The Lab gets the *side eye*.....

[Tamika]

HEY GUYS..

INTERESTING FIND:...how is it that a NEGATIVE hiv1 and hiv2 and NEGATIVE western blot can have ALL PROTEINS listed on the test reults????....im staring at this right now, hmmm....something that caught my eye just now...so my thinking is correct when I stated as far as test reuslts are concerned, when all proteins are listed in a POSITIVE result, that could just be indicative of what they are looking for and NOT what is actually found....

my thoughts are this:

what is killing me is the labs...they are plentyful and that is where the grey area lies....I am finding inconsistencies on a macro level that can be explained away on a micro level because of numerous labs involved and the various protocols...

when i can have 500 test results and each one has their own way of explaining what is being seen on the actual document....some labs list proteins...some labs do not list proteins...it depends on the lab and if you have a poz and it has proteins listed but ina very vague way, they can easily say those are your proteins we found...BUT if you have a negative result that list proteins in a vague way, they will say oh dont worry, those were the proteins we were looking for but didnt find.....bullshit much??

 

now if we had ONE lab and it was throwing out all these inconsistencies...they can be debunked much faster

 

do any of you also agree with what i am saying about the numerous labs involved in hiv testing is a big major problem??