
>If it means fracturing Quebec into the pieces which contain the die-hard
>separatists and those who remain heart-and-soul Canadian, so be it. This
>seems to be the only way to convince those intent on splitting the country
>that the split may be smaller than they think.....
>
>You have the support of this BC native and resident Ontarian....anyone who
>sees this message and can relay it to Mr Housefather (Montreal lawyer) is
>most welcome to.
>You will not be left alone in your struggle against the Bloc's separatist
>movement. More will end up staying with us than leaving..... you can bet
>on it. And on us.
>
>--
>===========================================================================
>
Karen, check her article on the 17th. It sounds like there is
some support for this option from at least a few B.C. politicians,
like the B.C. Liberal leader and the Mayor of Vancouver.

If the separatists/secessionists go ahead with another referendum
for the dismantling of Canada, the proposal for a partitioned
Outaouais region with Montreal as the capital sounds interesting,
as well as the possibility of making it a federally operated
district like Washington, D.C., as suggested by Bob Tarplett.

G.C.


Hugues Boily

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to

Karen Gordon wrote:
>
> Time for each and every province to speak out in support of the federalists
> in Quebec..... this from B.C.....
>
> (Vancouver Sun article of February 14/97; Barbara Yaffe - columnist):
>
> B.C. SUPPORT SOUGHT FOR QUEBECERS WISHING TO REMAIN IN CANADA
>
> (Karen): Well, there it is. Quebec's federalists have asked for the help
> of 'other Canadians' in support for keeping them a part of this country.
> No way can we let them down. No way can our provincial governments not
> respond with full support.
> If it means fracturing Quebec into the pieces which contain the die-hard
> separatists and those who remain heart-and-soul Canadian, so be it. This
> seems to be the only way to convince those intent on splitting the country
> that the split may be smaller than they think.....
>
> You have the support of this BC native and resident Ontarian....anyone who
> sees this message and can relay it to Mr Housefather (Montreal lawyer) is
> most welcome to.
> You will not be left alone in your struggle against the Bloc's separatist
> movement. More will end up staying with us than leaving..... you can bet
> on it. And on us.
>
> --
> ==============================================================================


...dag-dag-dag-dag-dag-dag-dag-dad-dag-dag-dag-dag-dag

Le Guerrier Louis-Luc

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to

cha...@jumppoint.com (G.C.) writes:

>In article <5ebdvl$k...@freenet-news.carleton.ca>, ar...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
>says...
>>
>>
>>

>>Time for each and every province to speak out in support of the federalists
>>in Quebec..... this from B.C.....
>>
>>(Vancouver Sun article of February 14/97; Barbara Yaffe - columnist):
>>
>>B.C. SUPPORT SOUGHT FOR QUEBECERS WISHING TO REMAIN IN CANADA
>>

><Snip>


>>
>>(Karen): Well, there it is. Quebec's federalists have asked for the help
>>of 'other Canadians' in support for keeping them a part of this country.
>>No way can we let them down. No way can our provincial governments not
>>respond with full support.
>>If it means fracturing Quebec into the pieces which contain the die-hard
>>separatists and those who remain heart-and-soul Canadian, so be it. This
>>seems to be the only way to convince those intent on splitting the country
>>that the split may be smaller than they think.....
>>
>>You have the support of this BC native and resident Ontarian....anyone who
>>sees this message and can relay it to Mr Housefather (Montreal lawyer) is
>>most welcome to.
>>You will not be left alone in your struggle against the Bloc's separatist
>>movement. More will end up staying with us than leaving..... you can bet
>>on it. And on us.
>>
>>--

>>===========================================================================
>>
>Karen, check her article on the 17th. It sounds like there is
>some support for this option from at least a few B.C. politicians,
>like the B.C. Liberal leader and the Mayor of Vancouver.

>If the separatists/secessionists go ahead with another referendum
>for the dismantling of Canada, the proposal for a partitioned
>Outaouais region with Montreal as the capital sounds interesting,
>as well as the possibility of making it a federally operated
>district like Washington, D.C., as suggested by Bob Tarplett.

>G.C.
As a francophone of Montreal, I should say that's a great idea, I want to
get rid of the separatist threats and live peacefully in my country. Whether
my province is Quebec (ideally), Ontario, or a federal territory, that doesn't
really matter as long as I continue to be part of Canada. If separatist want
a partition (I said partition), they'll get one: we'll leave Quebec city
and the eastern for them, the Natives will certainly keep the northern Quebec
in Canada, and we, in the West of Quebec, will keep our land in Canada anyway.

Please wherever you are in Canada, think about us and show your endeavour to
save our Quebec province from corruption.

Salutations à tous les Canadiens Français

Louis-Luc Le Guerrier

Granger Marc

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to

Le Guerrier Louis-Luc (legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA) wrote:
: As a francophone of Montreal, I should say that's a great idea, I want to

: get rid of the separatist threats and live peacefully in my country. Whether
: my province is Quebec (ideally), Ontario, or a federal territory, that doesn't
: really matter as long as I continue to be part of Canada. If separatist want
: a partition (I said partition), they'll get one: we'll leave Quebec city
: and the eastern for them, the Natives will certainly keep the northern Quebec
: in Canada, and we, in the West of Quebec, will keep our land in Canada anyway.
:
: Please wherever you are in Canada, think about us and show your endeavour to
: save our Quebec province from corruption.
:
: Salutations à tous les Canadiens Français
:
: Louis-Luc Le Guerrier

--

Un autre qui prend ses reves pour des realites... t'as jamais vu les
sondages a ce sujet, n'est-ce pas? Une chance, parce que sinon, ton
enthousiasme en prendrait un maudit coup!

Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to
my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)

Bruce J Schuck

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to

In article <5ed1ec$2...@epervier.CC.UMontreal.CA>, gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) wrote:

>Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to
>my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)

Since when has "Canada" become a synonym for intercourse?

"I'd love to Canada you?"

"Canada off?"


Le Guerrier Louis-Luc

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to

gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) writes:

>Un autre qui prend ses reves pour des realites... t'as jamais vu les
>sondages a ce sujet, n'est-ce pas? Une chance, parce que sinon, ton
>enthousiasme en prendrait un maudit coup!

Our rights as citizens override any poll.


>Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to
>my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)

No, I'll take off QUEBEC instead... Get into your barn in St-Jean ans shut up!


Peter S. Saly

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to

Granger Marc <gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA> wrote in article >

>
>
> Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to
> my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)
>

you mean like this ?

Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec, CANADA


Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to

Granger Marc wrote:

[légère coupure , faute de budget]

> UEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBE..
>
> Bon. Ca fait 49.6 "QUEBEC". La prochaine fois va etre la bonne!
>
> Fais tes bagages!


Bien DIT ! Qu'il s'en retourne dans leur bô cacanadéa.

...salopards de "partitionnist"
--
Luc @ Anjou,
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/18/97
to

Un jour une Kriss de plotte sale écrivait:
Karen Gordon wrote:

[tas de marde coupé]

Granger Marc

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Peter S. Saly (Pe...@saly.com) wrote:
: Granger Marc <gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA> wrote in article >
:
:
:

Mmmoui, c'est a peu pres ca!


Have a nice day!



Granger Marc

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Le Guerrier Louis-Luc (legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA) wrote:
: gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) writes:
:
: >Un autre qui prend ses reves pour des realites... t'as jamais vu les
: >sondages a ce sujet, n'est-ce pas? Une chance, parce que sinon, ton
: >enthousiasme en prendrait un maudit coup!
: Our rights as citizens override any poll.

I n'en would pas be so sur... On verra well quand it will arriver


:
:
: >Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to
: >my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)

: No, I'll take off QUEBEC instead... Get into your barn in St-Jean ans shut up!
:

QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBE..


Bon. Ca fait 49.6 "QUEBEC". La prochaine fois va etre la bonne!

Fais tes bagages!


Qu'on se le dise!

Marc Granger, QUEBEC

Darryl Levine

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) wrote:


>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBE..

(1) Kinda reminds me of Jack Nicholson at his typerwriter at the end
of the Shining

>Bon. Ca fait 49.6 "QUEBEC". La prochaine fois va etre la bonne!

(2) Funny, that's what you said the last time.

Not only are separatists perennial losers, but they are also sore
losers. It's always someone else's fault. And it's never over until
they say it's over.

Like some pathetic teenage kid who refuses to accept that some girl
doesn't like him, separatists continue to bug her until she finally
can't take it anymore and submits. But by then the boy has been
chasing her for so long that he can't even remember what the point
was. Everyone else has moved on and he is still fixated, not with the
girl, but with the idea of the girl.

And you know that once he gets her all his fantasies of how great
things will be will vanish once he gets her. Instead he will have to
look for excuses for why its not like he imagined. He'll blame
everyone else - except himself, of course. It's never his fault.

>Fais tes bagages!

Maybe he'll tell his friends to move away and leave him alone with his
girl. Maybe he'll force them out.

.....................
Darryl Levine
Montreal, Qc.,
Canada
.....................


Le Guerrier Louis-Luc

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) writes:

>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBE..

>Bon. Ca fait 49.6 "QUEBEC". La prochaine fois va etre la bonne!

>Fais tes bagages!
Voyez-vous ca? C'est ca un separatiste borne... Qu'on dise n'importe quoi,
il va toujours avoir sa maudite replique. Tu vois pas que t'es malade?
J'ai de la peine de te voir si gravement atteint. Je savais pas que
c'etait rendu a ce point-la.

On a QUEBEC a 100% en fait de territoire et de population. Si CANADA te fatigue,
oublie-le et vis ta vie tout simplement.

Si CANADA te fatigue a un point de ne plus dormir la nuit, fait ta valise. Il
y a plein d'autres pays et peut-etre que un avex plus de guerre et de problemes
va te satisfaire?

>Qu'on se le dise!

QUEBEC = 100%
QUEBEC = 100%
QUEBEC = 100%!!!
>Marc Granger, QUEBEC

(pssst. canada = 100% aussi, chhhttt!)

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to
Peter S. Saly wrote:
>
> Granger Marc <gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA> wrote in article >
> >
> >
> > Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to
> > my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)
> >
>
> you mean like this ?
>
> Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec, CANADA


No !
Like that:

badflag.gif

Sue

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]


hehheee tres drole...bon je retourne sur mon IRC

Granger Marc

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Distribution: world

Le Guerrier Louis-Luc (legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA) wrote:

: gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) writes:
:
: >QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
: >QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
: >QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
: >QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
: >QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBE..
:
:
: >Bon. Ca fait 49.6 "QUEBEC". La prochaine fois va etre la bonne!
:
: >Fais tes bagages!
: Voyez-vous ca? C'est ca un separatiste borne... Qu'on dise n'importe quoi,
: il va toujours avoir sa maudite replique. Tu vois pas que t'es malade?

Tsk...tsk! Je me sens tres bien merci! Tu l'as dit toi meme: que l'on dise
n'importe quoi, je vais toujours avoir ma maudite replique. T'as raison,
je reponds a ceux qui disent n'importe quoi; je ne reponds pratiquement
qu'a ceux qui disent n'importe quoi, et j'aime repondre a ceux qui disent
n'importe quoi pour se faire voir. Or tu es l'un de ceux-la! Au meme titre
que la Trinite des Clowns, Guy Bertrand, Jean-Louis Roux et Howard
Galgamorve...Tu me fais penser a Elvis Gratton! (quoique cultive comme tu
sembles l'etre, tu ne dois pas connaitre ca!)


Une question comme ca: que dirais-tu si certaines regions majoritairement
francophones du ROC decidaient de s'annexer a un Quebec souverain? Ou
encore, si apres une nouvelle defaite referendaire, toutes les regions du
Quebec ayant vote OUI decidaient de se separer du Canada?

Ce petit jeu de charcutage peut se jouer a plusieurs...

Marc Granger, QUEBEC


Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Le Guerrier Louis-Luc wrote:

> As a francophone of Montreal, I should say that's a great idea,

Traduction:
==========
Étant un vendu, je trouve que votre idée est excellente. C'est le
dernier
effort désespéré d'un constipé.

> I want to
> get rid of the separatist threats and live peacefully in my country.

Traduction:
==========
Je chie dans mes culottes rien qu'à penser qu'un jour je devrai
m'expatrier
à Moronto.

> Whether
> my province is Quebec (ideally), Ontario, or a federal territory, that doesn't
> really matter as long as I continue to be part of Canada.

Traduction:
==========
Je n'ai pas d'identité ! Un vrai colon, c'est moi. Vive le canadéa !
Vive Jean crétin
et tous les vendus.

> If separatist want
> a partition (I said partition), they'll get one: we'll leave Quebec city
> and the eastern for them, the Natives will certainly keep the northern Quebec
> in Canada, and we, in the West of Quebec, will keep our land in Canada anyway.


Traduction:
==========
Je suis tombé dans le panneau et j'achète les âneries prônées par
ALLIANCE KWAYBEK,
kek cheufs "Ô touch tone", Marc Lalonde, Con-rad Black pis toutes les
aut' troud'culs
Kapitalisss dominateurs/usurpateurs.



> Please wherever you are in Canada, think about us and show your endeavour to
> save our Quebec province from corruption.

Traduction:
==========
Apel à Dieu, Raël, Abraham, Allah, Youppi, Badaboum, Soeur Angèle, Teddy
bear munum munum,
Jingle Bell Létourneau, Magic Tom, Guy Bertrannnnde de me protéger
contre les vilains séparatissssss.



> Salutations à tous les Canadiens Français

Traduction:
==========
Say hello to the *dead duck* for me. How is your mother ?

> Louis-Luc Le Guerrier

Keep your helmet on. Met ton casse de bain, t'es ben correct.

Patrick Lepine

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Luc Richard wrote:
>
> Granger Marc wrote:
>
> [légère coupure , faute de budget]
>
> > UEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBE..
> >
> > Bon. Ca fait 49.6 "QUEBEC". La prochaine fois va etre la bonne!
> >
> > Fais tes bagages!
>
> Bien DIT ! Qu'il s'en retourne dans leur bô cacanadéa.
>
> ...salopards de "partitionnist"
> --
> Luc @ Anjou,
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
> Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

HAHA Tu va perdre le Nord Du Quebec NyahNyah.
Apres ca tout peut arriver.

Patrick Lepine

Patrick Lepine

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Daniel Robichaud wrote:
>
> Luc Richard <lra...@login.net> wrote in article
> <330B35...@login.net>...

>
> > Traduction:
> > ==========
> > Étant un vendu, je trouve que votre idée est excellente. C'est le
> > dernier
> > effort désespéré d'un constipé.
> >
>
> Quand tu parle de " étant un VENDU", parle tu de quelqu'un qui n'a pas
> droit à son opinion ??????????
>
> Si possible j'aimerais une réponse "intelligente" ….. bonne chance ;o)
>
> A+
> Daniel

Pourquoi demander l'impossible de Luc?

Patrick Lepine

Spiderman

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

In article <5ebdvl$k...@freenet-news.carleton.ca>,
ar...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Karen Gordon) wrote:

> This controversial concept gained new repectability a year ago when it was
> mentioned by federal intergovernmental Affairs Minister Stephane Dion. It's
> the seeking of a way - in the event of separation - to keep in Canada THE
> PARTS OF QUEBEC that wish to remain.

Actually babe, that idea gained acceptance in the early 20's when Ireland
was partitioned. Considering how wildly successful this has proven,
perhaps one might ask if "le jeu en vaut la chandelle".

> Another reason to speak up is that it may help Canada retain the city of
> MONTREAL. Housefather asserts that, without a separatist threat and with
> its bilingual workforce, Montreal has the potential to be a thriving, vibrant
> part of the country.

And anyone who thinks that bilingualism will remain the official policy of
Canada if the rest of Quebec separates is a fool. Hence bilingualism in
Montreal will gradually disappear, followed closely by the French
language.

Of course, why should someone named Karen Gordon worry about this?

> If it means fracturing Quebec into the pieces which contain the die-hard
> separatists and those who remain heart-and-soul Canadian, so be it. This
> seems to be the only way to convince those intent on splitting the country
> that the split may be smaller than they think.....

Ms. Gordon, have you ever been to Quebec? have you ever in your life
spoken a word of French? How much of a Canadian ARE you really?

If you came here you'd find that most people can easily get around in
either of the official languages of Canada. If you'll go to practically
any city outside Quebec -- even Ottawa -- you'll find that most people can
easily get around in English only.

As a province, we're more Canadian than you are. And therein lies the
problem. We love the idea of Canada. We just can't believe how little
these ideas matter anywhere outside our province. The only thing the other
nine provinces have been successful at, no matter at what time in history
this has been, is ganging up on us. That's what happened when one of our
home grown Uncle Toms, Pierre Trudeau, rapatriated the constitution. I now
see that the call to arms has come again.

Well, the chips will fall where they may... It is an encouraging sign to
see that you have grown more honest over time. It used to be, "We love
you, Quebec". Now it's the more forthright "Piss us off and we'll gut you,
frogs!".

TAE

Greg Patterson

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Granger Marc wrote:

> Le Guerrier Louis-Luc (legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA) wrote:
> : As a francophone of Montreal, I should say that's a great idea, I want to
> : get rid of the separatist threats and live peacefully in my country. Whether


> : my province is Quebec (ideally), Ontario, or a federal territory, that doesn't

> : really matter as long as I continue to be part of Canada. If separatist want


> : a partition (I said partition), they'll get one: we'll leave Quebec city
> : and the eastern for them, the Natives will certainly keep the northern Quebec
> : in Canada, and we, in the West of Quebec, will keep our land in Canada anyway.

> :
> : Please wherever you are in Canada, think about us and show your endeavour to


> : save our Quebec province from corruption.

> :
> : Salutations à tous les Canadiens Français
> :
> : Louis-Luc Le Guerrier

Hear, Hear!

> Un autre qui prend ses reves pour des realites... t'as jamais vu les
> sondages a ce sujet, n'est-ce pas? Une chance, parce que sinon, ton
> enthousiasme en prendrait un maudit coup!

I am so fucking glad I moved to this piece of shit PROVINCE of Quebec.
I'll
sit here on my fat ass voting against you separatists left, right, and
centre
until you figure out how democracy works.

> Mark Granger, St-Jean, QUERBEC, Canada

Lucky for you, you get to hide behind your little PeeCee.

Greg Patterson

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Granger Marc wrote:

> Ce petit jeu de charcutage peut se jouer a plusieurs...
>
> Marc Granger, QUEBEC

My question for you is this: Do you know where you live? Is it QUEBEC
CITY
or is it St. Jean?

Greg Patterson,
Montreal, Ontario, Canada

Erik

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Karen Gordon wrote:
>
> Time for each and every province to speak out in support of the federalists
> in Quebec..... this from B.C.....
>
> (Vancouver Sun article of February 14/97; Barbara Yaffe - columnist):

> (article snipped)


>
> (Karen): Well, there it is. Quebec's federalists have asked for the help
> of 'other Canadians' in support for keeping them a part of this
> country.
> No way can we let them down. No way can our provincial governments not
> respond with full support.

> If it means fracturing Quebec into the pieces which contain the
> die-hard separatists and those who remain heart-and-soul Canadian, so
> be it. This seems to be the only way to convince those intent on
> splitting the country that the split may be smaller than they
> think.....
>

> You have the support of this BC native and resident Ontarian....anyone
> who sees this message and can relay it to Mr Housefather (Montreal
> lawyer) is most welcome to.
> You will not be left alone in your struggle against the Bloc's
> separatist movement. More will end up staying with us than
> leaving..... you can bet on it. And on us.
>

The problem with the partion argument is that if you accept that Quebec
has the right to separate, and that portions of Quebec then have the
right to secede from that province/country, I think you would have a hard
time arguing against, for example, the Haida nation taking the Queen
Charlotte Islands (after a successful referendum) out of BC and Canada.
Or for that matter, why couldn't some farmer on the Alberta/Montana
border decide to join the US of A, or just set up his/her own country?

Rather than spending their time posturing, the federal government needs
to have provincial secession rights enshrined in the constitution NOW.

If they can then figure out a legitimate way that parts of Quebec can
separate from that province/country without allowing places like
that rather unimportant little eastern burg of Toronto, for example, to
secede, then fine, I'm all for it!

Like, Cheers!
E.

--
e-mail: sch...@bc.sympatico.ca
___________________________________________________________
*** The ocean is the ultimate solution ***
- F. Zappa

ki...@total.net

unread,
Feb 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/19/97
to

Je désire il y avait plus de Canadiens comme Karen,vous Luc êtes un
bâtard ignorant

Luc Richard wrote:
>
> Un jour une Kriss de plotte sale écrivait:
> Karen Gordon wrote:
>
> [tas de marde coupé]

Daniel Robichaud

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

J.M. Aubry

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to


Le Guerrier Louis-Luc <legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA> wrote in article
<leguerrl....@brise.ERE.UMontreal.CA>...

> >says...


> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Time for each and every province to speak out in support of the
federalists
> >>in Quebec..... this from B.C.....
> >>
> >>(Vancouver Sun article of February 14/97; Barbara Yaffe - columnist):
> >>

> >>B.C. SUPPORT SOUGHT FOR QUEBECERS WISHING TO REMAIN IN CANADA
> >>
> ><Snip>
> >>

> >>(Karen): Well, there it is. Quebec's federalists have asked for the
help
> >>of 'other Canadians' in support for keeping them a part of this
country.
> >>No way can we let them down. No way can our provincial governments not
> >>respond with full support.
> >>If it means fracturing Quebec into the pieces which contain the
die-hard
> >>separatists and those who remain heart-and-soul Canadian, so be it.
This
> >>seems to be the only way to convince those intent on splitting the
country
> >>that the split may be smaller than they think.....
> >>
> >>You have the support of this BC native and resident Ontarian....anyone
who
> >>sees this message and can relay it to Mr Housefather (Montreal lawyer)
is
> >>most welcome to.
> >>You will not be left alone in your struggle against the Bloc's
separatist
> >>movement. More will end up staying with us than leaving..... you can
bet
> >>on it. And on us.
> >>

> >>--
>
>>==========================================================================


=
> >>
> >Karen, check her article on the 17th. It sounds like there is
> >some support for this option from at least a few B.C. politicians,
> >like the B.C. Liberal leader and the Mayor of Vancouver.
>
> >If the separatists/secessionists go ahead with another referendum
> >for the dismantling of Canada, the proposal for a partitioned
> >Outaouais region with Montreal as the capital sounds interesting,
> >as well as the possibility of making it a federally operated
> >district like Washington, D.C., as suggested by Bob Tarplett.
>
> >G.C.

> As a francophone of Montreal, I should say that's a great idea, I want to
> get rid of the separatist threats and live peacefully in my country.
Whether
> my province is Quebec (ideally), Ontario, or a federal territory, that
doesn't
> really matter as long as I continue to be part of Canada. If separatist
want
> a partition (I said partition), they'll get one: we'll leave Quebec city
> and the eastern for them, the Natives will certainly keep the northern
Quebec
> in Canada, and we, in the West of Quebec, will keep our land in Canada
anyway.
>
> Please wherever you are in Canada, think about us and show your endeavour
to
> save our Quebec province from corruption.
>
> Salutations à tous les Canadiens Français
>
> Louis-Luc Le Guerrier
>

Penses pas que s' il y a partition, que l' ouest du Québec s' annexerait a
ce
qui reste du Canada. Peut-être quelques enclaves du West Island... Mais
entre
ces enclaves et le Canada, il y aurait le Québec. Tu peux toujours
guerroyer
comme tu veux, en écrivant des niaiseries.

Between the little guettos which might be choose to partition the Québec,
and the
Canada, there will be the Québec. The life will not be easy in these
guettos like the transportation in downtown of Montréal.

Jean-Marie

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

Greg Patterson wrote:


> Greg Patterson,
> Montreal, Ontario, Canada

Tiens !
Un aut' élève doué en géographie... ;-)

Paul Rodgers

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

On 20 Feb 1997 00:59:59 GMT, "Daniel Robichaud" <aca...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:

>
>
>Luc Richard <lra...@login.net> wrote in article
><330B35...@login.net>...
>
>> Traduction:
>> ==========
>> Étant un vendu, je trouve que votre idée est excellente. C'est le
>> dernier
>> effort désespéré d'un constipé.
>>
>
>Quand tu parle de " étant un VENDU", parle tu de quelqu'un qui n'a pas
>droit à son opinion ??????????

je crois qu'un "vendu", un "chouayen" est quelqu'un qui trahi son peuple, sa
race, cela n'a rien à voir avec une opinion ou la liberté de l'exprimer!

>Si possible j'aimerais une réponse "intelligente" ….. bonne chance ;o)
>
>A+
>Daniel

Paul Rodgers
~~~~~~~~~~~~

" En 1960, tout devenait possible au Québec, même la révolution."

Pierre Elliott Trudeau
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

Daniel Robichaud wrote:
>
> Luc Richard <lra...@login.net> wrote in article
> <330B35...@login.net>...
>
> > Traduction:
> > ==========
> > Étant un vendu, je trouve que votre idée est excellente. C'est le
> > dernier
> > effort désespéré d'un constipé.
> >
>
> Quand tu parle de " étant un VENDU", parle tu de quelqu'un qui n'a pas
> droit à son opinion ??????????

Quand j'écris que ce connard de Louis-Luc Le Guerrier est un vendu,
c'est du tout réfléchit.

1) Ce type n'exprime pas une opinion, il propagande constamment.
2) Ce type n'a aucune mémoire collective mais bien sélective.
3) Il prône la *PARTITION* du kébek, ça confirme son état d'esprit
revanchard.
4) N'ayant aucune connaissance de sa provenance, il ne peut savoir où il
va.

Tant qu'à toi, ami Robichaud, fier Acadien, que diraient tes ancêtres de
te voir
aujourd'hui ?

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

Patrick Lepine wrote:


> HAHA Tu va perdre le Nord Du Quebec NyahNyah.
> Apres ca tout peut arriver.
>
> Patrick Lepine


Héhéhé...pas pire, toé t'as pardu le nord tout court ;-))))

Terry Burke

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

Spiderman wrote:
>
> In article <5ebdvl$k...@freenet-news.carleton.ca>,
> ar...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Karen Gordon) wrote:
>

>
> Ms. Gordon, have you ever been to Quebec? have you ever in your life
> spoken a word of French? How much of a Canadian ARE you really?
>
> If you came here you'd find that most people can easily get around in
> either of the official languages of Canada. If you'll go to practically
> any city outside Quebec -- even Ottawa -- you'll find that most people can

> easily get around in English only. Yeh Right!!! I have been to your province many times. The Only place
that is truly bilingual is west Quebec and Montreal. Quebec city wasn't
to bad either. But as I travelled east it became increasingly dificult to
get service in english. A motel clerk in a town I stayed in spoke no
english. In restaunts I was ignored becasue I spoke english.

> As a province, we're more Canadian than you are. And therein lies the
> problem. We love the idea of Canada. We just can't believe how little
> these ideas matter anywhere outside our province. The only thing the other
> nine provinces have been successful at, no matter at what time in history

> this has been, is ganging up on us. It is too bad that Quebec has not been honest with the rest of Canada.
Lets not forget who won the war on the plains of Abraham witch by the way
has a soccer field on it. (nice touch). Lets also discuss how Quebec is
acting as a spoiled child. That is why the attitude has changed. The rest
of us are tired of having seperation held to are throats like a kinfe.
Every time something dosen't go in Quebec's favor it's "we're going to
seperate.People are tired of it. If Quebec is so determined to seperate
then Why should I stop them. Go ahead go on your own. But lets make sure
that Quebec goes only with what it had when it joined confederation. That
area know previously as lower Canada. Oh and BTW the call to arms has
been heeded.

Jean-René Levesque

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

On 19 Feb 1997 00:13:01 GMT, gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger
Marc) wrote:

>Peter S. Saly (Pe...@saly.com) wrote:
>: Granger Marc <gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA> wrote in article >
>: >
>: >
>: > Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to
>: > my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)
>: >
>:
>: you mean like this ?
>:
>: Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec, CANADA

>:
>:
>:

>
>Mmmoui, c'est a peu pres ca!
>

Té pu content d'être canadien, Marc? ;O) Mais voyons... C'est le
plusse beau pays te toute le monde!
>
>Have a nice day!
>
>
>
>

--
Jean-René Levesque,
Responsable Général
L'Action Gauchiste
http://www.cedep.com/~jabba/jean/as.htm

Daniel Robichaud

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to


Luc Richard <lra...@login.net> wrote in article

<330C63...@login.net>...


> Daniel Robichaud wrote:
> >
> > Luc Richard <lra...@login.net> wrote in article
> > <330B35...@login.net>...
> >
> > > Traduction:
> > > ==========
> > > Étant un vendu, je trouve que votre idée est excellente. C'est le
> > > dernier
> > > effort désespéré d'un constipé.
> > >
> >
> > Quand tu parle de " étant un VENDU", parle tu de quelqu'un qui n'a pas
> > droit à son opinion ??????????
>
> Quand j'écris que ce connard de Louis-Luc Le Guerrier est un vendu,
> c'est du tout réfléchit.
>
> 1) Ce type n'exprime pas une opinion, il propagande constamment.
> 2) Ce type n'a aucune mémoire collective mais bien sélective.
> 3) Il prône la *PARTITION* du kébek, ça confirme son état d'esprit
> revanchard.
> 4) N'ayant aucune connaissance de sa provenance, il ne peut savoir où il
> va.
>

Si tu parle de "ce type" comme étant vendu , je suis une peut d'accord avec
toi (49.4 %)( bien répondu)... . L'esprit revanchard que tu mentionne au
no.3, on la voie aussi chez certains séparatistes ...

> Tant qu'à toi, ami Robichaud, fier Acadien, que diraient tes ancêtres de
> te voir aujourd'hui ?
>

Là tu me prend par les sentiments ;o)

Je suis certain que mes ancètres seraient fière de moi, autant que je suis
fière d'eux... J'ai même une page sur le "web" ( http://www.rpa.ca/acadie/
) avec une section appelé "Découvrez l'Acadie" qui leur rend hommage. J'ai
même une section ou je vais parler des acadiens hors Acadie ;o) ou si tu
veux , Les Acadiens qui habite au Québec ( à venir ).Tu serait surpris du
savoir qu'aujourd'hui il y a plus d'un million de Québecois qui sont de
descendance Acadienne ( sondage Léger-Léger), et que des noms de famille
comme Vigneau, Duplessis, et autres sont d'origine acadienne...

A+
--------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Daniel L Robichaud
Tracadie-Sheila, N.-B., Canada
eMail : aca...@nbnet.nb.ca
Page personnel : http://www.rpa.ca/acadie/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Daniel Robichaud

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to


Paul Rodgers <p.ro...@atreide.net> wrote in article
<330c14a...@news.atreide.net>...


> >Quand tu parle de " étant un VENDU", parle tu de quelqu'un qui n'a pas
> >droit à son opinion ??????????
>

> je crois qu'un "vendu", un "chouayen" est quelqu'un qui trahi son peuple,
sa
> race, cela n'a rien à voir avec une opinion ou la liberté de l'exprimer!
>
> >Si possible j'aimerais une réponse "intelligente" ….. bonne chance ;o)

j'ai demandé une réponce intéligente..... J'attend toujours....

Granger Marc

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

Greg Patterson (go...@gomer.mlink.net) wrote:
:
: Greg Patterson,
: Montreal, Ontario, Canada
^^^^^^^
--

Same question for you!

Sue

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

JFL wrote:

>
> Sue wrote:
> >
> > Luc Richard wrote:
> > >
> > > Peter S. Saly wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Granger Marc <gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA> wrote in article >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to
> > > > > my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > you mean like this ?
> > > >
> > > > Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec, CANADA
> > >
> > > No !
> > > Like that:
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > > [Image]
> >
> > hehheee tres drole...bon je retourne sur mon IRC
>
> Hey S'lut! a ten pren pa gro pour trouvé Luc draule. As-tu remarcé que
> t'écri toujour en raiponse a ses coneris? Pis que tu trouv sa draule
> presque tou le tamp? sa doi airte passe que té pas plu bryante que lui.


C'est quoi ca...cette langue la....c'est pas du malamut ca....comprends
rien.....t'est pas jaloux en plus.....commence a croire Luc moi
la....t'est vraiment bis

Patrick Lepine

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

Luc Richard wrote:

>
> Greg Patterson wrote:
>
> > Greg Patterson,
> > Montreal, Ontario, Canada
>
> Tiens !
> Un aut' élève doué en géographie... ;-)
> --
> Luc @ Anjou,
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
> Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

Not feeling very sharp today are you Luc?

Patrick Lepine
Vendu et Fier de l'etre

Patrick Lepine

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

J.M. Aubry wrote:
>
> Le Guerrier Louis-Luc <legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA> wrote in article
> <leguerrl....@brise.ERE.UMontreal.CA>...
> > cha...@jumppoint.com (G.C.) writes:
> >

Does that mean you agree that all ridings where a majority of residents
vote Non can stay Canadian?

Patrick Lepine

Granger Marc

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

Luc Richard (lra...@login.net) wrote:
: Le Guerrier Louis-Luc wrote:
:
: > As a francophone of Montreal, I should say that's a great idea,
:
: Traduction:

: ==========
: Étant un vendu, je trouve que votre idée est excellente. C'est le
: dernier
: effort désespéré d'un constipé.
:
: > I want to

: > get rid of the separatist threats and live peacefully in my country.
:
: Traduction:

: ==========
: Je chie dans mes culottes rien qu'à penser qu'un jour je devrai
: m'expatrier
: à Moronto.
:
: > Whether

: > my province is Quebec (ideally), Ontario, or a federal territory, that doesn't
: > really matter as long as I continue to be part of Canada.
:
: Traduction:

: ==========
: Je n'ai pas d'identité ! Un vrai colon, c'est moi. Vive le canadéa !
: Vive Jean crétin
: et tous les vendus.
:
: > If separatist want

: > a partition (I said partition), they'll get one: we'll leave Quebec city
: > and the eastern for them, the Natives will certainly keep the northern Quebec
: > in Canada, and we, in the West of Quebec, will keep our land in Canada anyway.
:
:
: Traduction:

: ==========
: Je suis tombé dans le panneau et j'achète les âneries prônées par
: ALLIANCE KWAYBEK,
: kek cheufs "Ô touch tone", Marc Lalonde, Con-rad Black pis toutes les
: aut' troud'culs
: Kapitalisss dominateurs/usurpateurs.
:
: > Please wherever you are in Canada, think about us and show your endeavour to

: > save our Quebec province from corruption.
:
: Traduction:

: ==========
: Apel à Dieu, Raël, Abraham, Allah, Youppi, Badaboum, Soeur Angèle, Teddy
: bear munum munum,
: Jingle Bell Létourneau, Magic Tom, Guy Bertrannnnde de me protéger
: contre les vilains séparatissssss.
:

Bien joue, Luc!

Jean-René Levesque

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to

On Thu, 20 Feb 1997 00:44:45 -0500, Luc Richard <lra...@login.net>
wrote:

>Greg Patterson wrote:
>
>
>> Greg Patterson,
>> Montreal, Ontario, Canada
>
>Tiens !
>Un aut' élève doué en géographie... ;-)
>--
>Luc @ Anjou,
>http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
>Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

T'as rien compris encore une fois, Luc... Ca, c'est son adresse dans
son Québec partitionné... ;-)

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to

Sue wrote:

> C'est quoi ca...cette langue la....c'est pas du malamut ca....comprends
> rien.....t'est pas jaloux en plus.....commence a croire Luc moi
> la....t'est vraiment bis


Allez, Sue, partons ensemble, on pourrait se louer une chaloupe, un
ti-moteur,
2 tites carabines, pis wouella ,


LA CHASSE AUX CANARDS !

Hiiiin ! Hiiiin! Hiiiin ! Hinn !
PAN ! PAN !

;-)
--
[Dans son habit de camouflage]

J.M. Aubry

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to

On 20 Feb 1997 15:32:45 GMT, Terry Burke <ter...@istar.ca> wrote:

>>

>
>>
>> Ms. Gordon, have you ever been to Quebec? have you ever in your life
>> spoken a word of French? How much of a Canadian ARE you really?
>>
>> If you came here you'd find that most people can easily get around in
>> either of the official languages of Canada. If you'll go to practically
>> any city outside Quebec -- even Ottawa -- you'll find that most people can
>> easily get around in English only. Yeh Right!!! I have been to your province many times. The Only place
>that is truly bilingual is west Quebec and Montreal. Quebec city wasn't
>to bad either. But as I travelled east it became increasingly dificult to
>get service in english. A motel clerk in a town I stayed in spoke no
>english. In restaunts I was ignored becasue I spoke english.

Do you think that it will be easy to get service in french in
Cornwall ont. Ottawa ont. Kirkland lake ont. etc. These cities are
located near Québec, and have a lot of francophones citizens, but
it is even very difficult to get service in French.
You told us a strange story, because a lot of american tourists
visit Gaspésie and the east part of Québec since many decades

Do you realize that you don' t speak French. When people
visit Italy, it seems probable that few words of Italian will
be indispensable.


>
>> As a province, we're more Canadian than you are. And therein lies the
>> problem. We love the idea of Canada. We just can't believe how little
>> these ideas matter anywhere outside our province. The only thing the other
>> nine provinces have been successful at, no matter at what time in history
>> this has been, is ganging up on us. It is too bad that Quebec has not been honest with the rest of Canada.
>Lets not forget who won the war on the plains of Abraham witch by the way
>has a soccer field on it. (nice touch). Lets also discuss how Quebec is
>acting as a spoiled child. That is why the attitude has changed. The rest
>of us are tired of having seperation held to are throats like a kinfe.
>Every time something dosen't go in Quebec's favor it's "we're going to
>seperate.People are tired of it. If Quebec is so determined to seperate
>then Why should I stop them. Go ahead go on your own. But lets make sure
>that Quebec goes only with what it had when it joined confederation. That
>area know previously as lower Canada. Oh and BTW the call to arms has
>been heeded.


Well, my ancestors didn't invite Wolfe in plains of Abraham
May be your problem is that the English army of 1760 didn' t
kill all of my ancestors. Like irish, palestinians...it' s normal
for the people of Québec to get souveraineté.

What' s a perfect Canadian for you ?
I' m sure that your definition is not the same of us.

It' s not very important for us that you so tired ( snif)
to listen Québec struggling with another canadian problem.

The partition of Québec is hypothetic, and realize that the
no vote is not a yes for the partition. All the French Quebecois, 80%
of population of Québec will not accept this hypothetic partition.

Jean-Marie


Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to

Jean-René Levesque wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Feb 1997 00:44:45 -0500, Luc Richard <lra...@login.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Greg Patterson wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Greg Patterson,
> >> Montreal, Ontario, Canada
> >
> >Tiens !
> >Un aut' élève doué en géographie... ;-)
>
>
> T'as rien compris encore une fois, Luc... Ca, c'est son adresse dans
> son Québec partitionné... ;-)


Dans son Québec quoi ? Comment il dit le môssieu ? perdon ? Perdon ???
Je lui souhaite de faire provision de beaucoup de broche pour qu'il
puisse
ficeller solidement sa tuque sur sa boîte à poux.

IL peut toujours rêver, c'est gratos !

en malamuth: *Attaches ta tuque avec d'la broche*
--

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to

JFL wrote:


> Hey S'lut! a ten pren pa gro pour trouvé Luc draule. As-tu remarcé que
> t'écri toujour en raiponse a ses coneris? Pis que tu trouv sa draule
> presque tou le tamp? sa doi airte passe que té pas plu bryante que lui.


mais...mais... c'est qu'il souffre d'être seul...
pôv canetou ;-)

C'est long, hein...les prairies, comme ça...tous les matins en mangeant
ses céréales et voir des silos de grains à perte de vue !

Tu devrais revenir au KWAYBEK, avec les inondations que l'on prévoit,
il va y avoir des milliers, peut-être des millions d'étangs où tu
pourrais
patauger mollo-mollo.

;-)
COIN-COIN.

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to

Daniel Robichaud wrote:

> Là tu me prend par les sentiments ;o)
>
> Je suis certain que mes ancètres seraient fière de moi, autant que je suis
> fière d'eux... J'ai même une page sur le "web" ( http://www.rpa.ca/acadie/
> ) avec une section appelé "Découvrez l'Acadie" qui leur rend hommage. J'ai
> même une section ou je vais parler des acadiens hors Acadie ;o) ou si tu
> veux , Les Acadiens qui habite au Québec ( à venir ).Tu serait surpris du
> savoir qu'aujourd'hui il y a plus d'un million de Québecois qui sont de
> descendance Acadienne ( sondage Léger-Léger), et que des noms de famille
> comme Vigneau, Duplessis, et autres sont d'origine acadienne...
>
> A+


RICHARD, Michel, n 1630 [R1671], laboureur en 1671
RICHARD, René (Michel & Madeleine BLANCHARD) [R1671+R1686], d avant
29-05-1700
RICHARD, Alexandre, n 1667 [R1699], n 1663 [R1701] (Michel & Madeleine
BLANCHARD) [R1686+R1699]
RICHARD, Martin, n 1665 [R1698], n 1664 [R1699] [R1714] (Michel &
Madeleine BLANCHARD) [R1686+R1698]

Probablement une couple de mes ancêtres.

Beau site. Lâches pas la patate ! ;-)

Wookie

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to

Luc Richard wrote:
>
> Greg Patterson wrote:
>
> > Greg Patterson,
> > Montreal, Ontario, Canada
>
> Tiens !
> Un aut' élève doué en géographie... ;-)

> --
> Luc @ Anjou,
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
> Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

Only someone who has never travelled outside of the province of Quebec
would believe that there is only one Montreal in Canada or for that
matter in North America. There are to the best of my knowledge 5
Montreals in North America... but then again that's just anglo geography
that takes into account that the universe does not begin and end at the
borders of Quebec.

Wookie

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to

Wookie wrote:
>
>
> Only someone who has never travelled outside of the province of Quebec
> would believe that there is only one Montreal in Canada or for that
> matter in North America. There are to the best of my knowledge 5
> Montreals in North America... but then again that's just anglo geography
> that takes into account that the universe does not begin and end at the
> borders of Quebec.

Whoops, colour me red. I can only come up with four Montreals, can
anyone else help?

Montreal, Quebec, Canada,
Montreal, Ontario, Canada,
Montreal Lake, Saskatchewan, Canada,
Montreal, Wisconsin, USA

I thought there was another one --- guess I'm wrong or my Atlas is out
of date.

Wookie

Granger Marc

unread,
Feb 22, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/22/97
to

Terry Burke (ter...@istar.ca) wrote:
: Lets not forget who won the war on the plains of Abraham witch by the way


Terry, je pense que ton disque saute...achete-toi donc un lecteur de CD!

Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC

Granger Marc

unread,
Feb 22, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/22/97
to

Luc Richard (lra...@login.net) wrote:
:
: Quand j'écris que ce connard de Louis-Luc Le Guerrier est un vendu,

: c'est du tout réfléchit.
:
: 1) Ce type n'exprime pas une opinion, il propagande constamment.
: 2) Ce type n'a aucune mémoire collective mais bien sélective.
: 3) Il prône la *PARTITION* du kébek, ça confirme son état d'esprit
: revanchard.
: 4) N'ayant aucune connaissance de sa provenance, il ne peut savoir où il
: va.


Luc, si tu savais ce qui se dit sur ce gars a l'universite, tu ne serais
peut-etre pas aussi dur envers lui. Les gars de son departement pensent
qu'il a un p'tit probleme dans son p'tit coco.... C'est peut-etre pas
entierement de sa faute s'il est aussi con...


Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC


"Seigneur, pardonnez-lui car il ne sait pas ce qu'il dit..."

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 22, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/22/97
to

Wookie wrote:


> I thought there was another one --- guess I'm wrong or my Atlas is out
> of date.
>
> Wookie

or simply,
Maybe only YOU is outdate ;-)

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 22, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/22/97
to

Patrick Lepine wrote:

> Not feeling very sharp today are you Luc?
>
> Patrick Lepine
> Vendu et Fier de l'etre

...pas b'zoin de l'écrire, tout le monde le saît ;-)

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/23/97
to

Arthur D. Mira wrote:

> Mais ce n'est pas ne pas inquiéter. Je prendrai bon soin de lui.
>
> Art (Je sais assez de français sembler ridicule) Mira
> admiral @ escape.ca

Tu vois bien, mon caneton Lacerte, que tu es entre bonnes mains ;-)

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/23/97
to

Granger Marc wrote:

> Luc, si tu savais ce qui se dit sur ce gars a l'universite, tu ne serais
> peut-etre pas aussi dur envers lui. Les gars de son departement pensent
> qu'il a un p'tit probleme dans son p'tit coco.... C'est peut-etre pas
> entierement de sa faute s'il est aussi con...
>
> Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC
>
> "Seigneur, pardonnez-lui car il ne sait pas ce qu'il dit..."


Ooops, scuse, habituellement je suis charitable envers les handicapés
mentaux.

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 24, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/24/97
to

ki...@total.net wrote:
>
> Je désire il y avait plus de Canadiens comme Karen,vous Luc êtes un
> bâtard ignorant

Merci, monsieur Galgamorve.

Wookie

unread,
Feb 24, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/24/97
to

Luc Richard wrote:
>
> Wookie wrote:
>
>
> > I thought there was another one --- guess I'm wrong or my Atlas is out
> > of date.
> >
> > Wookie
>
> or simply,
> Maybe only YOU is outdate ;-)
> --
> Luc @ Anjou,
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
> Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

I've heard snappier comebacks from a bowl of rice krispies.
--
wookie
Small minds only reference their own times.
http://www.axess.com/users/wookie

Paul Rodgers

unread,
Feb 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/25/97
to

On Mon, 24 Feb 1997 10:33:17 -0500, Luc Richard <lra...@login.net> wrote:

>ki...@total.net wrote:
>>
>> Je désire il y avait plus de Canadiens comme Karen,vous Luc êtes un
>> bâtard ignorant
>
>Merci, monsieur Galgamorve.

Galgamorve? Pas le futur député indépendant..."bâtard d'indépendantiste"
de Town of Mount Royal? La crèche du traître Trudeau!

Les good quebekers de Town of Mount Royal, effarouchés par sa venu, vont-ils
demander que le nom de la circonscription soit changé pour celui de....
Lionel Groulx? :-))

>--
>Luc @ Anjou,
>http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
>Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

Paul Rodgers
~~~~~~~~~~~~

" Lionel Groulx, c'est le George Washington du Québec moderne,
et le Québec souverain devra lui rendre cet hommage."

David ROME
Archiviste, Congrès Juif canadien
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/25/97
to

Wookie wrote:
>
> I've heard snappier comebacks from a bowl of rice krispies.


Still lucky that they are talking to you !

Wookie

unread,
Feb 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/25/97
to

> Still lucky that they are talking to you !
>
> --
> Luc @ Anjou,
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
> Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

Nothing like a little ad hominim attack when wit fails.

Luc Richard

unread,
Feb 27, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/27/97
to

JFL wrote:
>
> Oui, et c'est par un aute imbécile de ton espèce, plus vicieux
> peut-être... Il écrit le français à peu près comme toi: dis-moi donc,
> marmiton des chefs Boyar-Dee, as-tu compris qqchose à ce qu'il a écrit?
> (puisque son français est de ton niveau, c'est pour ça que je le demande
> à toi). À date, quelques personnes m'ont envoyé des E-mails pour me dire
> qu'ils comprenaient rien. Moi le premier.
> Après ça, ce Art Mira rit de mon anglais...

Tel que son nom le designe (ce "ART" "MIRA")
qui veut dire de l'art, comme de l'art, pas de l'or ou bedon de l'aure
ou bedon de Carole Laure.

Bref, c'est comme dans ART, tsé veux dire, de l'art, comme dans Artiste.

Pis MIRA, en espagnol, ça veut dire "regarder"...

fâ que boutte à boutte, ça veut tout simplement dire
REGARDER L'ART = ART MIRA
wouella...
Kapiche ?

Si tu veux d'autres informations (encore plus pertinentes)
j'entre en contact avec un medium après minuit.

coin-coin

J.W.

unread,
Feb 28, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/28/97
to

gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) wrote:

>Le Guerrier Louis-Luc (legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA) wrote:
>: As a francophone of Montreal, I should say that's a great idea, I want to
>: get rid of the separatist threats and live peacefully in my country. Whether


>: my province is Quebec (ideally), Ontario, or a federal territory, that doesn't

>: really matter as long as I continue to be part of Canada. If separatist want


>: a partition (I said partition), they'll get one: we'll leave Quebec city
>: and the eastern for them, the Natives will certainly keep the northern Quebec
>: in Canada, and we, in the West of Quebec, will keep our land in Canada anyway.
>:

>: Please wherever you are in Canada, think about us and show your endeavour to
>: save our Quebec province from corruption.
>:

>: Salutations à tous les Canadiens Français
>:
>: Louis-Luc Le Guerrier

>--

>Un autre qui prend ses reves pour des realites... t'as jamais vu les
>sondages a ce sujet, n'est-ce pas? Une chance, parce que sinon, ton
>enthousiasme en prendrait un maudit coup!

Au contraire M. Separatist ! All the polls show that the support for
partition is not only strong among Anglo and Allophones in Quebec ,
but also among Francophones because it is the ONLY logical ,
democratic and legal result of either a proper democratic vote on
separation , or a UDI by the PQ .

>Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec , C A N A D A !!!!!!
spyder


J.W.

unread,
Feb 28, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/28/97
to

gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) wrote:

>Le Guerrier Louis-Luc (legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA) wrote:

>: gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) writes:
>:
>: >Un autre qui prend ses reves pour des realites... t'as jamais vu les


>: >sondages a ce sujet, n'est-ce pas? Une chance, parce que sinon, ton
>: >enthousiasme en prendrait un maudit coup!

>: Our rights as citizens override any poll.

>I n'en would pas be so sur... On verra well quand it will arriver


>:
>:
>: >Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to


>: >my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)

>: No, I'll take off QUEBEC instead... Get into your barn in St-Jean ans shut up!
>:

>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC
>QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBEC QUEBE..


>Bon. Ca fait 49.6 "QUEBEC". La prochaine fois va etre la bonne!

If you are referring to the results of the last referendum , then may
I remind you that the results are NOT YET COMPLETELY OFFICIAL ! Only
80 voter boxes were opened and fraud was discovered ; but ALL the
boxes should and will be opened ! Here's why .
While unofficially , less than 2% separated the NO from the YES votes
, the PQ did not ask for a recount ! In light of the fact that the
Separatists were ready to declare independence unilaterally by a
margin of ONLY 1 VOTE , this is highly suspicious ! And Pierre F.
Cote , himself a Separatist , just added fuel to the fire ! You can
bet credits to navy beans that such a potentially massive voter fraud
and insult to democracy will be brought up before the next referendum
!
>Fais tes bagages!

Oui , pour vous et vos con-conspirateurs . Foutez le camp !

>Qu'on se le dise!

>Marc Granger, Quebec , CANADA !!!!!!
spyder


Erik

unread,
Feb 28, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/28/97
to

dkenter...@cadvision.com wrote:
>
> >Au contraire M. Separatist ! All the polls show that the support for
> >partition is not only strong among Anglo and Allophones in Quebec ,
> >but also among Francophones because it is the ONLY logical ,
> >democratic and legal result of either a proper democratic vote on
> >separation , or a UDI by the PQ .
>
> >>Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec , C A N A D A !!!!!!
> >spyder
>
> just hurry up and seperate
>
> we all will be better off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Another posting from the Mobile Home Owners (Alberta Div.) faction of
the Happie Frootcake Brigade.

E.
--
e-mail (non-commercial) welcome at: sch...@bc.sympatico.ca
___________________________________________________________
** People that are really very weird can get into sensitive
positions and have a tremendous impact on history **
- former US VP Dan Quayle

J.W.

unread,
Feb 28, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/28/97
to

Erik <lo...@downbelow.ca> wrote:

>Karen Gordon wrote:
>>
>> Time for each and every province to speak out in support of the federalists
>> in Quebec..... this from B.C.....
>>
>> (Vancouver Sun article of February 14/97; Barbara Yaffe - columnist):

>> (article snipped)


>>
>> (Karen): Well, there it is. Quebec's federalists have asked for the help
>> of 'other Canadians' in support for keeping them a part of this
>> country.
>> No way can we let them down. No way can our provincial governments not
>> respond with full support.
>> If it means fracturing Quebec into the pieces which contain the
>> die-hard separatists and those who remain heart-and-soul Canadian, so
>> be it. This seems to be the only way to convince those intent on
>> splitting the country that the split may be smaller than they
>> think.....
>>
>> You have the support of this BC native and resident Ontarian....anyone
>> who sees this message and can relay it to Mr Housefather (Montreal
>> lawyer) is most welcome to.
>> You will not be left alone in your struggle against the Bloc's
>> separatist movement. More will end up staying with us than
>> leaving..... you can bet on it. And on us.
>>

>The problem with the partion argument is that if you accept that Quebec
>has the right to separate, and that portions of Quebec then have the
>right to secede from that province/country, I think you would have a hard
>time arguing against, for example, the Haida nation taking the Queen
>Charlotte Islands (after a successful referendum) out of BC and Canada.
>Or for that matter, why couldn't some farmer on the Alberta/Montana
>border decide to join the US of A, or just set up his/her own country?

That is why most countries FORBID any separatist movement . Once you
allow one part to separate , you open a pandora's box where the
resulting new political entities have constantly fluctuating borders .
It becomes impossible to run a country that way !

>Rather than spending their time posturing, the federal government needs
>to have provincial secession rights enshrined in the constitution NOW.

Absolutely not ! Obviously , what should be enshrined in the
constitution is the INDIVISIBILITY of Canada ! The other possibility
reflects the 7/89 constitutions worldwide which permit secession , but
ONLY under the auspices of the Federal government !

>If they can then figure out a legitimate way that parts of Quebec can
>separate from that province/country without allowing places like
>that rather unimportant little eastern burg of Toronto, for example, to
>secede, then fine, I'm all for it!

>Like, Cheers!
>E.

spyder
>e-mail: sch...@bc.sympatico.ca
>___________________________________________________________
>*** The ocean is the ultimate solution ***
> - F. Zappa

dkenter...@cadvision.com

unread,
Mar 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/1/97
to

spy...@infobahnos.com (J.W.) wrote:

>gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) wrote:

>>Le Guerrier Louis-Luc (legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA) wrote:

>>: As a francophone of Montreal, I should say that's a great idea, I want to
>>: get rid of the separatist threats and live peacefully in my country. Whether
>>: my province is Quebec (ideally), Ontario, or a federal territory, that doesn't
>>: really matter as long as I continue to be part of Canada. If separatist want
>>: a partition (I said partition), they'll get one: we'll leave Quebec city
>>: and the eastern for them, the Natives will certainly keep the northern Quebec
>>: in Canada, and we, in the West of Quebec, will keep our land in Canada anyway.
>>:
>>: Please wherever you are in Canada, think about us and show your endeavour to
>>: save our Quebec province from corruption.
>>:
>>: Salutations à tous les Canadiens Français
>>:
>>: Louis-Luc Le Guerrier

>>--

>>Un autre qui prend ses reves pour des realites... t'as jamais vu les


>>sondages a ce sujet, n'est-ce pas? Une chance, parce que sinon, ton
>>enthousiasme en prendrait un maudit coup!

> Au contraire M. Separatist ! All the polls show that the support for

Luc Richard

unread,
Mar 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/1/97
to

MANGEZ D'LA MARDE BANDE D'USURPATEURS-COLONISATEURS
ALAN FOCK PIS TA GANG DE BANDIT
TES BÔ JUDGES D'LA COUR SUPRÊME
STEPHEN *MILOSEVIC* DION
HOWIE GALGAMORVE
KIT * IKEA* ANDERSON
TOUTOUNE FRANCIS
CON-RAD *LA CLAQUE* BACK
BOZO BERTRAND

NOUS VAINCRONS !

Granger Marc

unread,
Mar 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/1/97
to

J.W. (spy...@infobahnos.com) wrote:
: gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) wrote:
:
: >Le Guerrier Louis-Luc (legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA) wrote:
: >: As a francophone of Montreal, I should say that's a great idea, I want to
: >: get rid of the separatist threats and live peacefully in my country. Whether
: >: my province is Quebec (ideally), Ontario, or a federal territory, that doesn't
: >: really matter as long as I continue to be part of Canada. If separatist want
: >: a partition (I said partition), they'll get one: we'll leave Quebec city
: >: and the eastern for them, the Natives will certainly keep the northern Quebec
: >: in Canada, and we, in the West of Quebec, will keep our land in Canada anyway.
: >:
: >: Please wherever you are in Canada, think about us and show your endeavour to
: >: save our Quebec province from corruption.
: >:
: >: Salutations à tous les Canadiens Français
: >:
: >: Louis-Luc Le Guerrier
:
: >--
:
: >Un autre qui prend ses reves pour des realites... t'as jamais vu les
: >sondages a ce sujet, n'est-ce pas? Une chance, parce que sinon, ton
: >enthousiasme en prendrait un maudit coup!
:
: Au contraire M. Separatist ! All the polls show that the support for
: partition is not only strong among Anglo and Allophones in Quebec ,
: but also among Francophones because it is the ONLY logical ,
: democratic and legal result of either a proper democratic vote on
: separation , or a UDI by the PQ .
:

Tes sources? Financial Post? Toronto Sun? Planet Mars Times?


: >Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec , C A N A D A !!!!!!
: spyder
:

--

BLA BLA BLA...Again! Paroles de Canadian frustre...Se sent oblige
d'afficher son mot jouissif partout, parce qu'il sait qu'il ne pourra plus
le faire dans pas grand temps...


Marc Granger, QUEBEC

Peter S. Saly

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to


Luc Richard wrote in article
>
> <snip de grossieres betisses et mechancetes>


> --
> Luc @ Anjou,
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
> Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?
>

Apparament le Nescafe etait trop fort pour Luc Ce matin...

Le Guerrier Louis-Luc

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) writes:

L'Universite du Quebec A Hull.


Jean-René Levesque

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

On 18 Feb 97 21:39:52 GMT, legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Le Guerrier
Louis-Luc) wrote:

>gran...@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA (Granger Marc) writes:
>
>>Un autre qui prend ses reves pour des realites... t'as jamais vu les
>>sondages a ce sujet, n'est-ce pas? Une chance, parce que sinon, ton
>>enthousiasme en prendrait un maudit coup!

>Our rights as citizens override any poll.
>
>

>>Marc Granger, St-Jean, QUEBEC (and don't add the fucking word "Canada" to
>>my signature, as you often do it, c'est-y clair?)
>No, I'll take off QUEBEC instead... Get into your barn in St-Jean ans shut up!
>

Tu me fais peur quand tu es fâché, Louis-Luc... C'est tu toi qui va
prendre les armes pour nous empêcher de nous séparer? Si oui, on est
vraiment fait... ;-)
--
Jean-René Levesque,
Responsable Général
L'Action Gauchiste
http://www.cedep.com/~jabba/jean/as.htm

Jean-René Levesque

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

On Sat, 01 Mar 1997 03:13:57 -0500, Luc Richard <lra...@login.net>
wrote:

>MANGEZ D'LA MARDE BANDE D'USURPATEURS-COLONISATEURS


>ALAN FOCK PIS TA GANG DE BANDIT
>TES BÔ JUDGES D'LA COUR SUPRÊME
>STEPHEN *MILOSEVIC* DION
>HOWIE GALGAMORVE
>KIT * IKEA* ANDERSON
>TOUTOUNE FRANCIS
>CON-RAD *LA CLAQUE* BACK
>BOZO BERTRAND

Sacrament Luc..
T'as oublié Pet Trou-d'eau,
et Chi-là Copps! ;-)
>
>NOUS VAINCRONS !


>--
>Luc @ Anjou,
>http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lucanjou/homepage.htm
>Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

--

gilbert germain

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

Luc Richard wrote:
>
> MANGEZ D'LA MARDE BANDE D'USURPATEURS-COLONISATEURS

TU DEVRAS MANGER LA TIENNE POUR COMMENCER!
VIVA LA PARTITIONE

dkenter...@cadvision.com

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

Erik <lo...@downbelow.ca> wrote:

>dkenter...@cadvision.com wrote:
>>
>> >Au contraire M. Separatist ! All the polls show that the support for
>> >partition is not only strong among Anglo and Allophones in Quebec ,
>> >but also among Francophones because it is the ONLY logical ,
>> >democratic and legal result of either a proper democratic vote on
>> >separation , or a UDI by the PQ .
>>

>> >>Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec , C A N A D A !!!!!!
>> >spyder
>>

>> just hurry up and seperate
>>
>> we all will be better off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>Another posting from the Mobile Home Owners (Alberta Div.) faction of
>the Happie Frootcake Brigade.

>E.
>--
>e-mail (non-commercial) welcome at: sch...@bc.sympatico.ca
>___________________________________________________________
>** People that are really very weird can get into sensitive
> positions and have a tremendous impact on history **
> - former US VP Dan Quayle

im serious
we should take a vote to see if WE want the frenchies
but this wont happen. if it did the french ies would be toast.

Paul Rodgers

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

"Countries" to mean Esthablishment who profits from the territory (other's
territory) at the expense of others!


FORBID any separatist movement . Once you
>allow one part to separate , you open a pandora's box where the
>resulting new political entities have constantly fluctuating borders .
>It becomes impossible to run a country that way !
>
>>Rather than spending their time posturing, the federal government needs
>>to have provincial secession rights enshrined in the constitution NOW.
>
> Absolutely not ! Obviously , what should be enshrined in the
>constitution is the INDIVISIBILITY of Canada ! The other possibility
>reflects the 7/89 constitutions worldwide which permit secession , but
>ONLY under the auspices of the Federal government !
>
>>If they can then figure out a legitimate way that parts of Quebec can
>>separate from that province/country without allowing places like
>>that rather unimportant little eastern burg of Toronto, for example, to
>>secede, then fine, I'm all for it!
>
>>Like, Cheers!
>>E.
>
>spyder
>>e-mail: sch...@bc.sympatico.ca
>>___________________________________________________________
>>*** The ocean is the ultimate solution ***
>> - F. Zappa
>
>

Paul Rodgers
~~~~~~~~~~~~

" Car, si la contestation sans démocratie est dangéreuse,
la démocratie sans contestation, elle, est une imposture."

Pierre Vallières
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Granger Marc

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

Distribution:

gilbert germain (ger...@abacom.com) wrote:
:
: TU DEVRAS MANGER LA TIENNE POUR COMMENCER!
: VIVA LA PARTITIONE

Cretin!


Matt Cundill

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

Maybe Luc dislikes partitionists because it will expose his weakness in
simple techniques like "connect the dots".

When you were a child, did you colour within the lines?


>Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

Yes, but I would advise you not too...

----------------

Matt (Mauler) Cundill *Acadia Alumni '92
Music Director *LCC Alumni '87
100.3 FM The Bear *Bring Back Stubbies
Edmonton, Alberta *Planet Earth

Visit the Bear's Web Cave: http://www.theBearRocks.com

Paul Rodgers

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

On 2 Mar 97 01:31:22 GMT, legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Le Guerrier Louis-Lu


(coupé)


>>Tes sources? Financial Post? Toronto Sun? Planet Mars Times?
>
>L'Universite du Quebec A Hull.

Le dernier sondage d'un professeur de l'Université du Québec à Hull ne supporte
pas le maquillage que lui a servi The Southam Press.

Cette source est vérifiable au site : http://www.ledroit.com/
Cliquez sur "Affaires publiques" du cadran de gauche, ensuite choissisez
"troisième étape", qui vous menera aux résultats que vous mentionnez.

À la question: " Si le Québec devenait indépendant, préféreriez-vous que la
région de l'Outaouais québécois:

A) ...fasse partie du Québec 41 %
B) ...ne fasse pas partie du Québec 59 %

Ps: En se rappelant que le NON de 1995 se situa à 73%. Un vote pour le NON ne
représente pas un vote pour la partition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1) Si la région ne fait plus partie du Québec, elle devrait alors (répartition
des 59 % ci-dessus)

a) S'annexer à l'Ontario 24 %,
b) devenir une autre province
du Canada 4 %,
c) devenir un destrict fédéral 31 %.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2) Répartition des choix selon les groupes d'âges;

Âges: 18-24 - 25-34 - 35-54 - 55 + .


A) fasse partie .... 53,5% 42,2% 42,0% 29%
B) ne fasse partie.. 47,6% 57,8% 58,0% 71%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3) Répartition des choix selon que les répondants sont, OUI ou NON,
originaires de l'Outaouais:

Originaires: OUI NON

A) fasse partie du... 36,9% 45,9%
B) ne fasse partie... 63,1% 54,1%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4) Répartition des choix selon le lieu de travail;

Gatineau, Hull, Aylmer, Ottawa.

A) fasse partie du... 63,7% 52,5% 42,0% 28,5%
B) ne fasse pas partie... 36,3% 47,5% 58,0% 71,5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Rodgers
~~~~~~~~~~

" La déclaration unilatérale d'indépendance est
l'ultime symbole de la liberté d'un peuple."

Pierre Bourgault
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Luc Richard

unread,
Mar 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/2/97
to

gilbert germain wrote:
>
> Luc Richard wrote:
> >
> > MANGEZ D'LA MARDE BANDE D'USURPATEURS-COLONISATEURS
>
> TU DEVRAS MANGER LA TIENNE POUR COMMENCER!
> VIVA LA PARTITIONE

miam-miam.

Fourre toé la dans'l'cul ta "paritione"

Luc Richard

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

Arthur D. Mira wrote:
>
> Hey Luc...I think I'll join you in visiting the medium...
> Maybe then I'll be able to find out when it was I made
> fun of his english.
>
> Hé Luc. Je m'imagine je te joindrai dans en visite le moyen.
> Peut-être donc je serai capable de déterminer quand j'ai causé
> amusements de son anglais.
>
> BTW...eggs get 'candled' too.


Avec mon décodeur automatique je crois avoir déchiffré TON message
artistique.

translation:
I think the DEAD DUCKS from Manitropas feels persecuted
and maybe ONLY YOU can tell me exactly why !

COIN-COIN.

Luc Richard

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

Regarde comme il faut ton adresse, le crosseur, pis dis-moé
c'est quoi ton intérèt de supporter les FUCKEN' partitionnists
du Québec ?

Sinon la vengeance et de vouloir reprendre une autre bouchée
de laine su'l dos des Québécois.

Matt Cundill wrote:
>
> Matt (Mauler) Cundill *Acadia Alumni '92
> Music Director *LCC Alumni '87
> 100.3 FM The Bear *Bring Back Stubbies
> Edmonton, Alberta *Planet Earth

pas...@vir.com

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

>> Hé Luc. Je m'imagine je te joindrai dans en visite le moyen.

Veut dire quoi ça ?

========================================
mailto:pas...@vir.com
http://www.vir.com/~patricia/pascar.htm
http://www.vir.com/~patricia/pageweb.htm
http://www.vir.com/~patricia/surf.htm
Javascript, .Wav et plus.
Creation de site web, a bas prix.
========================================


Isabelle Boudreau

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

On Sun, 2 Mar 1997 dkenter...@cadvision.com wrote:

> Erik <lo...@downbelow.ca> wrote:
>
> >dkenter...@cadvision.com wrote:
> >>
> >> >Au contraire M. Separatist ! All the polls show that the support for
> >> >partition is not only strong among Anglo and Allophones in Quebec ,
> >> >but also among Francophones because it is the ONLY logical ,
> >> >democratic and legal result of either a proper democratic vote on
> >> >separation , or a UDI by the PQ .
> >>
> >> >>Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec , C A N A D A !!!!!!
> >> >spyder
> >>
> >> just hurry up and seperate
> >>
> >> we all will be better off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> >Another posting from the Mobile Home Owners (Alberta Div.) faction of
> >the Happie Frootcake Brigade.
>
> >E.
> >--
> >e-mail (non-commercial) welcome at: sch...@bc.sympatico.ca
> >___________________________________________________________
> >** People that are really very weird can get into sensitive
> > positions and have a tremendous impact on history **
> > - former US VP Dan Quayle
> im serious

you're stupid.


> we should take a vote to see if WE want the frenchies
> but this wont happen. if it did the french ies would be toast.
>

who exactly is "WE"? Oh, gee...next "WE"'ll be voting to see if "WE"
really want Natives, then, who knows...maybe "WE" can get rid of those
pesky Asians...etc.
This is an ignorant, red-neck, stereotypical view. I'm sure that the
"frenchies" will be impressed. As will the rest of Canada.


Isabelle Boudreau

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

On Mon, 3 Mar 1997 pas...@vir.com wrote:

>=20
> >> H=E9 Luc. Je m'imagine je te joindrai dans en visite le moyen.
>=20
> Veut dire quoi =E7a ?


En anglais, le mot medium peut dire moyen (comme dans, j'en ai un moyen=20
tas..) et ca peut aussi vouloir dire quelqu'un qui lis dans des boules de=
=20
cristales. Plus ou moin.

>=20
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>=20
>=20
>=20

Patrick Lepine

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

dkenter...@cadvision.com wrote:
>
> Erik <lo...@downbelow.ca> wrote:
>
> >dkenter...@cadvision.com wrote:
> >>
> >> >Au contraire M. Separatist ! All the polls show that the support for
> >> >partition is not only strong among Anglo and Allophones in Quebec ,
> >> >but also among Francophones because it is the ONLY logical ,
> >> >democratic and legal result of either a proper democratic vote on
> >> >separation , or a UDI by the PQ .
> >>
> >> >>Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec , C A N A D A !!!!!!
> >> >spyder
> >>
> >> just hurry up and seperate
> >>
> >> we all will be better off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> >Another posting from the Mobile Home Owners (Alberta Div.) faction of
> >the Happie Frootcake Brigade.
>
> >E.
> >--
> >e-mail (non-commercial) welcome at: sch...@bc.sympatico.ca
> >___________________________________________________________
> >** People that are really very weird can get into sensitive
> > positions and have a tremendous impact on history **
> > - former US VP Dan Quayle
> im serious
> we should take a vote to see if WE want the frenchies
> but this wont happen. if it did the french ies would be toast.

A-trolling-we-will-go
A-trolling-we-will-go
high-ho-the-merry-o
A-trolling-we-will-go

Patrick Lepine

LAURENT

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

Pourquoi s'arrêter à la partition du Quebec seulement? S'il est
divsible les territoires de l'ontario,de Terre-Neuve et du
Nouveau-Brunswick le sont aussi.Le Quebec prendrait les regions ou il y
a des Canadiens-Francais,en plus du Labrador
naturellemment. De plus si l'infâme
``West-Island`,repaire de notre chère minorite Afrikaner colonialiste
anglo,veut se separer, les Quebecois qui l'habitent on le droit de
demeurer au Quebec.Le `west-island` devra donc être divise
aussi,quartiers par quartiers,rues par rues,maisons par maisons.On peut
aller loin avec ce genre de raisonnement.Ca sent le
rechauffe,Bosnie,Sarajevo.Qu'ils sont originaux nos anglais!

Paul Rodgers

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

On Mon, 03 Mar 1997 15:52:40 -0500, LAURENT <"laur...@videotron.ca
votre_adresse"@videotron.ca> wrote:

>Pourquoi s'arrêter à la partition du Quebec seulement? S'il est
>divsible les territoires de l'ontario,de Terre-Neuve

Si Terreneuve, comme nouvelle province canadienne, avait été divisible en 1949,
comme certains prétendent que le Québec de 1997 l'est, les 48% + des
terreneuviens qui s'opposèrent à l'adhèsion au Canada s'en seraient servi pour
garder une partie de la nouvelle province en colonie de la Grande Bretagne. Ce
ne fut pas fait, pour la même raison qu'un Québec souverain le sera. C'est dans
son entité de 1867 comme province du Bas-Canada que le Québec adhéra à la
fédération, et c'est dans son entité de 1997+ qu'elle deviendra, d'ici le début
du prochain millénaire un État libre et souverain.

et du
>Nouveau-Brunswick le sont aussi.Le Quebec prendrait les regions ou il y
>a des Canadiens-Francais,en plus du Labrador
>naturellemment. De plus si l'infâme
>``West-Island`,repaire de notre chère minorite Afrikaner colonialiste
>anglo,veut se separer, les Quebecois qui l'habitent on le droit de
>demeurer au Quebec.Le `west-island` devra donc être divise
>aussi,quartiers par quartiers,rues par rues,maisons par maisons.On peut
>aller loin avec ce genre de raisonnement.Ca sent le
>rechauffe,Bosnie,Sarajevo.Qu'ils sont originaux nos anglais!

Sebastien Morissette

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

Matt Cundill wrote:
>
> Maybe Luc dislikes partitionists because it will expose his weakness in
> simple techniques like "connect the dots".
>
> When you were a child, did you colour within the lines?
>
> >Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?
>
> Yes, but I would advise you not too...
>
> ----------------
>
> Matt (Mauler) Cundill *Acadia Alumni '92
> Music Director *LCC Alumni '87
> 100.3 FM The Bear *Bring Back Stubbies
> Edmonton, Alberta *Planet Earth
>
> Visit the Bear's Web Cave: http://www.theBearRocks.com


Écris donc en français imbécile, tu provoques en écrivant en anglais
alors que tu comprends très bien le français. Va coucher là bas!

Sébastien

Matt Cundill

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

Sebastien Morissette wrote:

> Écris donc en français imbécile, tu provoques en écrivant en anglais
> alors que tu comprends très bien le français. Va coucher là bas!

> Sébastien

I'll use any language I feel like. It seems that your worldly view of
usenet extends to the depanneur.

You're a butthead.

Patrick Lepine

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

LAURENT wrote:
>
> Pourquoi s'arrêter à la partition du Quebec seulement? S'il est
> divsible les territoires de l'ontario,de Terre-Neuve et du

> Nouveau-Brunswick le sont aussi.Le Quebec prendrait les regions ou il y
> a des Canadiens-Francais,en plus du Labrador
> naturellemment. De plus si l'infâme
> ``West-Island`,repaire de notre chère minorite Afrikaner colonialiste
> anglo,veut se separer, les Quebecois qui l'habitent on le droit de
> demeurer au Quebec.Le `west-island` devra donc être divise
> aussi,quartiers par quartiers,rues par rues,maisons par maisons.On peut
> aller loin avec ce genre de raisonnement.Ca sent le
> rechauffe,Bosnie,Sarajevo.Qu'ils sont originaux nos anglais!

Et vous avez quoi comme preuve que les francos hors Quebec veulent te
joindre. Pour ma part, je pense qu'ils ne sont pas des Quebecois, parce
qu'ils ne veulent pas l'etre.

Patrick Lepine

Patrick Lepine

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

Luc Richard wrote:
>
> Regarde comme il faut ton adresse, le crosseur, pis dis-moé
> c'est quoi ton intérèt de supporter les FUCKEN' partitionnists
> du Québec ?
>
> Sinon la vengeance et de vouloir reprendre une autre bouchée
> de laine su'l dos des Québécois.
>
> Matt Cundill wrote:
> >
> > Matt (Mauler) Cundill *Acadia Alumni '92
> > Music Director *LCC Alumni '87
> > 100.3 FM The Bear *Bring Back Stubbies
> > Edmonton, Alberta *Planet Earth
>
> Avez-vous pris vot' Nescafé ce matin ?

C'est quoi que vous dites par ca Luc? Le monde qui a quitte Quebec ont
aucun interet des affaires Quebecoise? Est-ce que vous dites ca au
separatists hors Quebec aussi?

Patrick Lepine

Matt Cundill

unread,
Mar 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/3/97
to

Luc Richard wrote:

> Regarde comme il faut ton adresse, le crosseur, pis dis-moé
> c'est quoi ton intérèt de supporter les FUCKEN' partitionnists
> du Québec ?

> Sinon la vengeance et de vouloir reprendre une autre bouchée
> de laine su'l dos des Québécois.

Actually, I am part owner of two pieces of property in the province of
Quebec. Trying to unload them is difficult. Gee, I wonder why it's so
tough. There must be something hindering the market... but I can't quite
pinpoint the problem... hmmm, this is a tough one. It's so frustrating
when no one wants to invest and people keep leaving like CP and their
2000 jobs... Anyway, I hope we can put our heads together to figure out
what the problem is...

----------------

Matt (Mauler) Cundill *Acadia Alumni '92
Music Director *LCC Alumni '87
100.3 FM The Bear *Bring Back Stubbies
Edmonton, Alberta *Planet Earth

Visit the Bear's Web Cave: http://www.theBearRocks.com

dkenter...@cadvision.com

unread,
Mar 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/4/97
to

Isabelle Boudreau <umbo...@CC.UManitoba.CA> wrote:

>On Sun, 2 Mar 1997 dkenter...@cadvision.com wrote:

>> Erik <lo...@downbelow.ca> wrote:
>>
>> >dkenter...@cadvision.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Au contraire M. Separatist ! All the polls show that the support for
>> >> >partition is not only strong among Anglo and Allophones in Quebec ,
>> >> >but also among Francophones because it is the ONLY logical ,
>> >> >democratic and legal result of either a proper democratic vote on
>> >> >separation , or a UDI by the PQ .
>> >>

polls mean shit
you bareley stayed in canada by YOUR vote
bet your money we vote to boot you out and be done with this
problem!!!

>> >> >>Marc Granger, St-Jean, Quebec , C A N A D A !!!!!!
>> >> >spyder
>> >>
>> >> just hurry up and seperate
>> >>
>> >> we all will be better off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> >Another posting from the Mobile Home Owners (Alberta Div.) faction of
>> >the Happie Frootcake Brigade.
>>
>> >E.
>> >--
>> >e-mail (non-commercial) welcome at: sch...@bc.sympatico.ca
>> >___________________________________________________________
>> >** People that are really very weird can get into sensitive
>> > positions and have a tremendous impact on history **
>> > - former US VP Dan Quayle
>> im serious

>you're stupid.

really
is that why we fund 2 french cbc channels in an very predominant
english provence, is that why all literature is bilingual.Im tired of
french beiing rammed down our throat.
your kind has been threatening to seperate for years ..
so do it
it is about time the minority stop setting the pace.
the frenchies claim they are distint. now the indians claim the same
before you know it you have every minority claiming special status.
hell the rcmp even changed their dress code.
the looser.............ENGLISH canada
I think your the stupid one as when quebec is gone
its goona hurt you not me

thank god I,m not french

we means western canada
dont believe me drive by leave your frennchie plate on your car
and count how many times people try to run you off the road!!!!


>> we should take a vote to see if WE want the frenchies
>> but this wont happen. if it did the french ies would be toast.
>>

>who exactly is "WE"? Oh, gee...next "WE"'ll be voting to see if "WE"

>really want Natives, then, who knows...maybe "WE" can get rid of those
>pesky Asians...etc.
>This is an ignorant, red-neck, stereotypical view. I'm sure that the
>"frenchies" will be impressed. As will the rest of Canada.

a typical response from a frenchie when they hear the TRUTH
cant take another point of view?
your not so distint to me
the republic of western canada does NOT include quebec.
ps remember that labrador is part of newfoundland
or are you goiing to try to screw them too!!!

PJH

unread,
Mar 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/4/97
to

Jean-René Levesque wrote:
>
> On 18 Feb 97 21:39:52 GMT, legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Le Guerrier
> Louis-Luc) wrote:
>

> >
> Tu me fais peur quand tu es fâché, Louis-Luc... C'est tu toi qui va
> prendre les armes pour nous empêcher de nous séparer? Si oui, on est
> vraiment fait... ;-)

> --
> Jean-René Levesque,
> Responsable Général
> L'Action Gauchiste
> http://www.cedep.com/~jabba/jean/as.htm

Serieusement Mr Levesque, c'est le Quebec qui ce divise. Le Reste du
Quebec est d'ailleurs mal pris quand tu depense $0.50 pour traverser un
Pont Canadien pour travailler au Canada(Montreal). 70% de l'industrie
Quebecoise d'aujourdhui ce trouve a Montreal.
Le Reste du Quebec est economiquement pauvre et sans resource. Le monde
entier vous trouve raciste et sans logique. Bonjours
--
Pierre :-) MTL Canada
Mailto:pj_h...@alcor.concordia.ca

PJH

unread,
Mar 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/4/97
to

Jean-René Levesque wrote:
>
> On 18 Feb 97 21:39:52 GMT, legu...@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Le Guerrier
> Louis-Luc) wrote:
>

> >
> Tu me fais peur quand tu es fâché, Louis-Luc... C'est tu toi qui va
> prendre les armes pour nous empêcher de nous séparer? Si oui, on est
> vraiment fait... ;-)
> --
> Jean-René Levesque,
> Responsable Général
> L'Action Gauchiste
> http://www.cedep.com/~jabba/jean/as.htm
Serieusement Mr Levesque, c'est le Quebec qui ce divise. Le Reste du
Quebec est d'ailleurs mal pris quand tu depense $0.50 pour traverser un
Pont Canadien pour travailler au Canada(Montreal). 70% de l'industrie
Quebecoise d'aujourdhui ce trouve a Montreal.
Le Reste du Quebec est economiquement pauvre et sans resource.

Sebastien Morissette

unread,
Mar 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/4/97
to

> Et vous avez quoi comme preuve que les francos hors Quebec veulent te
> joindre. Pour ma part, je pense qu'ils ne sont pas des Quebecois, parce
> qu'ils ne veulent pas l'etre.
>
> Patrick Lepine


Quoi, tu penses qu'ils aiment mieux etre Ontariens ou Manitobains? Ok
ils ne sont pas Quebecois, mais pourquoi tu parles a leur place pour
dire qu'ils ne veulent pas etre Quebecois, representes-tu leurs
opinions? En vertu de quel droit parles-tu a leur place? Peut-etre que
notre ami Patrick est la nouvelle Jojo Savard?

I love you and I kiss you! Sebastien

Hugo Morissette

unread,
Mar 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/4/97
to

Je veux repondre a l'ostie de cave qui est en faveur de la partition...

As-tu pris cette idee la en ecoutant fraisinette ?

Si je suis ton raisonnement en vertu du droit que toutes les
circonscriptions voulant se rattacher au Canada a la suite d'un vote en
faveur de la separation, eh bien,les circonscriptions ayant vote oui en
1995, pourraient former un pays immediatement...

Tu vois que ton raisonnement a la Stephane Dion a sa place... dans une
poubelle tout comme toi !

Donc mon ponpon, retourne jouer au cow boy et a l'indien pis ferme ta
yeule... reviens quand tu auras quelque chose de plus intelligent a
dire.

Hugo

Sebastien Morissette

unread,
Mar 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/4/97
to

Matt Cundill wrote:
>
> Sebastien Morissette wrote:
>
> > Écris donc en français imbécile, tu provoques en écrivant en anglais
> > alors que tu comprends très bien le français. Va coucher là bas!
>
> > Sébastien
>
> I'll use any language I feel like. It seems that your worldly view of
> usenet extends to the depanneur.
>
> You're a butthead.
>

Ecoute mon pit parle la langue que tu veux mais comme tu peux voir tout
le monde ecrit en francais sur ce message, donc pourquoi tu viens nous
faire chier avec ton anglais stupide? Si je vais sur un message en
anglais je vais repondre en anglais, donc comme tu peux voir je vais
plus loin que mon depanneur. Meme que ca demontre que j'ai une ouverture
d'esprit plus grande que toi (si tu en a un) et que toi pauvre epais, tu
fais comme tous les pauvres petits blokes qui ne comprennent rien et qui
s'enferment dans leur petit monde sans essayer de comprendre les raisons
qui nous motivent a vouloir partir du Canada (chantons l'hymne national
pour te faire plaisir). D apres moi a force de regarder les champs des
Prairies et a ecouter du country, ton cerveau a ramolli.

J'aime mieux etre un butthead que pauvre minable bloke sans
cervelle se pensant le nombril du monde au milieu de son champs avec les
vaches.

Amicalement
Sebastien

Isabelle Boudreau

unread,
Mar 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/4/97
to

Je crois que si les Acadiens, Franco-Manitobains, etc. voulais etre
Quebecois, ils seraient deja la. Personellement, je n'irais pas vivre au
Quebec pour tout l'or du monde.

Patrick Lepine

unread,
Mar 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/4/97
to

Merci Isabelle, vous l'avez dit mieux que mon effort pathetique. Je
voulais dire que les Acadiens et les Franco Manitobains ont leurs
racines, maisons, familles, etc. au NB et Man, et pas au Quebec.

Patrick Lepine

Patrick Lepine

unread,
Mar 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/4/97
to

Garde donc le "header" encore imbicile. 7 groups anglais (bc.gen,
ab.gen,man.gen,ont.gen,nb.gen,nf.gen) deux bilingue (can.gen,mtl.gen) et
deux francais (qc.gen,qc.pol). C'est une bonne chose que t'aime etre
butthead, tu fais la preuve que tu l'es a chaque reponse.

Now in English:
Look at the header imbicile. There are 7 English, 2 bilingual, and 2
French groups. It's a good thing you like being a buthead, you prove
how much you are one with each response.
It occurs to me now that he may just be a newbie.
Patrick Lepine

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages