ZigBee

[Hai Phong]

Currently, I have themes: Simulate network ZigBee Omnet + +.But I have not know much about omnet.Can you guide me how to simulate a detailed ZigBee?.

[Sebastiano Manzella]

Use the open-source Framework MiXiM... in it is all for you..for something else contact me or read about in the group!!

[Anjanreddy Kasireddy]

           sorry to tell you that mixim has no proper protocol

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Sebastiano Manzella <sebastian...@gmail.com> wrote:

Use the open-source Framework MiXiM... in it is all for you..for something else contact me or read about in the group!!

--
--
Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure your membership,
visit http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp
 
 
 

--
With Regards,

K ANJAN REDDY,

M-Tech , IIT MADRAS

[Andrew Hardy]

Are you saying that Mixim includes a full zigbee simulation?

- Networking layer
- Application layer

etc, etc

I don't know of any simulation that does even half of one of these
Zigbee layers (according to spec)

But if there is I would 'very' interested to know!!

On 27/10/2012 10:24, Sebastiano Manzella wrote:
> Use the open-source Framework MiXiM... in it is all for you..for something else contact me or read about in the group!!
>
> --
> --
> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure your membership,
> visit http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp
>
>
>
>
>

> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5855 - Release Date: 10/26/12
>
>
>


________________________________
Important Notice: the information in this email and any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you should delete it from your system immediately without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise the sender by returning the email or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Liverpool John Moores University.

[Carlo Liuzza]

As i know, MiXiM includes 802.15.4 model validated on chip TI_CC2420.

2012/10/27 Andrew Hardy <a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk>

[Andrew Hardy]

Ok but that's 802.15.4 mac and link (and may be phy) layer protocol right?

It's 'not' a simulation of the zigbee specification is it?

On 27/10/2012 11:54, Carlo Liuzza wrote:
> As i know, MiXiM includes 802.15.4 model validated on chip TI_CC2420.
>
>

> 2012/10/27 Andrew Hardy <a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk<mailto:a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk>>

> Are you saying that Mixim includes a full zigbee simulation?
>
> - Networking layer
> - Application layer
>
> etc, etc
>
> I don't know of any simulation that does even half of one of these
> Zigbee layers (according to spec)
>
> But if there is I would 'very' interested to know!!
>
>
>
> On 27/10/2012 10:24, Sebastiano Manzella wrote:
> Use the open-source Framework MiXiM... in it is all for you..for something else contact me or read about in the group!!
>
> --
> --
> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure your membership,
> visit http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.

> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>

> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5855 - Release Date: 10/26/12
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Important Notice: the information in this email and any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you should delete it from your system immediately without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise the sender by returning the email or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Liverpool John Moores University.
>
>

[Hai Phong]

I tried Mixim 2.2.1. But It don't simulation ZigBee or WSN. Who can help me ?. Star network. And leach routing . 

[Andrew Hardy]

I'm sure Mixim simulates some kind of WSN. You mean W-ireless S-ensor
N-etworking right?

On 27/10/2012 16:24, Hai Phong wrote:
> I tried Mixim 2.2.1. But It don't simulation ZigBee or WSN. Who can help me ?. Star network. And leach routing .
>

> --
> --
> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure your membership,
> visit http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5855 - Release Date: 10/26/12
>
>
>

[Hai Phong]

That right !. If it simulation WSN, you can try simulation help you one project . Ok

Vào 02:04:23 UTC+7 Thứ bảy, ngày 27 tháng mười năm 2012, Hai Phong đã viết:

[Andrew Hardy]

I am confused.

In your last post you seemed to be saying that Mixim doesn't simulate
any kind of WSN.

I don't know mych about Mixim but I am sure it at least simulates some
kind of 802154 which is some kind of WSN, right?

On 28/10/2012 03:06, Hai Phong wrote:
> That right !. If it simulation WSN, you can try simulation help you one project . Ok
>
> Vào 02:04:23 UTC+7 Thứ bảy, ngày 27 tháng mười năm 2012, Hai Phong đã viết:

> Currently, I have themes: Simulate network ZigBee Omnet + +.But I have not know much about omnet.Can you guide me how to simulate a detailed ZigBee?.
>

[Hai Phong]

Because I can't simulation. You can ?. Help me ?

[Daniel Pfefferkorn]

I guess it is time that someone tries to clear things up a little bit. I
will give it a try:

a) First of all as of today there is no *proper* IEEE 802.15.4
implementation available that I am aware of, neither in MiXiM nor in
inet/inetmanet. As a consequence there is no *proper* implementation of
the ZigBee stack.

b) *IEEE 802.15.4 - What is available:*

- an implementation of the *draft* standard for ns2 can be found here:
nsnam.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nsnam/ns-2/wpan/ (implementation
differs somewhat from the non-draft version of the standard)

- properly implemented CSMA-CA algorithm following the the IEEE 802.15.4
guidelines for non-beacon-enabled WPANs in MiXiM in
src/modules/mac/CSMA802154.h|.cc|.ned.

- a *partial* port of the p802154 from ns2 can be found in inet's
Ieee802154 branch (src/linklayer/ieee802154); based upon draft version
of the standard and incomplete

- the same ns2 port can be found in inetmanet-2.0

c) *ZigBee - What is available:*
- star routing in inet & inetmanet which can be used to enable star
topologies (ieee802154 branch: src/networklayer/ieee802154)
- AODV which is the routing algorithm used by ZigBee NWK

d) More information:
- a good summary of IEEE 802.15.4 can be found here:
http://www.ifn.et.tu-dresden.de/~marandin/ZigBee/ZigBeeTutorial.html#General%20Description
(Do not let the name confuse you though)

e) (Maybe) Good news:
We are currently working on a full implementation of IEEE 802.15.4-2006,
which will hopefully be available Q1/2013. It is mainly a
completion/improvement, verification and adaption of the old ns2 port,
but that takes some time. Additionally, we are working on a complete
implementation of the ZigBee standard from 2008. This will hopefully be
completed Q2/2013.

Hope that helps!
Daniel

--
M.Sc. Daniel Pfefferkorn

Institute of Microelectronic Systems

Leibniz University Hannover phone: +49 (511) 762 - 19609
Appelstr. 4 fax: +49 (511) 762 - 19601
30167 Hannover e-mail: pfef...@ims.uni-hannover.de
Germany

[Andrew Hardy]

Thanks Daniel,

A couple of questions:

Regarding c)

- Is '802.15.4 star topology' Zigbee per se, or just a topology
supported by the 802.15.4 standard?
- Is Zigbee networking 'based' on AODV? rather than uses AODV
exactly? eg AODV has static link cost, Zigbee has non-static link cost,
possible jitter based on cost etc, Zigbee Pro includes a proactive
concentrator routing feature, and much other stuff, etc...

Regarding e)

This is excellent. Is there a site discussing this work any where? I am
wondering why I hadn't noticed anything about this before.
Will this be an omnet implementation? What if anything might it leave
out of the 2008 spec?
What does the (maybe) refer to?

Thanks again,

Andrew

[Daniel Pfefferkorn]

Hey Andrew,

ZigBee features three device classes:
- End Devide/Reduced Function Device (RFD)
- Router/Full Function Device (FFD)
- Coordinator (also FFD)

You can form a network among peers (also referred to as clustered
network), have a star topology where a coordinator distributes received
data to its children or form somewhat of a tree topology when routers
announce themselves to routers higher in the hierarchy.

I am not entirely sure whether ZigBee routing is identical to AODV, but
it is at least based on it. ZigBee PRO is a different topic. At this
time I am not sufficiently familiar with both ZigBee and ZigBee PRO to
give a sufficient answer. :)

Unfortunately I have not been able - and to be honest haven't thought
about - starting a public site/github project as I would rather just
contribute the work to inet. I have announced our plans to the inet
developers, but didn't really advertize it publically.

Plans so far:
- complete the incomplete port from ns2
- update it to match IEEE 802.15.4-2006
- rework its inner FSM structure
- verify the implementation (difficult task)

Plans are to contribute the work to inet. In other words, it will be an
"omnet implementation".

The (Maybe) referred to the simple fact that usually you are looking for
working and available protocol implementations when you want to solve
your problem, not implementations that will be available some time in
the future. :)

Hope that helps!

-- Daniel

[Anjanreddy Kasireddy]

    Hi Daniel,

                1). Does  the implementation that you are doing includes FCS implementation also or not because the present incomplete implementation has no provision for FCS implementation.

               2).  Can i know when can the code be open , please let me know the approx. date it may be far also because i have to inform my guide regarding my progress of the project.

               3).   Will the implementation be made mainly compatible with AODV

            Thank you,

[Daniel Pfefferkorn]

Hey Andrew,

Yes, it will be based on Version r17 and hopefully contain the whole
ZigBee stack (except for the Security Service Provider), but will not
contain any ZigBee PRO features. This might be something for the future
though.

At the moment I do not know whether we will be able to hold the date for
the ZigBee stack release. That's the problem with dates, you raise
expectations and that builds up pressure on both sides. :)
So, please do not rely on any of the given dates!

Regards,
--Daniel

Am 29.10.2012 18:29, schrieb Andrew Hardy:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> This sounds good.
>
> I had always thought of RFD, FFD, coordinator etc as first and foremost
> part of the 802154 spec with Zigbee sitting on / using these features.
>
> It looked like you mentioned in your earlier email that you would be
> implementing an omnet simulation of the Zigbee 2008 Spec (version r17?).
>
> Did I understand this correctly? Will this include all the Zigbee
> networking layer and the Zigbee application layer and all the Zigbe Pro
> (2008) features?
>
> I was surprised that this would follow so quickly after 802.15.4-2006 in
> 2013 Q1.
>
> It would be very useful though.
>
> Regards

[Daniel Pfefferkorn]

Hi Kanjan (?),

1) FCS: FCS will not be calculated, but of course contribute to the
overall frame length. Bit error evaluation is performed in the PHY.

2) As I said before, I hope that we will be able to contribute it to
inet in Q1/2013(IEEE 802.15.4-2006) and Q2/2013 (ZigBee-2008_r17).
Please do *not* rely on it though!

3) If you are talking about AODV-UU available in inetmanet-2.0, then the
answer is "yes". We do not see a reason to reimplement the routing
algorithm. On the other hand, I am not directly working on ZigBee ATM
and might be wrong regarding this issue. (Will have to check with one of
my students on this.)

Hope that answers your questions.

Regards,
-- Daniel

Am 30.10.2012 10:37, schrieb Anjanreddy Kasireddy:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> 1). Does the implementation that you are doing
> includes FCS implementation also or not because the present incomplete
> implementation has no provision for FCS implementation.
>
> 2). Can i know when can the code be open , please let
> me know the approx. date it may be far also because i have to inform my
> guide regarding my progress of the project.
>
> 3). Will the implementation be made mainly compatible
> with AODV
>
> Thank you,
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Daniel Pfefferkorn
> <daniel.pf...@ims.uni-hannover.de

> nsnam.cvs.sourceforge.net/__viewvc/nsnam/ns-2/wpan/
> <http://nsnam.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nsnam/ns-2/wpan/>

> (implementation
> differs somewhat from the non-draft version of the standard)
>
> - properly implemented CSMA-CA algorithm following the the
> IEEE 802.15.4
> guidelines for non-beacon-enabled WPANs in MiXiM in

> src/modules/mac/CSMA802154.h|.__cc|.ned.

>
> - a *partial* port of the p802154 from ns2 can be found in
> inet's
> Ieee802154 branch (src/linklayer/ieee802154); based upon
> draft version
> of the standard and incomplete
>
> - the same ns2 port can be found in inetmanet-2.0
>
> c) *ZigBee - What is available:*
> - star routing in inet & inetmanet which can be used to
> enable star
> topologies (ieee802154 branch: src/networklayer/ieee802154)
> - AODV which is the routing algorithm used by ZigBee NWK
>
> d) More information:
> - a good summary of IEEE 802.15.4 can be found here:

> http://www.ifn.et.tu-dresden.__de/~marandin/ZigBee/__ZigBeeTutorial.html#General%__20Description
> <http://www.ifn.et.tu-dresden.de/%7Emarandin/ZigBee/ZigBeeTutorial.html#General%20Description>

>
> (Do not let the name confuse you though)
>
> e) (Maybe) Good news:
> We are currently working on a full implementation of IEEE
> 802.15.4-2006,
> which will hopefully be available Q1/2013. It is mainly a
> completion/improvement, verification and adaption of the old
> ns2 port,
> but that takes some time. Additionally, we are working on a
> complete
> implementation of the ZigBee standard from 2008. This will
> hopefully be
> completed Q2/2013.
>
> Hope that helps!
> Daniel
>
>
>
> Am 27.10.2012 13:25, schrieb Andrew Hardy:
>
> Ok but that's 802.15.4 mac and link (and may be phy)
> layer protocol
> right?
>
> It's 'not' a simulation of the zigbee specification is it?
>
>
> On 27/10/2012 11:54, Carlo Liuzza wrote:
>
> As i know, MiXiM includes 802.15.4 model validated
> on chip TI_CC2420.
>
>
> 2012/10/27 Andrew Hardy
> <a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk

> <mailto:a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk><__mailto:a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk
> <mailto:a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk>__>>

> Are you saying that Mixim includes a full zigbee
> simulation?
>
> - Networking layer
> - Application layer
>
> etc, etc
>
> I don't know of any simulation that does even half
> of one of these
> Zigbee layers (according to spec)
>
> But if there is I would 'very' interested to know!!
>
>
>
> On 27/10/2012 10:24, Sebastiano Manzella wrote:
> Use the open-source Framework MiXiM... in it is all
> for you..for
> something else contact me or read about in the group!!
>
> --
> --
> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure
> your membership,

> visit http://groups.google.com/__group/omnetpp

> <http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

> <http://www.avg.com><http://www.avg.com__>

> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5855 -
> Release Date:
> 10/26/12
>
>
>
>
>

> __________________________________

> Important Notice: the information in this email and
> any attachments is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If
> you are not an
> intended recipient, or a person responsible for
> delivering it to an
> intended recipient, you should delete it from your
> system immediately
> without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise
> the sender by
> returning the email or by telephoning a number
> contained in the body
> of the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss
> or damage arising
> from viruses or changes made to this message after
> it was sent. The
> views contained in this email are those of the
> author and not
> necessarily those of Liverpool John Moores University.
>
>
> --
> --
> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure
> your membership,

> visit http://groups.google.com/__group/omnetpp

> <http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure
> your membership,

> visit http://groups.google.com/__group/omnetpp

> <http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5855 -
> Release Date:
> 10/26/12
>
>
>
>
>
>

> __________________________________

> Important Notice: the information in this email and any
> attachments is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an
> intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to an
> intended recipient, you should delete it from your system
> immediately
> without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise the sender by
> returning the email or by telephoning a number contained in the
> body of
> the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage
> arising from
> viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views
> contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily
> those of Liverpool John Moores University.
>
>
>
> --
> M.Sc. Daniel Pfefferkorn
>
> Institute of Microelectronic Systems
>
> Leibniz University Hannover phone: +49 (511) 762 - 19609
> Appelstr. 4 fax: +49 (511) 762 - 19601
> 30167 Hannover e-mail: pfef...@ims.uni-hannover.de

> <mailto:pfef...@ims.uni-hannover.de>

> Germany
>
> --
> --
> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure your membership,

> visit http://groups.google.com/__group/omnetpp

> <http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> With Regards,
>
> K ANJAN REDDY,
>
> M-Tech , IIT MADRAS
>

> --
> --
> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure your membership,
> visit http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp
>
>
>


--

[Andrew Hardy]

3) I see quite a few differences between AODV (UU) and Zigbee
routing/networking.

- non static link cost
- jitter based on cost
- network broadcast
- multi-cast routing mechanism

There is 'an' implementation of proactive routing in omnet AODVUU
(many-to-many)
which is similar to Zigbee Pro many-to-many (concentrator support), so
may be
worth including 'that' Zigbee Pro feature.

I am far from an expert of course, but I am happy to give any input,
discuss out of interest, or 'possibly' time permitting
test any partial components etc...

Thanks again.

Andrew

On 30/10/2012 12:14, Daniel Pfefferkorn wrote:
> Hi Kanjan (?),
>
> 1) FCS: FCS will not be calculated, but of course contribute to the
> overall frame length. Bit error evaluation is performed in the PHY.
>
> 2) As I said before, I hope that we will be able to contribute it to
> inet in Q1/2013(IEEE 802.15.4-2006) and Q2/2013 (ZigBee-2008_r17).
> Please do *not* rely on it though!
>
> 3) If you are talking about AODV-UU available in inetmanet-2.0, then the
> answer is "yes". We do not see a reason to reimplement the routing
> algorithm. On the other hand, I am not directly working on ZigBee ATM
> and might be wrong regarding this issue. (Will have to check with one of
> my students on this.)
>
> Hope that answers your questions.
>
> Regards,
> -- Daniel
>
> Am 30.10.2012 10:37, schrieb Anjanreddy Kasireddy:

>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> 1). Does the implementation that you are doing
>> includes FCS implementation also or not because the present incomplete
>> implementation has no provision for FCS implementation.
>>
>> 2). Can i know when can the code be open , please let
>> me know the approx. date it may be far also because i have to inform my
>> guide regarding my progress of the project.
>>
>> 3). Will the implementation be made mainly compatible
>> with AODV
>>
>> Thank you,
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Daniel Pfefferkorn
>> <daniel.pf...@ims.uni-hannover.de

>> nsnam.cvs.sourceforge.net/__viewvc/nsnam/ns-2/wpan/
>> <http://nsnam.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nsnam/ns-2/wpan/>

>> (implementation
>> differs somewhat from the non-draft version of the standard)
>> - properly implemented CSMA-CA algorithm following the the
>> IEEE 802.15.4
>> guidelines for non-beacon-enabled WPANs in MiXiM in

>> src/modules/mac/CSMA802154.h|.__cc|.ned.

>>
>> - a *partial* port of the p802154 from ns2 can be found in
>> inet's
>> Ieee802154 branch (src/linklayer/ieee802154); based upon
>> draft version
>> of the standard and incomplete
>>
>> - the same ns2 port can be found in inetmanet-2.0
>>
>> c) *ZigBee - What is available:*
>> - star routing in inet & inetmanet which can be used to
>> enable star
>> topologies (ieee802154 branch: src/networklayer/ieee802154)
>> - AODV which is the routing algorithm used by ZigBee NWK
>>
>> d) More information:
>> - a good summary of IEEE 802.15.4 can be found here:

>> http://www.ifn.et.tu-dresden.__de/~marandin/ZigBee/__ZigBeeTutorial.html#General%__20Description
>> <http://www.ifn.et.tu-dresden.de/%7Emarandin/ZigBee/ZigBeeTutorial.html#General%20Description>

>>
>> (Do not let the name confuse you though)
>>
>> e) (Maybe) Good news:
>> We are currently working on a full implementation of IEEE
>> 802.15.4-2006,
>> which will hopefully be available Q1/2013. It is mainly a
>> completion/improvement, verification and adaption of the old
>> ns2 port,
>> but that takes some time. Additionally, we are working on a
>> complete
>> implementation of the ZigBee standard from 2008. This will
>> hopefully be
>> completed Q2/2013.
>>
>> Hope that helps!
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 27.10.2012 13:25, schrieb Andrew Hardy:
>>
>> Ok but that's 802.15.4 mac and link (and may be phy)
>> layer protocol
>> right?
>>
>> It's 'not' a simulation of the zigbee specification is it?
>>
>>
>> On 27/10/2012 11:54, Carlo Liuzza wrote:
>>
>> As i know, MiXiM includes 802.15.4 model validated
>> on chip TI_CC2420.
>>
>>
>> 2012/10/27 Andrew Hardy
>> <a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk

>> <mailto:a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk><__mailto:a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk
>> <mailto:a.h...@2009.ljmu.ac.uk>__>>

>> Are you saying that Mixim includes a full zigbee
>> simulation?
>>
>> - Networking layer
>> - Application layer
>>
>> etc, etc
>>
>> I don't know of any simulation that does even half
>> of one of these
>> Zigbee layers (according to spec)
>>
>> But if there is I would 'very' interested to know!!
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27/10/2012 10:24, Sebastiano Manzella wrote:
>> Use the open-source Framework MiXiM... in it is all
>> for you..for
>> something else contact me or read about in the group!!
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure
>> your membership,

>> visit http://groups.google.com/__group/omnetpp

>> <http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

>> <http://www.avg.com><http://www.avg.com__>

>> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5855 -
>> Release Date:
>> 10/26/12
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>> __________________________________

>> Important Notice: the information in this email and
>> any attachments is
>> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If
>> you are not an
>> intended recipient, or a person responsible for
>> delivering it to an
>> intended recipient, you should delete it from your
>> system immediately
>> without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise
>> the sender by
>> returning the email or by telephoning a number
>> contained in the body
>> of the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss
>> or damage arising
>> from viruses or changes made to this message after
>> it was sent. The
>> views contained in this email are those of the
>> author and not
>> necessarily those of Liverpool John Moores University.
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure
>> your membership,

>> visit http://groups.google.com/__group/omnetpp

>> <http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure
>> your membership,

>> visit http://groups.google.com/__group/omnetpp

>> <http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5855 -
>> Release Date:
>> 10/26/12
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>> __________________________________

>> Important Notice: the information in this email and any
>> attachments is
>> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an
>> intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to an
>> intended recipient, you should delete it from your system
>> immediately
>> without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise the sender by
>> returning the email or by telephoning a number contained in the
>> body of
>> the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage
>> arising from
>> viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views
>> contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily
>> those of Liverpool John Moores University.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> M.Sc. Daniel Pfefferkorn
>>
>> Institute of Microelectronic Systems
>>
>> Leibniz University Hannover phone: +49 (511) 762 - 19609
>> Appelstr. 4 fax: +49 (511) 762 - 19601
>> 30167 Hannover e-mail: pfef...@ims.uni-hannover.de

>> <mailto:pfef...@ims.uni-hannover.de>

>> Germany
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure your membership,

>> visit http://groups.google.com/__group/omnetpp

>> <http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Regards,
>>
>> K ANJAN REDDY,
>>
>> M-Tech , IIT MADRAS
>>

>> --
>> --
>> Sent from the OMNeT++ mailing list. To configure your membership,
>> visit http://groups.google.com/group/omnetpp
>>
>>
>>
>