Seeing the Unseen: Unearthing Evidence of Racism in Darwins Theories

110 views
Skip to first unread message

Dr. Bhakti Niskama Shanta

unread,
Sep 28, 2024, 12:54:02 AMSep 28
to Online Sadhu Sanga
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution has had profound and unforeseen consequences. It posits that societal resources are limited, leading to a scarcity of goods for universal distribution. Consequently, Darwin's theory suggests that organisms with superior adaptability will thrive, while those deemed inferior will succumb. This concept remains highly relevant in scientific communities. However, Darwin's theory of natural selection has faced numerous criticisms, particularly for validating discriminatory practices based on racial and socioeconomic factors. While not the direct cause of societal issues, the theory legitimized existing biases, influencing scientific research supporting the material origin of life and exacerbating divisions based on racial and other differences.

Pre-dating Darwin's discoveries, imperialism was already entrenched, but his work lent a veneer of legitimacy to racist European perspectives. European nations exploited his natural selection theory to justify their treatment of Africans, often relying on physical characteristics like height to draw flawed conclusions. The smaller stature of certain African tribes was misrepresented as evidence of European superiority. Moreover, cranial size was wrongly cited as evidence of intellectual superiority, with Africans' supposedly smaller skulls indicating reduced cognitive capacity. Imperialism was disingenuously portrayed as a civilizing force, while European powers exploited African resources, converting them into goods to sell back to Africans, thereby equating whiteness with civilization. Furthermore, Darwin's theory had a profound impact on the Nazi party's persecution of Jews, resulting in the devastating loss of six million lives during the Holocaust. Evolutionary theories, including Darwin's, have significantly contributed to societal marginalization, perpetuating racism and division based on physical traits despite false claims of theory's scientific substantiation with empirical evidence.

http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx7cE2M_nEYfkT037rAsXvGac0fvfByNnW?si=120PJhevf9u6XooD

-----
First International Conference on a Dialogue between Vedanta and Science on the Origin of Life and Evolution
(Vedanta and Science Dialogue Series: VSDS — 2024)

November 23—24, 2024

Aksharaa School, Kathmandu, Nepal

First International Conference: Dialogue between Vedanta & Science


Paul Hager

unread,
Sep 28, 2024, 4:32:48 AMSep 28
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com
What a load of ignorant propaganda! Please stop sending me these vitriolic diatribes.
Paul

Emeritus Professor Paul Hager
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
University of Technology, Sydney
PO Box 123
Broadway NSW 2007
Australia
Phone +61 (0)2 95805384
E-mail Paul....@uts.edu.au

NEW EDITED SPECIAL ISSUE

Learning and Complexity Theory 

Educational Philosophy and Theory Vol. 56(3) May 2024

Guest Editors: Paul Hager and David Beckett


The Special Issue's 11 article include:

Paul Hager & David Beckett (2024) Refurbishing learning via complexity

theory: Introduction, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2022.2105696

Paul Hager & David Beckett (2024) This Special Issue as complexity theory in action DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2023.2186223


NEW BOOK CHAPTER
D. Beckett & P. Hager (2023) ‘Complexity Theory: A Key to Understanding Emergent Learning and Judgements in Workplaces’ in H. Bound, A. Edwards, K. Evans & A. Chia (Eds.) Workplace Learning for Changing Social and Economic Circumstances. London: Routledge. (Chapter 1 of 17).


RECENT BOOK CHAPTER

Concepts and Definitions of Lifelong Learning 

Paul J. Hager

The Oxford Handbook of Lifelong Learning, Second Edition, 2021, pp. 3-34

Edited by Manuel London 


RECENT UNESCO COMMISSIONED PAPER

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374089









From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Dr. Bhakti Niskama Shanta <jaga....@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2024 2:51 PM
To: Online Sadhu Sanga <online_sa...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Sadhu Sanga] Seeing the Unseen: Unearthing Evidence of Racism in Darwins Theories
 
--
----------------------------
Idols of the Mind vs. True Reality
https://www.amazon.com/Idols-Mind-vs-True-Reality/dp/1734908955

 
First International Conference on a Dialogue between Vedanta and Science on the Origin of Life and Evolution
(Vedanta and Science Dialogue Series: VSDS — 2024)
November 23—24, 2024
Aksharaa School, Kathmandu
https://scienceandscientist.org/conference/vsds/2024
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Math, Narashimapalli, Nabadwip Dham, West Bengal, India
https://scsmathworldwide.com
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/237038868.13722355.1727499119179%40mail.yahoo.com.

UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of the University of Technology Sydney. Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects. Think. Green. Do. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

University of Ireland

unread,
Sep 28, 2024, 8:46:23 PMSep 28
to Online_Sadhu_Sanga
https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?pageseq=1&itemID=F373&viewtype=text

" the preservation of favorite races in struggle for life"

It is quite simply a fact that the British have held on to a deluded notion of the superiority of their race in the face of a plethora of facts to the contrary. For the moment let us simply talk about demographics rather than the extraordinarily violent attack on native culture in India and Ireland

A decade before the publication of this book the British engineered an artificial shortage of food in Ireland from 1845 to 1850. You may not know that enough food was exported under armed guard to prevent any famine during that period. Instead at least one million died. The true figure is probably much greater with a similar number of people having to emigrate and the result can be seen in the frequency of Irish surnames all over what is called the new world

So successful was the project that the British repeated it in Bengal among many other places. Regrettably we Irish had to explain to them in language they understood to cease and desist this type of behavior. Should they attempt anything of this nature again we will again explain to them



Krishna Keshava Dasa

unread,
Sep 28, 2024, 10:56:56 PMSep 28
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear respected Prof. Paul Hager,


Namaste. Growing up in America’s educational system, I am very much aware of the unquestionable authority to which Darwinian evolution is taught to students. I’ve witnessed those skeptical of Darwin’s theory receiving emotional backlash instead of rational discussion, even from esteemed scientists. Interestingly, Chinese paleontologist Jun-Yuan Chen recognized “In China we can criticize Darwin, but not the government; in America, you can criticize the government, but not Darwin.” As someone who has also grown to be very skeptical of this theory, I’m extremely aware of the sensitivity with which any criticism of Darwinian evolution must be handled. In all sincerity, and with great respect for yourself as an educator of future generations, I humbly request that the following be considered with unbiased seriousness. Despite its lengthiness, I hope someone may find it valuable.


You may have heard that India removed the Darwinian theory of evolution from their 9th and 10th grade textbooks in 2022. [1] [2] South Korea did the same in 2012. [3] [4] Six years before that, in 2006, the European Parliament gathered for a seminar on “Teaching evolutionary theory in Europe. Is your child being indoctrinated in the classroom?” [5] [6] Aside from polarizing debates defending either Darwinian evolution or creationism — to which there are alternatives like the Third Way of Evolution project [7] — there are major problems with how evolution is taught to the masses. The five best-selling popular evolution books barely mention the cutting-edge discoveries of 21st-century biology, which empirically validate that all living entities from single cells to complex organisms are purposeful cognitive agents and that evolution is a goal-directed process influenced by decision-making, cooperation, and problem-solving, [8] where random genetic mutations play a minor role and “[n]atural selection eliminates and maybe maintains, but it doesn’t create.” [9] Such conclusions are crucial to teach both current and up-and-coming scientists, as they affect research areas as important as cancer, where embracing the view that all life is cognitive allows cancer to be treated as a cellular communication problem rather than haphazardly being blasted with radiation.


This dissent from Darwinism is justifiable from another perspective. The serious social repercussions of Darwinism that Dr. B Niskama Shanta raised have been acknowledged by serious scientific and academic institutions connected with the USA’s government such as the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM). Given the alternative name to Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, also called Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life — a title meant to elaborate on the notion of natural selection [10] — it is not surprising that ideologies detrimental to human flourishing sprouted from this theory. Such ideologies include Social Darwinism, Eugenics, and Scientific Racism. Eugenics, first put forward by Charles Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton, is the notion that a superior race could be cultivated through selective breeding. Here, those deemed inferior would dilute or tarnish the superiority of the ideal race, so they were to be eliminated. This influenced Adolf Hitler’s “racial hygiene” project, as acknowledged by the USHMM. [11] [12] Significantly, the NHGRI explains:


“When the HGP [Human Genome Project] began in 1990, there was widespread concern that genomics would lead to a new era of eugenics. [...] For more than three decades, the NHGRI ELSI Research Program has funded research on all aspects of the social and ethical implications of genomics, including the legacies of eugenics and scientific racism in the context of new and emerging genetic and genomic technologies. Building on a long tradition of these legacies, NHGRI is committed to taking proactive steps to provide leadership in the field of genomics in addressing structural racism and anything that would foster eugenics-based ideas. Together with efforts of the National Institute of Health, including the UNITE Initiative, NHGRI will continue to combat the legacies of eugenics and scientific racism and their present-day manifestations to develop an inclusive and welcoming genomics community.” [13] 


This statement from their fact sheet on “Eugenics and Scientific Racism” represents the NHGRI’s position from May 2022 to the present. Prior to this, considerations of Social Darwinism and its corollaries were disregarded as misrepresentations of Darwinian evolutionary theory, as seen in a brief NHGRI publication from November 2021 [14] and a webpage from the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH). [15]


The AMNH webpage says:


“Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection is entirely focused on an explanation of life's biological diversity. It is a scientific theory meant to explain observations about species. Yet some have used the theory to justify a particular view of human social, political, or economic conditions. All such ideas have one fundamental flaw: They use a purely scientific theory for a completely unscientific purpose. In doing so they misrepresent and misappropriate Darwin's original ideas.”


Don’t different races of human beings represent biological diversity? Is the social behavior of humans not an observation about species? Unfortunately, this self-forgetfulness of scientists has existed since 1620 when Francis Bacon asserted “Of ourselves we say nothing” (Latin: de nobis ipsis silemus). [16] However, something shifted in December 2021, when NHGRI held a two-day conference on “The Meaning of Eugenics: Historical and Present-Day Discussions of Eugenics and Scientific Racism.” [17] The in-depth May 2022 fact sheet uses much more delicate and nuanced language than the more crude November 2021 webpage. 


In March 2023, Harvard’s Kenneth C. Griffin Graduate School of Arts and Sciences also recognized these ideas through the perspective of Ruth Hubbard (1924-2016), a respected and accomplished biochemist from Harvard and wife of Nobel laureate George Wald. Hubbard “saw in Darwin’s portrayal of the animal world as a ‘kingdom’ marked by cutthroat competition for scarce resources, not objective science but a reflection of the society in which the English naturalist lived. Looked at from a different perspective, Hubbard thought, one could just as easily see the centrality of cooperation in species survival and flourishing, as the Russian zoologist, geologist, and revolutionary Peter Kropotkin had in his 1902 book, Mutual Aid. Increasingly, she saw supposedly objective scientists ‘reading their social arrangements’ into nature.” [18]


The topics discussed in this post are of the utmost importance to both the progress of science and society, with which the Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute is very much concerned. This is why we regularly arrange conferences in various formats — such as our two upcoming 2024 conferences [19] [20] — to discuss such matters. In conclusion, we find some sage words relevant to the kind of mentality required to accommodate the current paradigm shift, offered by futurist Alvin Toffler back in 1970: “The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.” 


Humble and respectful regards 🙏

Krishna Keshava Das

Serving Assistant to Dr. B Madhava Puri





References


  1. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01750-2 

  2. https://ncse.ngo/evolution-censored-textbooks-india

  3. https://www.nature.com/articles/486014a 

  4. https://ncse.ngo/creationist-success-south-korea

  5. https://www.nature.com/articles/444406a 

  6. https://ncse.ngo/devolution-and-dinosaurs 

  7. https://www.thethirdwayofevolution.com/

  8. https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1583603/Natural_Code_popular_evolution_books.pdf 

  9. https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/discover-interview-lynn-margulis-says-shes-not-controversial-shes-right 

  10. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsnr.2018.0015#FN3R

  11. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/eugenics 

  12. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/victims-of-the-nazi-era-nazi-racial-ideology

  13. https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Eugenics-and-Scientific-Racism

  14. https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/educational-resources/timelines/eugenics 

  15. https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/darwin/evolution-today/social-darwinism 

  16. https://history.hanover.edu/texts/Bacon/gi.html

  17. https://www.genome.gov/event-calendar/the-meaning-of-eugenics-historical-and-present-day-discussions-of-eugenics-and-scientific-racism

  18. https://gsas.harvard.edu/news/visionary

  19. https://scienceandscientist.org/conference/vsds/2024/

  20. https://bviscs.org/ss2024/ 



Dr. B. N. Shanta

unread,
Sep 29, 2024, 3:44:28 AMSep 29
to Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.
Dear Friends, 

I am grateful for your open and honest feedback. My objective is to foster a nuanced discussion, considering both supportive and critical views, to scrutinize Darwin's theory of evolution and its far-reaching implications for humanity. The insightful commentary provided by Sriman Krishna Keshava Prabhu and a University of Ireland expert has highlighted the troubling links between Darwin's theory and the validation of racist and discriminatory ideologies. Building on their contributions, I aim to provide additional evidence from Darwin's own writings to contextualize the conceptual framework of his human evolution theory.

In 1881, nearing the culmination of his life, Charles Darwin penned a letter to a colleague stating that the 

more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilised races throughout the world.[1]


Racial extermination was a foundational element of Darwin's theory, complementing its racist aspects. This viewpoint was not isolated, but rather a fundamental aspect of his human evolution theory, later elaborated upon in The Descent of Man (1871): 

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races.[2]


Adrian Desmond and James Moore, leading authorities on Darwinism's historical context, forthrightly confront the racist elements integral to Darwin's theory in their acclaimed biography:

‘Social Darwinism’ is often taken to be something extraneous, an ugly concretion added to the pure Darwinian corpus after the event, tarnishing Darwin’s image. But his notebooks make plain that competition, free trade, imperialism, racial extermination, and sexual inequality were written into the equation from the start — ‘Darwinism’ was always intended to explain human society.[3]

 
Desmond and Moore's subsequent work, Darwin’s Sacred Cause: How a Hatred of Slavery Shaped Darwin’s Views on Human Evolution, upholds their established viewpoint regarding Darwin's affiliation with racist ideologies and racial extermination. They contend:

By biologizing colonial eradication, Darwin was making ‘racial’ extinction an inevitable evolutionary consequence…. Races and species perishing was the norm of prehistory. The uncivilized races were following suite [sic], except that Darwin’s mechanism here was modern-day massacre…. Imperialist expansion was becoming the very motor of human progress. It is interesting, given the family’s emotional anti-slavery views, that Darwin’s biologizing of genocide should appear to be so dispassionate…. Natural selection was now predicated on the weaker being extinguished. Individuals, races even, had to perish for progress to occur. Thus it was, that ‘Wherever the European has trod, death seems to pursue the aboriginal’. Europeans were the agents of Evolution. Prichard’s warning about aboriginal slaughter was intended to alert the nation, but Darwin was already naturalizing the cause and rationalizing the outcome.[4]


Darwin's ideology reveals a striking dichotomy, as Desmond and Moore demonstrate, wherein his opposition to slavery coexists with an unsettling acceptance of genocide as an evolutionary catalyst, legitimizing colonial violence, a contradictory stance shared by numerous 19th-century abolitionists who concurrently espoused racist ideologies.

It is very true what you say about the higher races of men, when high enough, will have spread & exterminated whole nations.” Desmond and Moore then provide this explanation of Darwin’s sentiments that he expressed in that letter: “While slavery demanded one’s active participation, racial genocide was now normalized by natural selection and rationalized as nature’s way of producing ‘superior’ races. Darwin had ended up calibrating human ‘rank’ no differently from the rest of his society.[5]


How did Darwin come to hold racist views? His belief in racial inequality was commonplace in Europe, reflecting widespread scientific and popular attitudes preceding his work. These ideas legitimized slavery and conquest in the Americas, Australia, New Zealand, and Africa. However, scientists from oppressed nations, including India, may resist valid criticisms of Darwin's theory due to unfamiliarity with this historical context. Although empirical evidence from fossil records, genetics, and cell biology is scarce, the Darwinian view of evolution remains prominent, potentially perpetuated by American and British governments through selective funding, which may undermine indigenous cultures. Therefore, critical examination of this scientific narrative is necessary.
May be an image of 5 people

Reference:
1. Charles Darwin to William Graham, July 3, 1881, Darwin Correspondence Project, Letter no. 13230, University of Cambridge, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-13230.xml. Letter quoted in Francis Darwin, Charles Darwin: His Life Told in an Autobiographical Chapter, and in a Selected Series of His Published Letters (London: Murray, 1902), 64.
2. Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 2 vols. [1871] (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981), 1:201.
3. Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin. London: Michael Joseph, 1991. Pp. xxi, ISBN 0-7181-3430-3
4. Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin’s Sacred Cause: How a Hatred of Slavery Shaped Darwin’s Views on Human Evolution (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009), 149–151.
5. Charles Darwin to Charles Kingsley, February 6, 1862, Darwin Correspondence Project, Letter no. 3439, University of Cambridge, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-3439.xml. Letter quoted in Desmond and Moore, Darwin’s Sacred Cause, 318.



-----
First International Conference on a Dialogue between Vedanta and Science on the Origin of Life and Evolution
(Vedanta and Science Dialogue Series: VSDS — 2024)

November 23—24, 2024

Aksharaa School, Kathmandu, Nepal

Tina LIndhard

unread,
Sep 30, 2024, 7:15:33 AMSep 30
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Respected Scientists,

I would very much like to use some of the information this group is sharing in an academic paper I am writing  entitled

Novelty in the Scientific Approach Permits a New Way of Looking at Issues Surrounding  Abortion and the Social Construct of Reality Theory


The present conversations are fascinating and very informative. I appreciate that the references are included. 


Krisnas comments about evolutionary Darwinism serve me well and rather than just presenting them as mine I would like to have his permission to quote from his letter and use his name. 


Thanking you 


Tina 





Dr. Tina Lindhard
PhD Consciousness Studies
MA and PhD Mentor IUPS 

PastedGraphic-8.tiff

President CCAEspaña/Spain
CICA: Chair of Consciousness Research
Arka Dhyana (IM) Instructor



Krishna Keshava Dasa

unread,
Sep 30, 2024, 9:11:19 AMSep 30
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Dr. Lindhard,

Namaste. It's good to hear from you! Your exemplary integrity is sincerely appreciated. I am honored and humbled that you would like to reference my contribution, please cite the version we published on the Science of Spirit blog. If you'd like, feel free to share your published article once it's completed.

Respectful regards 🙏🏻
Krishna Keshava Das
Serving Assistant to
Sripad Bhakti Madhava Puri Maharaja, PhD

Princeton, New Jersey, USA






Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages